Kickoff Advantages in Defeating Man, Single Wedge and Double Wedge Returns

By Wes Anderson
Specials Teams Coordinator
New Palestine High School (IN)

 

 

At New Palestine, we are an aggressive, up-tempo, no huddle, power spread offense, and a blitz-heavy 3-3 stack defense. When I became the Special Teams Coordinator, I wanted to bring that same aggressiveness to our special teams. We tell our kids we play fast and hard and to put a strain on our opponents on downs 1, 2, and 3, but we weren’t really doing that in the kicking game. In the other two phases, our expectation is to punish our opponents relentlessly, but then we gave opponents a bunch of hidden yards on 4th down. Why? Our defense works so hard to get off the field, why don’t we take advantage of that in the kicking game?

New Palestine is in the second-largest class in Indiana, so we play against some incredibly talented specialists, particularly kick and punt returners. We only have around 45 players on our varsity roster in a given year. With those two factors considered, the decision about who plays on specials is an easy one for us. Our best players play. We approach it with an attitude of required effort. If you won’t play hard on special teams, you won’t play at all on offense or defense. It’s what we need to do to win. Here’s a look at how we implemented this on our kickoff team.

 

KICKOFF

The last two seasons, we have not had a kicker with a monster leg. We have to go cover kicks. In past years, lining up five players on one side and five on the other didn’t work for us. Our best players were getting double-teamed. Wedge returns were killing us because we preached lane integrity. This past off-season we felt like we needed to make a change to get our best players a better chance of getting to the ball, not depending on the return taking the ball to them. So, we elected to let them go straight to the ball.

We now give our best three tacklers the opportunity to line up wherever they want, run directly to the ball, and make tackles. We call them “Hitmen.” They have no set alignment or assignment. They are encouraged to align differently on every kick so our opponents can’t account for them with the same player each time. The other 7 players on the coverage team still have a lane they are responsible for, but the other 3 are free to take whatever attack angle they deem appropriate.

Diagram 1

 

Our 7 “regular” players line up 4 yards deep instead of the traditional 5 to allow our Hitmen to move freely around the formation during the approach.  Our kicker always kicks from the dead middle of the field.

We do NOT believe in safeties. Our edge players are full speed on the rundown, but smart about making sure nothing ever gets outside them.

Here are some alignment examples that I’ll talk more in-depth about throughout the course of the article:

 

Notice how in the kickoff above, Hitmen technically represent players 4, 6, and 10 as you count from left to right. The photo below is the very next kickoff in the same game.

 

They now represent players 6, 8, and 10, which can completely change how our opponent would block them.

 

 

In the instance above, we have created a bunch at the top of the screen. By grouping 2 Hitmen together with one of our regular players, it becomes more difficult for a man return to sort out exactly which of the 3 players belongs to them. Against a traditional single wedge return, it forces the front line players to make difficult decisions about who gets blocked and who gets released to the wedge.

 

This quads-type look was particularly effective, and one that I encouraged our players to use as frequently as possible against any type of return.

In these 4 photos, you see four totally different alignments, in some cases moving freely between a 5 & 5 alignment and a 6 & 4 alignment, with little to no actual adjustment made by our coaches within the game itself.

We employ a small set of guidelines for our players to think about when we face a certain type of return. In this article, I’ll talk about the three main types of returns – full man-blocked returns, a single-wedge return with man blocking in front of it, and a traditional double-wedge with no man-blocking elements. Almost all returns will, in one way or another, fall into one of those 3 basic categories.

 

Man-blocked Returns

Man-blocked returns are inherently based on the return team’s ability to identify their assignment before the kick. We coach our hitmen to think about three things when they line up against a man-blocked return:

  • Align in such a way that a front-line player isn’t responsible for you. If you do align as that number, align in such a way that you are too far away to be blocked by him.
  • Twist or change your “pre-snap number” before the kick in order to cause confusion.
  • In some cases, our opponents would assign one player on the return team to each of our hitmen and chase them regardless of their alignment. As we identify those situations in the game, our Hitmen intentionally line up as far away from that player as they can.

 

Read More

Planning for Red Zone Efficiency

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

Introduction:

ccfbIt’s without question, the most important area of the field for offenses. Whether it’s referred to as the red zone, green zone or the fringe, one thing is certain, wins are determined by how successful your offense is in this part of the field. We researched several programs that are successful in the red zone to find out how they prepare for this area of the field. 

Contributors (in alphabetical order)

Steve Dearmon (SD), Offensive Coordinator, Arkansas Tech University: Finished 9th in Division 2 in red zone efficiency with a .898 scoring percentage.

Jim Good (JG), Offensive Coordinator, University of the Redlands (CA): Finished 1st in Division 3 in red zone efficiency with a .943 scoring percentage.

Eric Long (EL), Offensive Coordinator, St. Francis University: Finished 2nd in FCS in red zone efficiency with a .925 scoring percentage.

David Patenaude (DP), Offensive Coordinator, Coastal Carolina University: Finished 10th in FCS with a .889 scoring percentage.

Gordon Shaw (GS), Offensive Coordinator, Colorado State Pueblo: Finished with a .863 scoring percentage in the red zone.

Trevor Stillman (TS), Offensive Coordinator, Thomas More College (KY): Finished 4th in Division 3 with a .905 scoring percentage.

Christian Taylor (CT), (former) Offensive Coordinator, Illinois Wesleyan University: Finished 8th in Division 3 with a .884 scoring percentage.

What area of the field do you consider the red zone?

JG: “It starts at the +20 then evolves as we get closer.”

EL: “We talk about +25 and in because that’s where we are in real-easy field goal range. It determined based on the kicker.”

DP: “We call it the +25 and in, but I don’t see teams changing what they do until the +10 yard line going to more bracket coverage or man pressures. That’s where it changes.”

GS: “We start on the +25 yard line because the field is shrunken at that point. That’s where the defenses will start to change coverages. Many will play cover zero and run with underneath receivers.”

TS: “Red zone is the +20 and the green zone is the +10.”

CT: “We break up our red zone into five different areas and have run and pass play calls specific to each area. The red zone fringe: +30-+21 yard line, the high red zone is the +20 to +15 yard line, the mid red zone is the +14 to +10 yard line, the low red zone is the +9 to +5 yard line and the goal line is the +4 and in.

 

What is your overarching plan of attack in the red zone? How is your philosophy in this part of the field different than in the big field?

JG: “Number one is attitude. We have to have an attitude of success. Open your focus and open your concentration a little bit more. We evolve depending on where we are on the field. As we get closer to the goal line, our offense evolves.

EL: “We take the deeper opportunities out of the menu. We need to be efficient in the run game. We need to be on schedule. Because it’s so tight down there, we do a lot more QB run game and wildcat runs. We don’t do a lot of straight five-step drop in the red zone where we are reading horizontally or vertically. It’s a lot more play action down there based off our run game. If they are a zone blitz team we feel good about protections because we are simple in our schemes. If they are a man blitz team, we just look for matchups.”

DP: “It’s all predicated on whether or not the defense is going to change. If the defensive philosophy is that they will be a four front and play cover four all the way to the two-yard line (which we will see) then we will stay with what we run. Because we are no huddle and we move so fast we don’t see a lot of teams changing.  When you look at it statistically, the plays that you call on second down are going to predicate whether or not you can get to fourth and short. We want to always try to get to fourth and makeable. Even if it’s up the field we don’t’ want it to be fourth and four, not fourth and one. So what you call on third down will make a difference as to whether or not you can get it to a makeable fourth down. We’re always trying to statistically get us to the best advantage. If we know we are in four down territory inside the ten-yard line you’re thought process is going to change because you have four plays. Sometimes we will say we need three downs to get in and then get a kick, which we will do in situations where we are way ahead. But if you go in with four downs to score a touchdown, you have to get it to fourth and short. You want to get it to fourth and less than two. First down you can call anything you want. You can use a play action or you can run it. But on second down, you have to get yourself to a makeable third to get a makeable fourth. We want to stay away from being fourth and four or more.” 

Read More

Projected 95% Model in Game Planning – Course 1: Exploiting Defensive Structures in Game Planning

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager/Co-Founder
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

  

In order to meet the projected 95% rule in game planning, it’s important to define what efficiency is. According to Coach Longo, it’s something that should be pertinent to both the situation and play concept. This may not follow the conventional wisdom of taking the number of times a play is called and base it off the average number of yards it gained. That former belief is one that Coach Longo subscribed to back when he started coaching. But now he bases offensive efficiency off the two elements he game plans against defensive structure and defensive personnel.  “Basically, it’s the minimum amount of yardage we would accept on that route and still feel it’s efficient,” he said. “But if we were throwing a hitch on a corner that we feel we cannot gain four-plus yards on or against a coverage we should not be throwing it against than it’s not going to be efficient.”

 

What is Efficiency?

So, what is efficient? Coach Longo separates efficiency numbers in the run game and pass game. In the run game, four yards or less is efficient to him providing it’s a base down. If the offense in the four-minute mode, 3.5 yards can be quantified as efficient. “Of course, getting first downs take precedent,” he told us. “If there are three yards to get and we get a first down against a loaded box but still move the changes, that is efficient. The goal of the call is to get a first down. Or, if we are in goal-line situations a touchdown is efficient.” 

 

Pass Game Efficiency:

Since Coach Longo’s system is grounded in the Air Raid, his pass game is measured differently. It’s quantified more on the specific route that is built into the play concept. Each route has an efficiency number that doesn’t change from week to week. For example, drop back verticals have an 18-yard efficiency goal, whereas now verticals off press have a 12-yard efficiency goal. Digs have an efficiency goal of 8 yards while hitches have a goal of 5 yards. These are not general numbers that are arbitrary in nature. They are based on the route structure. “Let’s say the hitch by the wideout is open five out of five times and we throw the ball out there and complete it for five yards and he gets tackled,” said Coach Longo. “So why have a random efficiency number of 8 yards per play if the hitch is what the defense is giving up? That doesn’t tell you the play is efficient.”

These numbers are all tied into the concept being run. Take a generic levels concept as reference.

Diagram 13

 

“The first look on the concept is the hitch,” said Coach Longo. “If it’s open and gets completed for five yards it’s considered efficient. The second read is the dig. If the dig is completed, at eight yards it’s efficient. All we want to do is complete it to the route for the yardage the defense would give us.”

 

Post-Season Efficiency Study:

The point of this method is for coaches to take each concept in their offense and design their own efficiency goal based on each individual concept. At the end of each season, Coach Longo will conduct an efficiency study based on each play concept. This information can be used to change or adjust efficiency models moving forward. “We will go back and look at the 11 Levels concepts that we ran and decide if the ball went to the proper place,” he said. “If the ball didn’t go to the proper place, it was an inefficient play. If we got lucky and threw into coverage and the ball got tipped but we caught it, we are not calling that an efficient play. If we throw a swing into coverage and the running back breaks a tackle and gets yardage, that is not efficient for us. We have to throw the ball to the right guy in the right progression. When we do, we should get the yardage prescribed. If we run 10 Levels concepts and the ball goes to the snag five times and he gets the yardage prescribed, that is five efficient plays. If the quarterback goes to the dig and overthrows it or we drop it and it’s incomplete it’s inefficient.”

His game plan is more about his players and not their players. This is why he builds in play concepts that can answer multiple defensive presentations. “A play has to be able to answer everything,” he said. “And 95% is everything to me. You need something you can answer most everything. When it’s not everything that means a defense needs to be extreme to beat us. So, we spend our time looking for the answer for the extreme. They have to do something extreme where we don’t have an answer. Our responsibility is to have that answer.”

In this course, we present our research on how Coach Longo applies the projected 95% method to game plan against defensive structures. We will also take readers in-depth into a work week of how Coach Longo and his offensive staff prepared against a particular opponent’s tendencies this past season in the SEC. But before we do, we wanted to make an important clarification: Coach Longo doesn’t spend a lot of time studying call patterns of opposing defensive coordinators. He’s more interested in studying the “defensive approach” structurally that these coordinators engage in. “To us, it’s all about the system,” he told us. “Like are they four-match teams or cover one man free teams? Or are they a big cloud team?”

 

Delegating Work Flow:

The process of preparing against potential opponents starts in the spring for Coach Longo. When spring ball ends, he’ll start organizing his thoughts to prepare against next fall’s opponents. The process gets culminated after the summer when he’ll have the base of his game plan thoughts together. By the time fall camp rolls around, he’ll have a “good feel” of how they may attack each opponent. We will elaborate upon the process he uses, the same one he used while as a high school coach in New Jersey. Sure, the process has changed somewhat as an FBS level offensive coordinator. “The biggest difference from each level is resources,” he said. “As you move up they spend more money on those staffs. I can focus on watching the film and getting to know the opponent which in my opinion is the most important thing I can do. I’m not distracted by the other things because my (former) graduate assistant (now offensive analyst) Josh Snow does a great job handling those duties.” Now he doesn’t make the cutups he uses during meetings. He leaves that to Coach Snow. “He emails me a script template. I write it and send it back to him. The majority of the time now I spend recruiting and coordinating the offense.”

Read More

Projected 95% Model in Game Planning – Course 2: Exploiting the Human Behavioral Patterns of Defenders

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager/Co-Founder
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

  

Coach Longo is a constant observer of people. He’s quick to notice one’s posture, one’s gait, vocabulary, and even habits. He’ll remember things you brought up in conversation several years prior. He’s done so with me. It’s something you rarely realize he’s doing. These same traits make him a successful offensive coordinator because he takes these habits with him on the sideline. While some coaches prefer watching the ball after they make their call, Coach Longo spends his time watching you, the defense react to it. To him, it is how defenders react that’s what important. He self-admittedly will continue to stretch corners on vertical routes just to set up throws underneath them. And that is just one particular example. He’ll do the same for almost every other position on the field.

In this course, we are going to present our research on how Coach Longo and his staff spend time dissecting the behavior patterns of defensive personnel to design game plans to exploit them. As noted in the previous course, attacking the scheme is already built into the offense. His players already know how to beat certain coverages. It’s how to beat human nature that Coach Longo spends the majority of his game plan. 

 

A Seasonal Plan to Manipulate the Human Element:

Just as in the previous course of this report, Coach Longo begins this process directly after spring ball which has just concluded in Durham. The staff will work through the entire personnel of upcoming opponents. Once coach will study the secondary structure and diagram the defense while another coach will be asked to break down the returning personnel. He’ll watch every game from the previous season in doing so, particularly studying the returners. “We will study these defenders all summer to see what they cover well and what they don’t,” he said. “That’s why we like to go through the entire season because we can pick up on the human tendency. It’s hard to hide these habits during the full length of a season.”

This is something that Coach Longo prides himself on. It’s a cathartic task he gets completely wrapped up in. Similar to a scientist dissecting elements in a Petri dish, Coach Longo combs through each game to examine cracks in behavior patterns of defenders. “You can coach against four teams in a row that all play cover two but all four corners may play it differently,” he said. “The playbook says you should be able to beat cover two with a corner route but you may not be able to complete a corner route against a corner that plays it a certain way. The right corner may be coached by the same defensive back coach but because one of them is longer, rangier and faster he is going to play it differently than this guy. We’re going to look at him and say he can’t cover the corner route. We know what their strengths and weaknesses are. We are going to attack the people, not the scheme every week.”

We felt it important to reference the fact that this process has been expedited with the use of Pro Football Focus which is a tool that analyzes every player and every play of every game to deliver player grades, stats, and rankings for the NFL, fantasy football, and NFL Draft. Using this service, Coach Longo is able to simply pull up an individual defender and watch every clip he was involved in the previous season. “I used to tell my GA’s to make cutups of the two corners and the two safeties so every play we can watch them,” he said. “Now we have plays broken down into targets. All I’m doing is studying one particular player. When you watch just one player, you can find a particular mismatch against one of our players.”

 

Common Principles When Exploiting Personnel:

This information gets translated into some general thought processes on how to manipulate specific defensive personnel. While we detail how this correlates to specific game planning, we wanted to provide a brief overview of how Coach Longo conceptualizes position groups in his game planning. There are some common mantra’s he will use below in his early preparation.

 

“Run at the Speeds; Not at the Bigs”

Among all position groupings, Coach Longo will spend the least amount of time watching the defensive line. But it’s not because they aren’t important. The offensive line coach will do that during game week. He will direct his attention specifically to defensive ends because, in his opinion, they can more quickly affect games. He will work to find out if there is a discrepancy between the two either in size or ability and design his run game around that facet. “We want to run at speed defensive ends,” he said. “We want to generate force at him so he can generate force back at me. We want him to continually take on a tight end on a drive block to wear him down. We’ll take the big heavy defensive end who doesn’t run as well and cut him off on the backside.  We don’t want to run power against a big physical kid. If teams play left and right, I’m going at the speed kid and not the size. If it’s a team that puts the speed to the weak side, we will run to the weak side.  If it’s a formation defense, we figure out when they are going to put the speed to the trips and we’re going to run it there. You find out what they do because they can’t do everything.”

The same principles apply to interior defenders who can be issues in gap schemes, Coach Longo will make decisions on which kinds of blocks to use against them. “If we have a big heavy 3-technique we will block back on him because even a stalemate is a win,” he said. “We’ll try to get a double team on that little fast kid and move him out of there.”

Read More

Projected 95% Model in Game Planning – Course 3: In-Game Call Patterns

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager/Co-Founder
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

  

Once the game planning design is in or the “hay is in the barn” the next phase of the 95% method is executing the game plan. Here, all of Coach Longo’s previous planning comes to fruition. He’s asked to make real-time decisions on which concepts to call and adjust to any changes in defensive structure or personnel. We were given full access this past season into Coach Longo’s game day operations procedure. We shadowed him as he prepared for an SEC opponent while at the University of Mississippi.

In this course, we present our research on the pre-game and game day activities he takes part in during the game week.

 

Pre-Game Operations

 

“Calling the Game” Simulation:

We found this activity to be instrumental for the in-game call procedure Coach Longo uses with his staff. It’s a 30-minute session once a week where he and his graduate assistant (now offensive analyst) Josh Snow will sit down and simulate calling the game in real time. Coach Longo will present cutups of how the next opponent defended particular formations during the course of the season. He’ll use his playlist and call a play concept while Coach Snow follows the protocol he uses during game day such as verbalizing the coverage and where the quarterback should go with the ball. It’s real-time dialogue, without a pause button, that gets fined tuned so there is no wasted verbiage on game day.

“I like to have my graduate assistant in here with me so he gets a feel of how I will call a game,” said Coach Longo. “The more we do that the more he sees things the way I do. I need him to do that so he can give feedback to me thinking about the game, the plan or the play calls the way in which I think about it. You have to know why I’m calling the game. You have to have a complete understanding of the offense to be a great spotter.”

According to Coach Snow, the process is immeasurable in helping him harmonize with Coach Longo on game day. “I get the reps just like the quarterback is getting the reps during the course of the week,” he said. “That’s really important to me. I hear all of Coach Longo’s coaching points. And the more times I can see the game at game speed the more it helps me in the booth.”

 

Applying the Read Sheet:

What Coach Snow is specifically looking at during these sessions is what Coach Longo calls the “read sheet.” It’s a play sheet that lists each play concept Coach Longo plans on using that week and next that concept is the most influential defender that can affect that play. It is Coach Snow’s responsibility in the booth to monitor that defender as the play unfolds.

While we can’t produce the actual read sheet for this report, we did notice the following:

  • In zone schemes, the read defender will be the C gap defender
  • In gap schemes, the read defender will be the backside linebacker.
  • In bubble screens, the read defender might be the play side alley defender.
  • In most dropbacks, the read defender might be the backside safety.

 

Once these defenders are identified, Coach Snow will monitor their post-snap actions. One example on the levels concept would be which route the Mike linebacker took. Or in the Shallow route, the defender that squeezed the dig would be the read defender.

Although Coach Snow has graduated from the read sheet- he’s been with Coach Longo for over five years- he says it’s helped train his eyes to interpret and discern information quickly. “It was awesome for me because it helped me learn the offense,” he said. “That is the easy way to understand how to help him.” While every concept has a read defender, sometimes those defenders will change on a weekly basis based on how a defense is deciding to take away particular schemes.

Coach Longo did make a point to say that those determinations are not always made after one rep of him doing it. It’s a pattern of behavior. “The defensive coordinator might be in a coverage where that safety needs to come downhill right now on one play,” said Coach Longo. “He may track harder in cover four than he would in cover two. We have answers for that.”

Coach Snow is also responsible for running the scout team defense where he will make the defensive scout sheet to fully immerse himself with the opponent’s defensive structure and personnel. “Many times, when we are devising personnel match-ups, I will put our match-up advantages in different color jerseys in practice so that we know who to exploit,” said Coach Snow.

 

Game Day Operations

 

The Walk-Through:

Even for home games, the University of Mississippi football team travels to stay in a hotel more than 45 minutes away from Oxford. It is at this location where the club will have its pre-game walk-through nearly three hours before game time. In the parking lot of the hotel, Coach Longo and his offensive staff recount every possible scenario that may present itself during the game. It’s a thorough, 30-minute session where Coach Longo will rattle off his entire play menu and signal in the tempo and formation in which these concepts planned to be used. The offense walks through their responsibilities in regimented fashion against a makeshift defense.

Read More

Projected 95% Model in Game Planning – Course 4: Streamlining the System

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager/Co-Founder
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

  

Editor’s Note: In order to provide background context on how Coach Longo implements his projected 95% efficiency method in game planning, we felt it necessary to give a brief overview of his offensive system in this course.

If you’re looking for a more in-depth look at Coach Longo’s system, more research can be found here.

 

Efficiency: it’s the basis of Coach Longo’s offensive system. We will not use “simple,” even though simple does come with a positive connotation among football coaches. It’s efficient. We all want our systems to be simple for our players to absorb but the challenge becomes making the presentation complex to the defense. Over the last thirty plus years as an offensive coordinator at all levels of football, Coach Longo has found a way to balance those two priorities in producing a top ten offense nationally six times in his coaching career. This includes being in the top five the last four consecutive seasons at Sam Houston State (TX) and University of Mississippi respectively. Now as he prepares for his first season calling the shots at the University of North Carolina, he continues to hone his system around new personnel and new opponents.

It was this past season while he was in Oxford (MS) when we had an opportunity to mirror how this system is translated into his game week preparation and game day protocols. We started with the premise of shadowing an FBS offensive coordinator to explore the procedures he and his staff use during game week. What we initially found was that the process isn’t that much different than at your high school or mine. Sure, the resources are greater, but his process hasn’t changed much. And as we continued to dig deeper into his process, we found one common threat in our research: he is exceptional at trimming the fat in his game planning. He doesn’t carry a lot of formations or concepts. He only carries the great ones, or as he calls the 95 percenters into game day. This is the process behind how he crafts, selects and calls those plays on game day. It’s a procedure that has yielded one of the country’s most efficient offenses- finishing in the top 10 nationally in yards per play the last two seasons.

 

Model of Efficiency:

After studying Coach Longo’s system twice, it’s clear that his success has a good deal in part with the “simplicity” of his system. Coaches all talk about cutting things down, but Coach Longo and his staff strive to abide by it. A streamlined system makes things easier to operate on game day. The fewer things you do on offense, the quicker it is to make corrections. “A defense can only do a certain number of things and we would like to think we have a good feel for anticipating what those things are,” he told us.  The top game day coaches know how to adjust in real time and what smoother way to make these adjustments than to have the answers before they are presented on the field?

Coach Longo’s system has some of these answers. They are developed through a process that is repeated over and over again each game week. As he told us, the offense stays 80% the same regardless of the week it’s just the opponent that changes. Sure, he may add a couple of weekly tweaks but the philosophy remains steadfast: take space where you can get it. This means there are really no “call it and run it” scenarios in this offense. The quarterback is given choices and is expected to make those choices based on where space presents itself.

This space is generated in two distinct ways: defensive structure and defensive personnel. Coach Longo spends more time understanding common principles of defenses than focusing on who the defensive coordinator is. Coach Longo attacks defenses by classifications, such as cover four match teams, cover one team or pressure teams, etc. which is revealed more in Course 2.  How the defender’s individual personality reacts to the concepts he presents is even of greater interest to him.  As he told us, “a cover two corner may play cover two an entirely separate way than the corner on the other side of the field. How he reacts to things dictate my play calls.” 

 

50/50 Balance is Not a Priority:

His approach differs from other coordinators who try to stress having run/pass balance. Yes, he is an Air Raid coach by nature, but it’s more important to take what defenses give him. He’d rather throw an eight-yard bubble route than pound the ball into loaded boxes. On game day, he doesn’t calculate touches for his top players- even though he’s had a receiver in the top ten nationally in receptions the last two seasons. The system is about building in options within the play call that are best for that particular situation. “We want to give the ball wherever you’re going to give up space,” he told us. And that alone produces ball distribution. “Even if the number four receiver is not as good as the number three receiver, he can still catch the ball and hurt the defense. When you distribute the ball to all the players, the defense needs to defend all the players. And when a defense overplays one from a human nature standpoint or scheme, you are giving up grass somewhere else and all those guys are taught to attack the open grass.”

In this course, we wanted to present a general overview of Coach Longo’s offense. We thought it was important to understand how the system is built in order to understand how he game plans or makes his adjustments on game day. His offense can be categorized into the following:

  • 3 base formations
  • 3 motions
  • 5 formation tags
  • 5 backfield sets

 

Read More

Projected 95% Model in Game Planning – Bonus Course: Adapting to the High School Level

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager/Co-Founder
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

  

After working with Coach Longo on this project, I felt compelled to provide a translation for high school coaches on how to take some of these same principles and gear them to their own game planning method. As an offensive coordinator myself, it opened up my eyes to new ways of game planning. I thought back to this season, how many times I called might have called a bad play, particularly in big spots. It still haunts me six months later.

So, my plan was to take the same model that Coach Longo used and apply it to the high school coach. Many of us don’t have the same resources he does, like the use of two graduate assistants and Pro Football Focus, but I found there are ways to adapt some of these principles for game planning around our systems. There is an extensive amount of information in the previous courses of this study so I segmented our research into seven key tenets that can be adapted into any game planning process.

In order to gauge how coaches were conducting game planning, we conducted some pre-research by sending out a survey to all of the offensive coordinators in our network. Over 500 coaches responded and the results were what we figured – coaches are spending too much time changing their systems from one week to the next in preparing for their opponents.

 

Tenet 1—Less is Always More: Streamline Your Play Menu

We found that 60% of coaches still choose to carry over 20 or more concepts into their offensive game week preparations. Consider this: according to HUDL, the average number of high school offensive plays per game is 72. This means that each play can barely be run four times during the course of a game if you’re going to use all of the concepts on your play menu that week. If the argument is in most cases offensive coordinators will not use all of the plays in the menu, our simple rebuttal would be: then why include them in the menu?

Sounds simple enough, right? But this may be a struggle for some offensive coordinators like myself. We love everything. We see it, we take it, we implement it and off we go. I get it and so does Coach Longo. But Coach Longo is hell-bent on having no more than twenty concepts in his playlist that week and self-admits using “repeaters” between 8-10 times a game. As coaches we all know that the less you do, the better you get at it. Yet, it’s a constant struggle to keep your play menu limited.

How many times have you seen the quarterback get to the line of scrimmage only to realize that you’re in the wrong play call? While I realize that many coaches are giving their QB’s “outs” by building relief throws into concepts, the difference with Coach Longo’s system is that he builds universal concepts into his play call. He has concepts that can be effective against any coverage. We all can do this by breaking down our game planning by packaging concepts based in thirds: the right perimeter, run box and left the perimeter.

 

Tenet 2—What Is Your 95%? Defining Efficiency

61% of coaches still use yardage to define a play’s efficiency. But there are so many factors… down and distance, field position, etc. that go into why a play was efficient and why it may not be efficient. As Coach Longo told us, to tag an arbitrary number (based on an average of total plays and yards gained) doesn’t correctly measure whether a play was efficient for those particular circumstances. Yet why are so many coaches still relying on yards gained to determine if a play was effective or not?

Do you measure a play's efficiency based on yardage?

 

Coach Longo talked in great length about designing his game plan around concepts that have a projected 95% efficiency rating. But how do you measure efficiency? For years, I’ve heard coaches use four yards per play as the gold standard for a play’s efficiency. Do the math and it’s a simple solution to gain first downs. Yet, according to HUDL’s 2019 performance report, the average yards per play gains 6.01 yards nationally. So, what measures efficiency in your program? While Coach Longo adheres to the four yards per play declaration in the run game, pass game efficiency is completely reliant on the individual pass routes in the concept. A dig is 8 yards, a drop back vertical is 12 yards, etc. It’s all based on where the ball is being thrown.

While there are numerous factors that tie into efficiency- all of which we explain in the report- I think it’s important for coaches to generate an efficiency plan before the season for each of their play concepts. Not only does it provide for realistic expectations for players and coaches but can also serve as the basis for eliminating or keeping plays during the offseason review.

Read More

Simplifying Offensive Communication

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikeKKuchar

 

 

Case 1: Communicating Personnel Groupings and Formations

Introduction

628x471In this case, we focused our research on how coaches were grouping formations and personnel to make them more relatable to players. We’ve found coaches can have upwards of 8 personnel groupings and over two dozen formations. We wanted to find ways in which coaches are simplifying their offensive packages to utilize as many groupings/formations as possible without jeopardizing the learning curve of their athletes.

Number of Personnel Groupings

Our research below indicates the amount of personnel groupings coaches are using per game. The majority of coaches, 38 percent, use four personnel groupings per game.

Reader Responses:

We surveyed coaches and asked the following question:

Q: What has been the most efficient way to group or relate the names you use in your personnel groupings to make it more understandable for your players?

The responses are below. We kept them anonymous in order to protect identity.

Color System:

“We use colors, with the darker the color the more run-focused the grouping can be. For example, Black is our Maryland-I formation, which almost 90% run. White and Grey colors are two back pistol formations, which are closer to 50/50 run/pass.”

Default Formations:

“All our formation calls come off our base formation, which is double twins. The X and H are on left side and Y and Z are on right. We use one word for the formation such as ‘Ace.’ Then we have specific words that tell our wide receivers and tight ends where to be. Such as ‘Ace Hit,’ this tells the H to come across formation. This has worked better for us than when we just said ‘Pro Right or Left’ because it tells each kid where to be. Bronco and Buffalo tells our B back (H back) where to align. An example would be Bronco ‘Yo.’ B would be to right and Y would go over to left to create a Pro twins look.”

Weather Names:

“We use weather names; 10 means lightning; 11 means thunder and 20 means tornado.”

Vocalizing Formations:

“We simply yell out ‘two-back’ if we want the H-back into the game and we’ll call out a receiver (usually a slot) for him to replace.”

Picture Boards:

“We use boards with pictures to move players from the same personnel groupings and formations to different places within the called formation.”

Hand Signals:

“We use hand signals and fingers to represent formations. After we put up the different fingers we make a fist to add a tight end to the formation. An example is four fingers represent a 2×2 formation. Now if we make a fist right after putting up the two fingers we know one side will have a tight end.”

Word Associations Based on Positions

“We use names that relate to the primary focus of the personnel group. For instance, ‘hammer’ could equal a big fullback and our best tailback. ‘Jumbo’ could equal our biggest skill guys. ‘Falcon’ could equal three wide receivers and ‘Trojan’ could equal our three best running backs.”

“The best way is to associate by position or by physical attributes of your different players. Examples include ‘big’ personnel for your taller receivers or extra tight ends. ‘Extra’ personnel for your entire X are to be in the game at certain positions. ‘Zebra’ personnel for all of your Z’s to be in the game at certain positions. ‘Speed’ personnel is used for your fastest guys at certain positions, and so-on and so-forth.”

“We use names to identify personnel groups that are used for multiple formations. ‘Sam’ equals no tight end. ‘Ted’ equals one tight end. ‘Henry’ equals one H-back. ‘Hannah’ equals one tight end and one H-back.”

“Like most teams, we designate positions with letters. We name the personnel groups with words containing the letter or letters of the position or positions within the group who is/are the ‘adjuster(s).’ Let’s say that the personnel group is Horns. This group includes Z & J (outside receivers) S & H (slots) and R (RB). The H is the ‘adjuster’ In Horns personnel Tiger, the H aligns in the slot to the right side of the formation regardless of hash. In Horns personnel Lion, the H aligns in the slot to the left side of the formation regardless of hash. In Frogs personnel, the Z & J are still on the field and S is still on the field, but H Back is replaced by the F and the F is the ‘adjuster.’ In Frogs personnel Tiger, the F aligns in the slot to the right side of the formation regardless of hash. In Frogs personnel Lion, the F aligns in the slot to the left of the formation regardless of hash. Tiger and Lion are 2 x 2 formations. In 3 x 1 sets, all positions have a ‘home base’ and we have tags to move them around within the formation. In Thunder personnel, the Z remains on the field, but now the tight end (T) and the H Back (H) are part of the group along with S and R (RB). Both T and H are ‘adjusters’ in Thunder personnel formations.”

Read More

Double Teaming Punt Team Gunners

By Chris Fore
Special Teams Coordinator
Sultana High School (CA)
Twitter: @coachfore

 

Introduction:

Punt return is a critical play when it comes to stealing yards in a football game. In 2014, we improved our average start from the 34.48 yard line to the 45.05 yard line, an increase of 31%! We returned three punts for touchdowns, up from just one in the previous season. We increased our average return per punt from just 5.5 yards to 19.38 yards, the best punt return average in the state of California, and in the top 10 in the nation. The following year we found similar games at a different school Sultana High School (a new school), where we increased punt return yards per attempt from 7.25 to 14.66. 

Think about that difference.  We DOUBLED our punt return yards every time we touched the ball.  (Meanwhile we cut our opponent’s punt return average from 15.8 to 2.3!)  Our average start after punts was the 35.03 yard line, 6 yards better than 2014.  We cut our opponent’s average start after punts from the 37 to the 26.09 yard line, a difference of an entire first down!  So, add our improvement of 7.41 yards per punt plus taking away 10.91 yards per punt from our opponent, and we improved our field position by 18.32 yards during the punting game. 

Doubling Gunners:

The traditional pro style punt, two gunners who are out wide, 2 wings, 5 linemen, personal protector, punt is my absolute favorite scheme to see on film before we play a team.  Why?  Because I’ve got what I think is a great Punt Return to gain some dynamite yards. 

There are strengths and weaknesses with every single football play. I think that the Pro Style punt is the absolute worst way to punt the football. Usually, there are only three players (the gunners and the long snapper) heading down the field at the snap of the ball to tackle the returner. The other eight players are a part of the kicking process, with seven of them blocking for the kicker. So, you have two pretty fast players running down to tackle the ball carrier, and usually a lumbering long snapper. That is the strength of this punt: the gunners. It’s very difficult to keep these gunners from getting to your ball carrier.  It is hard to ask one player to go backwards while also blocking somebody who is going full speed forwards. 

So, we don’t!  We double team the gunners.  Let me show you how I like to attack the pro style punt scheme.

In the second week of our 2015 season, we faced one of the absolute best punters I’ve ever seen in 15 years of coaching this great game. Better yet was how fast his gunners got down field. The week before we played them, they had just HUGE change of field position plays every time they punted. In fact, through 4 punts in week 1, he averaged 46 yards per punt.

My favorite thing to do as a Special Teams Coordinator, outside of game night, is to analyze film in order to put together a game plan.  I always ask: how can we line up against this play, and have success?  Against this specific team, with their gunners, I knew that we had to double team them to have a chance.

The results were drastic. We cut their Net Punt Yard Average from 46 yards per punt t0 20.66 yard per punt!  We cut their punt average in half, and then some and, more importantly, we won 26-17.

Here is what we drew up for our opponent, in order to double the gunners.  We drew it up both left (Louie) and right (Ralph)

Slide1Slide2

Let’s talk thru Ralph, our right return.

Corner’s Responsibilities:

  1. Corner takes away the inside release by his alignment first.  The corners will line up on the inside shade of the gunner.  They will not turn their body too much one way or the other, but the goal here is to take away the inside release.  The corner has got to maintain inside leverage on the gunner
  2. This forces the gunner to take an outside release.
  3. This gives the corner inside leverage on the gunner.
  4. Teach the corner to ride that man to the sidelines.
  5. Usually the gunner will beat the corner to the outside.
  6. This is where the Outside Linebacker comes in to play

Left Outside Linebacker Responsibilities:

Read More

Special Teams Unit Development (STUD) Training

 

By Ryan Turnbull
Special Teams Coordinator/DFO/Defensive Backs Coach
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI)
Twitter: @CoachBullRPI

Introduction:

rpifbThrough very detailed drill work, STUD/STUD 2.0 allows the special teams unit to work on multiple facets of pursuit/return based special teams drills simultaneously. Players must hone in mentally on the specific coaching points that are being relayed. In addition, coaches must provide detailed and thorough direction towards the specific coaching points that will be practiced. Both players and coaches must respect spacing on the field of other drills to ensure full efficiency of STUD/STUD 2.0.

The drills contained are meant to be detailed, specific, and work on three concepts at most at a time.  These drills are open to variation and discussion within a staff.  Other drills practicing the same or equally important concepts are encouraged to be considered through discussion.

Concept Details

The first 7 minutes of STUD will consist of the avoid and leverage drill, step and hold drill, snap catch and step drill, and kickoffs/kickoff returns (Diagram 1). The last 7 minutes will consist of speed in space, field goals and punt/punt returns (Diagram 2). At least one coach, if not two, will be assigned to work with each group and coaches are specific to the drill (i.e. o-line coach works with PAT/FG).

Slide1Slide2

Avoid and Leverage Drill: The areas this drill will target are acceleration, athleticism in a short window, and leveraging the football during pursuit. Players must accelerate to the first obstacle then “rip and stack” through that obstacle. Next, they will accelerate to the second obstacle followed by a break down and leverage. The coach will break down the drill in parts as he sees fit (Diagram 3).

Slide3

Read More

Perimeter Blocking in the Jet Sweep/Power Read Game

By Jeffrey Russell

Offensive Coordinator and Quarterbacks Coach

Wethersfield High School (CT)

Twitter: @coach_jrussell

 

Introduction: 

Jet Sweep 1At Wethersfield, we’ve become a three headed monster that attacks our opponents with quick passes, perimeter runs, and run/pass concepts. To counter these strengths, defenses often will try to create a numbers advantage by having defenders be responsible for a part of the run game and a part of the pass game simultaneously. It is our goal to diagnose their strategy early in the game and then use those responsibilities against them with each of the three offenses phases I mentioned above. We assess things like:

  1. How much of the wide side of the field or boundary a defense is willing to give up?
  2. How many players are they willing to sacrifice vs. 3 and 4 receivers? 
  3. Which formations, be it Trips, Quads or an unbalanced variation that allows our back side receiver to motion, will best expose the defenses weak point?

Outnumbering Defenses by Alignment

Our offense moves very quickly, but we don’t want to sacrifice options to get into advantageous formations. For that reason, our skill position players have a couple of simple rules they follow in regards to know where to align. They are as follows:

1.  Our receivers are labeled from X, H, Y & Z, from left to right, and they never overlap or change order. The players must be able to operate out of the different positions.

2.  Our running back (R) will become the inside most receiver closest to the backfield in any of our Empty formations (3×2 or 4×1).

3.  A simple hand signal will tell the widest player who’s NOT already on the line of scrimmage to move up onto the line of scrimmage. This same hand signal, will tell the single receiver on the opposite side of the formation to move OFF of the line of scrimmage, allowing him to motion. 

These formation variations create issues for defensive coordinators in real time, and put the responsibility on the players on the field to make the correct adjustment. 

Slide1Slide2Slide3Slide4Slide5

Outnumbering Defenses with the Jet Sweep:

With all the extra blockers we get on the edge, our Jet Sweep has become a great play for us. Our Jet Sweep concept is actually a passing play for the receivers and a running play for the running back. This concept keeps the players “statistically”happy (receivers get receiving yards and running backs get rushing yards), and also puts them in the best position to be successful. When a receiver is tagged to run a jet sweep, they will run full speed jet motion and the QB will actually flip/pass the ball in front to them. This allows the receivers to do what they do best, and doesn’t force us to spend a lot of practice time on repping handoffs. This also assures us that any dropped exchange is an incomplete pass and not a fumble. This rule applies in conversely for running back. They will receive a handoff when tagged to run the Jet Sweep from the back field.

Read More

St. Thomas Pressure Package – Case 1: 5-Man Pressure Patterns and Zone Blitz Technique

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

  

The University of St. Thomas defense is a pressure outfit. It’s been that way throughout defensive coordinator Wallie Kuchinski’s ten-year tenure. The Tommie D prides itself on getting off the ball and getting after the quarterback on third downs. But it was only recently that Coach Kuchinski and his staff decided to sell out completely by bringing pressure on run downs. In 2017, the Tommie’s brought pressure on 85 percent of these downs. Yes, that’s 85 percent. It’s completely unchartered waters for most defenses. But, for the Tommie’s, it’s home.

 According to Coach Kuchinski, the reasoning is simple. It’s a methodology wrapped around the importance of what he calls “non-circumstantial downs,” which are first and second downs for offenses. “If it’s a down where you don’t know if they are going to run or throw, why not bring pressure?” he asked. “You need to dominate them in the run game. The only thing I need to know is down and distance and personnel. If I can get a call that is good against the run and pass, why not do it all the time? If we’re sitting back in an over front quarters defense and have to fit everything tight in the run game to make it work why do it? And in the passing game we’re only bringing four then we have to find a way to get to the quarterback with using twists. Here at St. Thomas, we get to bring our run and our pass stuff all on the same down.”

The premise is to get the offense behind the chains on first down. “Our entire emphasis is to try and get negative plays on first and second down,” he told us. “And not just negative yardage plays. We’re talking about false start penalties, holding calls, poor exchanges. That all happened this year because of how fast and aggressive we were.” Apparently so aggressive it got offenses off the field in a hurry. Using this mindset, the Tommies only had to defend 55 plays a game this season, down from 65 per game on average the last few seasons, and were getting off the field on 80 percent of third downs.

In case one, we present our research on the Odd system structure being used at St. Thomas. We also detail the five most common pressure patterns the Tommies use in its five-man zone pressure menu. We also break down the technical concepts that pressure and non-pressure defenders are taught to execute in these schemes and the drill work that corresponds with them.

 

Defensive Personnel

Contrary to most odd front structures, the Tommies are not a mirrored front defense. Coach Kuchinski plays with what he calls a strong side and a quick side. The quick side is trained more to handle perimeter space while the strong side is accustomed to working against heavier run surfaces. Below are quick job descriptions of these defenders:

  

Tackles: The two defensive tackles are 4 technique alignment defenders that will need to be able to move post-snap into the interior as well as exterior gaps. They are put in 4-techniques to present the allusion of movement.

Nose: The zero technique defender who may be a little more stout than the tackles. Again, he’s not a two-gap player here. He will move post-snap.

Quick LB: Weak side or field side linebacker (Nickel) who will be asked to make tackles in space and be able to cover slot receivers. He’s the most versatile position in the system.

Sam LB: Strong side inside linebacker that Coach Kuchinski refers to as the “mini me” in this system. He is more of a run defender than the Will or weakside inside linebacker. Most run fits are geared to him being the free hitter.

Stud LB: Strong side outside linebacker who will be asked to align against three-man surface structures. He will also be reduced down to play 5-technique alignments on offensive tackles. He will usually possess a stronger body than the Quick LB.

Will LB: Weakside inside linebacker. Very similar in style to the Sam but may have a different skill set in the open field.

CBs: More of the rangier, lengthier defenders in this system, although Coach Kuchinski has played with smaller defenders here. Were asked to press on 81% of snaps last season.

Free Safety: Weak side safety

Rover: Strong side safety

Read More

St. Thomas Pressure Package – Case 2: Full Field and Split Field Pressure Coverage Concepts

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

  

In addition to the pressure patterns used by the front seven, the responsibility of the backend to handle the coverage component of zone pressures is placed at a premium. Depending on offensive personnel and formation, many of these coverage defenders will be tied into the run fit of the pressure. While the defensive staff at the University of St. Thomas mixes and matches coverages, there is one constant pre-snap allusion: The allusion of a two high safety defense. But after the snap, all bets are off.  “We are going to bring five defenders on mostly every snap, but you don’t know where it’s coming from and what coverage is tagged with it,” said defensive coordinator Wallie Kuchinski. “That’s when they [offenses] start grabbing for things that are not there.”

It’s important to note the Tommie defense at its base is rooted in a man coverage philosophy and plays with man eyes. “We were always a man concept team,” he told us. “In 2014, we were more of a zone check team in base defense and we struggled because the first thing offenses do in game planning is watching a formation tape to see what coverage structure you will be in on non-consequential [early] downs. They watch how you line up against their formations.” It was because of this that Coach Kuchinski and the defensive staff went back to playing with more “man eyes” on the back end. According to Coach Kuchinski, it helps in getting the ball out more quickly and produces a lot of hits on the quarterback. St. Thomas produced 36 sacks last season. “There are a lot of holes in zone coverage and the quarterback can complete the football,” he said. 

So in case two, we present our research on the coverages that the University of St. Thomas will utilize on the backend of its zone pressure patterns.

 

Editor’s Note: Any of the following coverages could be used with the pressure patterns detailed in case one. The decision process on which to use is elaborated on in case three.

  

Coverage Defender Personnel

Quick LB: Weak side or field side linebacker (Nickel) who will be asked to make tackles in space and be able to cover slot receivers. He’s the most versatile position in the system.

Sam LB: Strong side inside linebacker that Coach Kuchinski refers to as the “mini-me” in this system. He is more of a run defender than the Will or weakside inside linebacker. Most run fits are geared to him being the free hitter.

Stud LB: Strong side outside linebacker who will be asked to align against three-man surface structures. He will also be reduced down to play 5-technique alignments on offensive tackles. He will usually possess a stronger body than the Quick LB.

Will LB: Weakside inside linebacker. Very similar in style to the Sam, but may have a different skill set in the open field.

CBs: More of the rangier, lengthier defenders in this system, although Coach Kuchinski has played with smaller defenders here. Were asked to press on 81% of snaps last season.

Free Safety: Weak side safety

Rover: Strong side safety

  

Press Corner Technique

Regardless of the coverage played behind them, the corners in the Tommie system will be asked to press the number one receivers on 80% of snaps. These press techniques can take the shape of a punch or press bail fundamental. Since the press technique is not over-coached at St. Thomas, we didn’t feel it necessary to spend too much time addressing it in this report. Quite simply, Coach Kuchinski and corners coach Marcus Jones will have them line up with 2.5 yards width and five yards deep. They call it “the box” with the purpose being to not let receivers run in that box by disrupting the route long enough for the pressure to get there. According to Coach Kuchinski, in most cases that pressure arrives between 2.2 and 2.3 seconds on the quarterback.

Read More

St. Thomas Pressure Package – Case 3: Best Practices In Matching Patterns/Coverages to Affect Run Game

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

  

In the first two cases of this study, we addressed the fun part of creating zone pressures, designing pressure patterns and mixing them with the proper corresponding coverages. Once that information is assimilated, the task for any defensive coordinator shifts to designing these pressures to attack an opponent’s offensive structure and scheme. Remember that any of these pressures can be run with a myriad of coverages. The challenge is selecting the coverages that work for that particular week while still keeping it streamlined for defenders to play fast on game day. 

In case three, we present our research on which particular pressure patterns and coverages work best against certain offensive personnel groupings and play concepts.

  

Editor’s Note: The following information is our editorial opinion based on film study. It is NOT the perspective of Coach Kuchinski or the defensive staff at the University of St. Thomas.

  

General Design Factors

The University of St. Thomas defensive coordinator Wallie Kuchinski told us that in order to stop the run he will do two things: Either run zone pressures or play double eagle defense. That’s the extent of it. Since this study is focused entirely on the former option, we wanted to research exactly how he and the defensive staff design their pressures to attack the offenses he sees in his conference. But before we present our assertions on this, Coach Kuchinski provided us with some general guidelines on how he plans his pressure package. There are certain “umbrellas” that his pressure system falls under. They are as follows:

  • Pressures are Multiple: This means that they can be called either strong or weak and the strength call can be manipulated to run pressures. For example, the strong side “Strafe” pressure pattern documented in case one doesn’t always need to be run to the tight end (or boundary), which is where he calls his strength. He can mix it with a boundary strength call and get the pressure coming from the field, etc.
  • No Checking Out of Pressures: Because of the various run fits arranged and communicated by the safeties in these pressures, all of which are detailed in case two, there is no checking the pressure side or checking out of pressure here. It’s a call it, run it scenario.
  • 70 Percent Rule: When compiling tendencies, Coach Kuchinski follows the 70 percent constant, meaning it’s only an offensive tendency (based on formation or down/distance) if it’s higher than that number. “68 percent is still 50/50 to me,” he said. “We find the breakpoint to get the 70 percent. It may not be 3rd and 7. It might be 3rd and 8 that we get that tendency.”
  • Rule of 3: This is a rule in regards to selecting the proper pressure coverage relating to offensive personnel groupings. In doing so, Coach Kuchinski adheres to the rule of 3. “If they have a personnel grouping that adds up to three or more than we need the safeties in the fit,” he said. This kind of grouping includes 21, 12 and 22 personnel. “If they have a personnel grouping like 11 or 10, we don’t need the safeties in the fit because we have seven defenders. But when they have a grouping that adds up to three or more, we need to spill the ball to somebody, so we need to play Black coverage to get the safety in the fit.”

Using those guidelines, Coach Kuchinski and the defensive staff now begin the process of plugging which players they want into the following responsibilities, all of which are detailed in case one:

  • Pressure Side Arrow Defender
  • Non-Pressure Side Arrow Defender
  • Chase/Spill Defender
  • Contain/Splatter Defender
  • Power Player

This is where a coach can get really creative based on the scheme the offense is presenting. Each pressure pattern is structured differently. For a frame of reference, the five most common pressure patterns we researched are below. Again, they are all presented to the strong side, but the pressure can easily be flipped to the weak side as well.

  

Strafe/War
Strafe/War

  

Read More

X&O Labs Presents: Hot Takes from the COOL Clinic: 2019 Version

By Mike Kuchar
Co-Founder/Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikeKKuchar

 

 

Once again, Cincinnati played host to some of the top coaches across the country when over 350 offensive line coaches poured into the Millennium Hotel Downtown to expound upon the finer components of football—leverage, footwork and hand placement. While many times our off-season editorial schedule prevents me from attending most clinics, this one is always a must attend annually. And as this was my eighth COOL clinic, it may have been the best. Normally, the speaker lineup features a packed run down from both the collegiate and professional ranks, this time around there were some nuances.  An entire crew from NFL Films was following the clinic’s host (and former Cleveland Brown offensive line coach) Bob Wylie as he continues his reality television show career stemming from the success of HBO’s Hard Knocks.

 

It also featured a first-time player presentation as Browns offensive line members Joel Bitonio, JC Tretter and Austin Corbett converged on educating the clinic base on the nuances of the inside and outside zone schemes. I was able to stay through the entire presentation list (save for Coach Butch Barry of the University of Miami), so I wanted to provide what I felt were the most important nuggets of these presentations. We segmented our research into one key trend coaches should expect to see this fall in the common areas of offensive line play.

 

Redefining Leverage

This is usually my favorite part of the clinic, where coaches like longtime NFL offensive line coach Paul Alexander tell us that he truly grasped the meaning of leverage while studying a glass bird antique in his mother-in-law’s home. (Don’t ask, long story).

coolclinic 1

Read More