Flexbone Issue – Case 5: Flexbone Preview for 2019 – What You Must Know

By Dr. Lou Cella
Sport and Performance Psychologist
tripleoptionfootball.com

 

  

Army, Navy, and Georgia Tech combined to do the following in 2018:

  • Played 39 games.
  • Executed 2,653 plays.
  • Averaged 68 offensive plays/game.
  • Ran the football 86% of the time.
  • Averaged 58 running plays/game.

 

45% of Army, Navy, and Georgia Tech’s combined offense consisted of the following three concepts:

1: Zone Option with Variations.

  • This includes Speed Option, Quarterback Power, and Quarterback Sweep.
  • Zone Option with variations was run 461 times.
  • This concept was 17.4% of Army, Navy, and Georgia Tech’s 2018 Offense.
  • Zone Option with variations is the featured constraint when they don’t get four yards on the give phase of the Triple Option.

 

2: Triple Option

  • This is the “Inside Veer” concept.
  • Triple Option was run 403 times.
  • This concept was 15.2% of Army, Navy, and Georgia Tech’s 2018 Offense.
  • Triple Option is more than just a singular concept, the Triple Option is the foundation of the offense.

 

Read More

Screen Drill: 80 Reps in 10-Minutes

By Shawn Liotta
Offensive Coordinator
Clairton High School (PA)

 

Introduction:

clairtonIn 2014 the Clairton Bears led the nation in scoring and finished second all-time nationally with 958 points scored on their way to a 15-1 record. The Bears “No-Huddle, No-Mercy” offense totaled 8,162 total yards and averaged 12.75 yards per play with a balanced attack 3,249 yards passing/ 4,913 yards rushing.

The screen game is a key component of our offensive attack at Clairton High School. We employ a diverse and effective screen package that makes up one third of our total offensive attack. We place great emphasis on the fundamentals and execution of these concepts. That means treating screens in your offensive package the same way that you would with your running game or pass attack. Too often coaches employ screens as an exotic or off-tempo type of concept that they maybe get four or five reps of the concept in practice often during team drills. These same coaches will get frustrated when they call the Screen play in the game and it does not work due to poor execution and timing. By utilizing this screen drill daily for 10 minutes, you will greatly enhance the success of the screen package in your offense.

We utilize screens as a way to get the ball to our playmakers in space and force the defense to defend our offense sideline to sideline. We enter each game with the following screen concepts.

  • Fast Screens
  • Slow Screens
  • Key Screens
  • Double Screens
  • Screens Packaged with our Run Game
  • Suckers and Gadgets

We are an up-tempo, no huddle offense with the goal of getting the ball snapped within five seconds of the ready for play signal. This philosophy carries over to our practice schedule as we attempt to set an extremely fast pace in practice so that our games appear to slow down. This allows us to get the maximum number of quality snaps during our practice sessions, however this also necessitates our coaches to coach off of film or during our group periods such as our screen drill so that we do not slow down our pace. Our screen drill provides us with an opportunity to teach each of our screen concepts in a team setting during each practice session. We use this drill to allow us to rep each of our screen concepts in each direction during a ten-minute session where we can average seven to eight snaps per minute during this period.

Read More

Using Catch Man in the Red Zone

By Darren Garrigan
Defensive Backs Coach
East Central University
Twitter: @collegeDB_coach

 

 

img 9883

Introduction

Red zone coverage has its challenges regardless of the coverage technique you use, but after I reviewed our 2012 tape, I was sure that we needed to go back to the drawing board.  I was tired of seeing DB?s get beat on the fade and back shoulder time and time again.  So I asked a variety of offensive coaches what makes things difficult for them in the red zone and their answers were rather consistent.  They said that they struggle with DB?s that sit back and are slow to turn on the receiver?s movement.  They went on to explain that by sitting just past the depth that they like to cut and collisioning the receivers at the point of the cut their timing was impacted and the success rate dropped.

This all brought me to the catch technique, which for us means standing 8-9 yards off the receiver flat footed and ready to collision and react to the receiver as he makes his break.  This forced the receivers to change the way they ran their routes and forced the quarterbacks to wait an additional second before releasing the ball.  We put the concept in early in the year for it?s red zone effectiveness, but we found that as the season went on we had more and more success with it in the field as well.  In the end, we saw far fewer fades because of this concept and we also found that our new alignment positioned us even better to react and attack the underneath concepts like the slants and out routes.

Catch Man Technique

The simplest understanding of catch man is that the DB works to stay put and the receiver would likely make his break in front of the defender between 7-10 yards. If receiver runs a vertical route, the DB will shuffle/slide feet, collision, turn & run. When the DB has more confidence, his pre-snap cushion can be shortened.   We teach our DB?s that by just aligning in the path of a receiver?s stem, they already re-routed the receiver.  Either the receiver runs over the defender, not running his route or he is forced to make his break early, declaring how the DB will play the route.   Here is a breakdown of the coaching points for this technique as it applies to different aspects of its execution:

Stance Coaching Points

  • Feet square in red zone
  • Inside Foot up in Open Field

CT Pic 7

Eye Coaching Points

  • Red-Zone, no reading 3-step, focus only on the WR
  • Open Field, option to read 3-Step

Progression Coaching Points

Read More

Game Planning RPO Packages from Quads Formations

By George Karafantis and Chris Taylor
Assistant Coach and Offensive Coordinator
Saint Anthony’s High School (NY)
Twitter: @greek42e @coachtaylorc4

 

 

The best offensive coordinators always seem to have the answers to any defensive scheme or adjustments that they see. If those same OC’s possess individually great athletes and players, they can create matchup nightmares that are virtually unstoppable. 

At St. Anthony’s HS we have been blessed with some great athletes and players in the past. The best and most versatile way, in our opinion, to create mismatches with these players is by using and operating out of a spread offensive system. Our pre-snap run pass combinations or post-snap run-pass options, from the spread, allow for multiplicity but simplicity (to borrow Gary Patterson’s defensive terminology) in play calling. It allows us to eliminate confusion up front by simplifying run schemes and simultaneously eliminating pass protection confusion. The spread allows for greater versatility in pass game concepts that traditional misdirection offenses do not. They offer the ability to stress defenses on the first, second, and third levels as well as from sideline to sideline all while utilizing one play call. You can attack through the air like Mike Leach’s Air Raid or on the ground in a power spread like Gus Malzahn’s power spread. Simple personnel changes and formation adjustments can help to further provide offensive advantages while limiting defensive looks.

One of the ways we simplify the looks that we get from the defense is by using TE Empty formations, especially when facing odd fronts. This article will focus on some of our answers to an odd defense which is through 11 and 12 personnel Quads formations.

 

Quads from 11 (or 12) Personnel

This season we found that you can dictate to the defense the one look you want to see or at least one of a couple of looks that you will see. You must be multiple in offensive formations and incorporate a TE. THERE IS A FINE LINE WITH BEING MULTIPLE in looks and keeping it simple. We will share one of our simple install methods to implement an 11 (or 12) personnel quads look to your spread.

What we discovered this past season was that if we lined up in a somewhat non-conventional formational grouping the defense would be forced to give one standard front/ coverage, most times. That simplified and made it easy to install, block and execute against. We gained this advantage by using the 11 and 12 personnel quads formations. This is especially useful against odd fronts. Because of increased popularity and our utilization of RPO’s into our offense, we very often see odd-front defenses. More on our RPO’s and RPC’s in the upcoming paragraphs. 

Diagrams 1 and 2 show our basic 11 and 12 personnel Quads formations.

Diagram 1

Diagram 2

 

We believed that by giving the defense a somewhat unconventional formation, while using a versatile TE (or 2), we would likely see a standard defensive alignment. Any defensive coordinator that has time to prepare for this package will be able to align to it, however, we hoped that they would spend an excessive amount of time on it while we ran our base run/pass and RPO concepts from it.

In diagram 2 the defense is forced to fit 8 gaps in the run game while still having to account for the 5 eligible receivers. (2 A Gaps, 2 B Gaps, 2 C gaps and the 2 outside D’s).  The more gaps, the more run fits which require more defenders to be sound in their assignment.

We have found there are countless benefits to spreading the defense out using an Empty backfield and 11 or 12 personnel Quads to a side. Quads, for the sake of this article, will be four receivers with a TE to one side of the formation. Some of the ways it’s effective are:

  • By adding gaps in run games that they have to fit
  • Helping a sub-par OL in pass protection
  • Allowing great running QB to see a lighter box
  • Having the single receiver matched up with one man
  • Simplifying looks you will see to Standard Empty Formations
  • Makes OLB’s in odd defenses have to play either on the TE or in space, whichever WE CHOOSE
  • Allows QB to remove an OLB from the box, opening up QB draw possibilities
  • 12 personnel increases offenses ability to run at weaker OLB/Safety type

 

Our run game consists mostly of 1 back, zone and gap scheme, read runs with RPO’s attached. We can, and do, run any run scheme out of Quads and several passing concepts out of it. The first thing we will discuss is the top formations we run using one or two TE’s from Empty as well as personnel adjustments or packages. Before we share some run-pass combinations (RPC) and run pass options (RPO) from our 11/12 Quads formation we must first define and /or review some terms.

Read More

Simple 2-Man Tags to Diversify Your Passing Game

By Eric Struck
WRs/Passing Game Coordinator/Special Teams Coordinator
Sioux Falls Washington High School (SD)
Twitter: @EricStruck

 

 

We went into the last off-season and wanted ways to be more multiple in the passing game without adding a bunch of new plays that our kids would have to learn. I think most coaches watch their game film or scout film and see things that are available that they would like to or wish they would have been able to run but maybe don’t have the flexibility within their scheme to do so.  We wanted something that would work with the Four Verticals Concept, which is what we hang our hat on in the passing game, as well as something that was simple for our kids to learn and something that was simple for us as coaches to teach to our kids. What we were able to develop was a system of 2 man tags that we could attach to our passing game that would give us multiple options from week to week based on what the defense was making available, provide some diversity into our offense and allow for more freedom to call plays based on in-game adjustments.

 

Installation

When we started this process, we were looking for concepts that would help us attack coverages that we see most often. The main coverage that we see is some form of Quarters or Cover 4.  With the way that we run our Four Verticals concept we have had success versus Cover 4 but there was always open areas or space that we weren’t able to take advantage of.

Diagram 1

 

With our system of 2 Man tags, we were able to take advantage of some of the open areas that the defense was giving us. We wanted most of these tags to be vertical in nature (as far as releases and stems) so that it would appear like Four Verticals to the defense. When we started implementing these tags during our summer workouts, we started everything from a 2×2 formation. We are a no-huddle offense, so when we signaled plays in, we decided it was best that the first concept signaled in pertained to the left side of the formation and the 2nd signal would apply to the right side of the formation. It didn’t take very long for our kids to pick up the system and we were quite happy with it coming out of the summer.

 

Double Post Tag

The first tag that we implemented was the Double Post tag, which we called “Depot”.

Diagram 2

 

Both receivers would run a seven-step route (we are inside foot forward team) and then plant off the outside foot and break at roughly a 45-degree angle. The outside receiver has more freedom on how sharp to break his route based on the open space available. On the opposite side, we could tag any of our main concepts that we wanted to be based on the game plan, matchups, space, etc. The main concept run to the other side would be our Four Verticals.

Diagram 3

 

When we run/call this play we really like it vs Cover 3 or Cover 4. We are looking to get the outside receiver open by using the inside post to take the near safety away from helping on the outside receiver. We are hoping to create open space for that outside receiver. The QB would start his read to the nearest safety and if that safety travels with the inside post then he can hit the outside receiver.

To study game film of this concept, click on the video below:

Read More

Matching Coverages to Formations in the 4-2-5

By Adam Hovorka
X&O Labs Managing Editor
Defensive Coordinator
Plainedge High School (NY)
Twitter: @XOLabs_Editor

 

 

With the evolution of modern offenses to include multiple formations, many personnel groupings, RPO’s, and various tempos, it has become increasingly difficult to call defense to match all those variables.  It has also become harder for defensive coaches to put their players in the best possible situation to always succeed.  One thing we have done to combat today’s modern offenses is to match coverages to the formations we see.  This has enabled us to not worry about being in the perfect call all the time but rather just know what coverage to be in based on what the offense is giving us.  One word tells our defense that we are playing zone match coverage and the players will call the coverage to the formation.  We do this to play sound against our opponents’ best run plays while being sounds against vertical routes.  We will pattern match all routes because we want to wind up in man situations and not spot dropping.

We are a 4-2-5 defense that will always play split-field coverage unless we are blitzing 5,6,7 and playing straight man or man free.  We will always employ a four-man front varying the alignment of the two defensive tackles depending on the Tight End, the location of back or field/boundary.  Our Defensive Ends will always be playing in a five-technique to an open end and slightly inside eye of the Tight End.  Our Inside Backers will always be in the box and move slightly to our game plan rules.  We will play our Free Safety and Strike (Strong Safety) to the field.  Our Whip (Weak Safety) will always align to the boundary and we do not flip our corners.  The FS is the boss of his side of the formation and the Whip is the boss of his side.  Both bosses are responsible for letting the defenders on their side know the coverage calls.  The FS makes a Roger/Louie call telling everyone which side he and the Strike will align.  To make it easy we do this by:

  • Field
  • Ball in MOF- TE or Multiple receivers
  • Ball in MOF and formation is even- to the back
  • Ball in MOF and formation is even, and back is in the pistol- defensive left

 

The first day of installation we teach defensive players, mainly the FS and Whip to recognize the formation to their side of the ball and to call out the number of backs (this is the job of the Bandit backer).  To one side of the formation it can only be the following:

Pro- TE/Wr 

Twins- two detached WR

Sky- Wide receiver by himself in two backs

Trips – Three detached receivers

Nub- One TE as only eligible to that side

FOUR and Empty (not covered here today)

 

2 READ (PALMS) Black

The first coverage we teach is what we call black (2 read) or (Palms).  We only run this to the side of the formation with a detached two receivers.  This can be run to the Roger/Louie call or away from it.  Diagram I shows the basic alignment and keys in this coverage.  The cornerback is at 5 yards with inside leverage and tilted inside toward the QB with his eyes on the #2 receiver.  The FS is at 8-10 yards inside of the #2 receiver with his eyes on that #2 receiver, buzzing his feet or slowly backpedaling depending on his ability and the speed of the WR.

Diagram 1

 

We teach both players to think I have the man I am aligned on “unless”.  The unless principle here means if #2 goes out in his first three steps.  If #2 were to go out in those first three steps, the corner has #1 and the FS would switch on #2.   We teach it a little different than most teams that run this type of coverage.  We have the corners real aggressive on the out breaking route and we are not waiting for our leverage to be threatened.  We feel we can do this because the FS is aligned on #2 and is looking at #2 for his read and not the QB or uncovered lineman.  If #2 bubbles or backpedals this triggers the corner to play the bubble and the FS to be over the top of the blocker in case if it’s a stalk and go or crack and go to the receiver who was blocking. 

The real benefit of playing this coverage is that to the Roger/Louie side we have an extra player.  We align that extra player, the Strike, between EMLOS and #2 cheating closer to the box on run downs.  He reads EMLOS for run/pass read and on pass reads he gets underneath #1 or plays the swing of the back.  The reason we like it so much is the fact he can really help in the run game from that alignment.  On any down block by the OT, he is coming right now.  If its zone read, our DE is bending and forcing the QB to pull the ball to that Strike. There are many times we force the QB to pull on zone read, and the Strike is right there on the QB.   If it’s a gap scheme play with DE getting kicked out the Strike will be there for the bounce when the defensive end plays the kick-out block correctly making the ball spill.   If the #2 WR decides to block down on the Strike, this triggers the FS to come up right away playing downhill vs the run. 

Read More

Freeze Backers with the Shovel/Bubble

By Dan Ellis

Head Coach

West Chester East High School (PA)

Editor’s Note:  Coach Dan Ellis is one of X&O Labs’ most popular monthly columnist.  His columns focus on offensive schemes that just flat out move the ball.  His previous post have been some of the most read and commented articles in X&O Labs’ history.  Ellis is the former record-setting quarterback at Virginia and currently serves as the Head Football Coach at West Chester East High School (PA).  And one of the best things about Coach Ellis is that he takes the time to answer any and all questions asked. So, if you have any questions after reading his column, just post it in the comments section below this report and Coach will respond shortly.

This season, we wanted to simplify our blocking rules for our offensive line and not get into too many plays and too many rules.  One of our basic plays that we will always run in Power and so we tried to think of other ways to use the scheme with different action, much the same way zone teams do with their schemes.  As a spread team, we try to be as innovative as possible in getting our skill guys on the field and into open space. 

As we began this process, several years ago we decided to add the power read.  Power read did a great job for us adding pressure on the defense.  This past off-season, we worked on running the same power scheme with the traditional shovel pass, but we also added a bubble to it on the edge to add an extra dynamic.  This gives us a simple scheme similar to other plays we run (both power and bubble) and adds pressure on the defense to play disciplined football similar to a traditional triple option team.

Here are our basic power rules:

PST – Combo to ILB

PSG – Combo to ILB

C – Backside A gap

BSG – Skip pull to PSLB

BST – Gap, hinge

Key Coaching Point:  Pulling guard will not block the play side defensive end and needs to pull tight to the play side combo, keeping his shoulders square to the line of scrimmage.

The Bubble will always come from the inside receiver to the same side as the shovel. We do this out of multiple formations, mostly doubles and trips looks. It also can be run out of pistol. 

Quarterback Read

Teaching the QB to read the play side defensive end is really the crucial point of the play.  Key coaching point for the QB – assume you are going to get the edge.  The QB cannot be surprised that the defensive end closes on the RB or squeezes the B gap.  If the QB comes out slow or is stalled by indecision, the integrity of the play and relationship between the RB, QB and Bubble player is ruined.

First, the QB must press the edge, putting pressure on the defense to not allow him to get the corner.  We teach the QB to get lateral quickly.  He is looking to get out on the edge unless the defensive end stops him, turning his hips or getting up field.  If he does either of those things, the QB will continue into the alley and force the LB/Alley player to make a decision.  If the LB attacks the QB, we will deliver the ball to the Bubble screen as quickly as possible. 

One of the key parts of the play for the QB is if he gets immediate pressure from the LB/Alley player.  In this situation, he will have to redirect directly to the Bubble.  We work consistently working quick feet to get hips and shoulders around to our target (Bubble).  We tell the QB to ‘two step’ – this means to take two quick steps right under their shoulders and get their shoulder and hip pointed to the Bubble immediately and then get the ball out now.  This is a technique we also use in our running game with the Bubble attached on the backside, so it is not a new technique that we need to teach.

Running Back

For the Tailback, we teach him to patiently run his track as he would on the regular Power play.  In our offense, we teach the aiming point for the Tailback to be the butt of the guard.  He will take a slower path and be very patient. We prefer to be slower rather than faster.  If we are too fast, the tailback will be in the ‘junk’ of the combo and pulling guard.  Patience will allow the tailback to avoid the ‘junk’ because the tailback is looking at the QB for the pitch.  Too fast and he will run into the guard.  Once he catches the shovel pitch, the tailback must get vertical now and not work too far laterally.  It is still a power play for him.  Patience!

Even Front vs Odd Front

The beauty of this play is that at its core, it is a simple power play that many teams run as a base running play.  There is no real teaching other than the QB read.  For us this play is a call it/run it.  We don’t need to worry about the front given or blitz shown.  We will run it either way. 

Key coaching point vs the odd front:  If the PST gets a 4I, we will vacate that player vs a true odd front or stack and work up to the LB.  Against the stack, see below.

Below you can see the different ways we run the play vs the different fronts:

Slide1

shovelbubbleSlide2Slide3

 

Adjustment agains Stack Teams:

With a stack team, we often get the games from the stack and so we always want to block the LB, not the DE.  If he is in a 4I, we rip outside the DE for the Stack LB.  Same if it is a 5, rip inside for the Stack LB. If the 5 slants and crosses the face of the PST, we never let someone cross our face.  In that case, the PST will block the slant and the BSG will pull around for the Stack LB.

Slide4Slide5

 

To see video of these concepts live this year, click on the link below:

Read More

“Buster” Split Safety Coverage

By Brandon Staley
Defensive Coordinator/Secondary Coach
John Carroll University (OH)
Twitter: @CoachStaley_JCU

TyranskyIntroduction:

Do you need a way to deny the ball on 3rd down in a “Gotta Have It” type situation?

Do you need a coverage that will deny in-breaking route concepts, which occur primarily on 3rd down when the ball is on a hash?

Do you need a coverage that can eliminate a great player on the backside of 3 x 1?

Do you need a coverage that has coverage answers to the outside in case an Offense runs their 3rd down concepts based on leverage?

Let me introduce you to a coverage at John Carroll that we call “Buster.”

Defining Buster Coverage:

“Buster” is a deny-the-inside 2-man concept that protects your defense against the weakness of 2-man coverage, which is number two to the flat. At JCU, we usually play “Buster” in our Dime Rabbits Personnel grouping, which includes six defensive backs, one linebacker and our four best pass rushers. We are a defense that is predicated on matching up, especially on 3rd down when we are playing some version of man-to-man.

“Buster” is a concept that we play to a 3 receiver side. In 3 x 1 it’s easy; you automatically have your 3 man side. (Diagram 1) In 2 x 2, the 3 man side becomes wherever the offset back is (Diagram 2). Away from the “Buster” side, we just play regular 2-man coverage, which we call “Macho.” This is a traditional trail technique that we will discuss in detail later. If it’s 2 x 2 and it’s Pistol or under center, than we just play “Macho” to both sides and the Middle LB (MAC) will have the RB man-to-man.

Slide1Slide2

Buster Corner Technique:

The essence of “Buster” is the corner technique. We play “Off” to the “Buster” side at 7-8 yards deep and 1-2 yards inside. We want to give the illusion that we are playing some form of zone (3 deep, quarters, 2 deep). The corner to the “Buster” side reads the #2 receiver and traps the flat if #2 comes out in the first 5 yards of the pattern. The slot defender then “cuts” to the #1 receiver and plays him man-to-man.

Slide3

If the #2 receiver goes under or pushes vertical, then the corner “sinks” with the #1 receiver and plays trail technique on him. For advanced players and coaches, you can have the corner “roll over” on the deep sail route at 15-18 yards after you have “sunk” with the #1 receiver. It’s the most difficult route concept for the slot defender because he has to cover a long ways, but if you have the corner “roll over,” you have a built in trap that the QB will never see.

Slide4

On the “Buster” side, the slot defender’s communication is critical. He is charged with assigning “Me” or “You” depending on the split of the #2 receiver. If the #2 receiver has a normal split, he communicates “Me” which tells the defender to his inside that he has #2. In a “Me” call, the defender inside the slot defender automatically has #3. It doesn’t matter if the formation is 2 x 2 or 3 x 1, all the slot defender is concerned with is the split of the #2 receiver to the “Buster” side.

If the #2 receiver has a tight split and he can’t play his inside leverage, he communicates “You,” which tells the defender inside that “You” have the deeper of #2 and #3 (Diagram #5). In a “You” call, the slot defender plays outside technique and delivers the #2 receiver to the inside defender. Remember, we are playing Dime Personnel, so that inside defender is usually a safety. In any 2 behind 3 scenario (Drive), the inside defender takes #2 and the slot defender pushes to undercut #3. A “You” call can also occur in 2 x 2 (Diagram 6).

Slide5Slide6

Trouble Shooting “Buster”:

Issues that ALWAYS need to cover on any down, but particularly 3rd down are 2-man stacks and 3-man bunches. The details of these difficult scenarios are critical to your success because if teams can’t win at the line of scrimmage vs. man-to-man, they will try and create access for their players to get open.

“Buster” vs. Stack:

Within the “Buster” concept, we play “Stack” to 2-man stacks, wh

Read More

Advancements on the Bubble Screen

By Lee Blankenship

Head Football Coach

Beggs High School, Beggs OK

pvVs XLIntroduction

Let me start by saying that I believe that every good football program has to have an identity. As a staff you must buy in, and sell out to it. Just as importantly, you have to sell your identity to your players. In my experience, this is more important than the actual scheme itself. When you can get your coaches and players to believe that what you are doing is the best in the country, when they believe that nobody’s playbook is better than yours, when they are convinced that what you are doing gives them the greatest opportunity to be successful, then you can expect to win a lot of football games. Whether your offensive identity is the 5 wide “air raid” or Wishbone “ground and pound,” the first defense that you must attack is that of your players’ confidence in your system. This cannot be emphasized enough. You must find a way to get your players to believe in you, and in what you are teaching. I firmly believe that one of the main reasons for our success here at Beggs is the fact that our players believe in what we do.

Here at Beggs, we believe in using the bubble as a staple in our offense. The bubble route is the building block of almost everything that we do. In practically every play that we run, the bubble route plays a part. We throw the bubble screen 8+ times per game, use the bubble to open up seams in our run game, and we use the route in several of the concepts in our pass game. The goal is for us to force our opponents to constantly be aware of the threat of the Bubble Screen, which dictates how many defenders are in the box.

Before getting into scheme, I want to discuss the fine mechanics of the bubble route and throw. As coaches, it is so easy to get caught up in scheme alone, neglecting to teach the fine points needed to execute the scheme successfully. I had a barn built this summer. It wouldn’t have made much since to give the builders the plans, without quickly providing the needed tools and materials to get the job done. Likewise, it doesn’t make a lot of coaching sense to provide the young athlete with a good scheme alone. We must give them the tools needed to effectively execute the scheme.  

Fine Mechanics of the Bubble:

When getting set in his stance, the slot should always start with his inside foot up, as in the picture below.

Slide1

When the ball is snapped, we teach our slot receivers to Lateral Run – cross inside foot (up foot) over outside foot. Player should keep his knee high on the crossover step. His shoulders should remain square to the line of scrimmage, arms pumping just as if he were running forward. Eyes should stay on the QB. We teach our players to run laterally, straight down the line. He is already lined up off of the line of scrimmage; therefore, we don’t want to give up any more ground than that. I disagree with teaching players to loop backwards when they run the bubble. Firstly, they are losing ground in an attempt to gain ground. It is easier to lateral run than it is to backpedal loop. Secondly, they are creating a much more difficult throw for the QB. Notice in the picture below that our slot receiver never gives up ground. He is actually catching the football just behind the line of scrimmage. Thirdly, they are not stretching the field as quickly, making it easier for the outside linebacker to rally to make the tackle. (We will talk about this in much more depth later on.) We perfect the lateral run throughout our off-season, and work it every day during the season.

slide2Slide3Slide4

Read More

6 Keys to Slowing Down the Wing T Offense

By Andrew Hofer
Head Football Coach
Polo Community High School (Polo, Illinois)
Twitter: @coachabh

 

Introduction:

Over the last ten years, the amount of spread offenses seen in game of football has surged. This has lead to a change in defensive strategy and philosophy from head coaches and defensive coordinators all over the nation. To combat these changes in defensive schematics, offenses seem to be going back to their roots: The wing-t formation.

This formation and the series’ that accompany them are mainstays amongst football programs nationwide. Even offensive gurus at the collegiate and professional levels tend to have at least some roots from the series’ associated with the wing-t.

Defending Wing-T Concepts:

At Polo High School, we generally have smaller players on our roster because of our small enrollment. Due that reason and our personnel, we are a 3 man front team that rotates the amount of guys we have in the box depending on the personnel and style of the teams we are facing. In the end, our base is a 3-5 with Cover 3 over the top or a 3-4 while playing quarters over the top.

To combat the wing-t, our program had to make some changes to better challenge all compliments of the series that come with these two formations. Typically, there are two main series’ that we see from these styles of teams: the Buck Sweep series and the Belly series.

Buck Series:

As a head coach, the Buck Sweep offensive series out of the wing-t is probably my favorite offensive series in all football. The problem with that notion is that many head coaches and offensive coordinators around the country agree. This is a series that can put some serious stress on a defense because, out of the wing-t, it can cause you fits in multiple areas.

Here are a few keys to slowing down the buck sweep:

Key 1: Attack the C gap to the TE Side – Typically, most wing-t teams have a strong blocking TE that can help pin the DE inside, in turn, allowing the pulling guards freedom of movement. This gives the HB a chance to make an L-cut up the alley and gash the defense. To attack the C-Gap, we want to slant our 3 man front toward the TE side of the wing-t. This counters that advantage and constricts the gap they are trying to create.

Read More

Incorporating the Surface To Air-Raid (S.T.A.R.) System to Enhance Air Raid Staples

By Rich Hargitt
Offensive Coordinator
Emmett High School (ID)
Twitter: @S2ASystem

 

 

At Emmett High School we are a base Spread Offense with Air Raid inspirations that features a large number of RPOs.  We run these plays from a fast tempo and feature, on average, about 10-15 formational adjustments per game.  The heavy reliance on RPOs has caused us to make the decision to re-implement more of our Air Raid roots into our passing offense this next season.  At the time of this writing, we are currently the #1 ranked passing offense in the state of Idaho by attempts, completions, yards passing per game, and overall passing yardage in a season.  These calls have and will allow us to create a false narrative for the defense by which they are not sure whether the play will be an RPO or a more down the field passing concept.  The name of our consulting group is the Surface To Air System but when we refer to our Air Raid twists in the drop back game we call it the S.T.A.R. Package (Surface To Air Raid).  There are four major Air Raid concepts that we have diversified and synthesized with our own unique twists and incorporated into our S2A System.  These concepts have been altered but still, contain heavy doses of Air Raid DNA.  The four major drop back concepts that we brought over are the 4 Verticals, Y-Cross, Shallow Cross, and the Mesh.

 

4 Verticals

The 4 Verticals or 4 Verts play has long been a staple of our system.  We feel that this play is the ultimate constraint play in order to keep defenses honest.  Most defenses are able to rotate coverages and bring exotic blitzes only to the extent that they are able to defend the back half of their coverage.  In short, they will do exotic things if they don’t get beat deep.  Therefore, the 4 verts play is pivotal in keeping defenses honest.  The play can be featured from a 2×2 or a 3×1 structure.  If 4 verticals are executed from a 2×2 set the outside receivers will execute Fade or Takeoff Routes, the slot receivers will execute Bender Routes, and the running back will execute a Shoot Route.

Diagram 1

 

The Fade Routes must turn the corner’s hips and prevent him from playing any sort of Read 2 type of coverage family.  The slot receivers will outside release off the ball and execute a 5 or 7 step release based upon the OLB’s alignment and defense.  If the coverage remains MOF closed, then the slots will both work vertically. If, however, the coverage is a MOF open family they will defeat the OLB and then bend to grass under the safety into what we call the Bermuda Triangle. 

The Bermuda Triangle is the area between the MLB, OLB, and safety.  We feel this is a dead zone where we can work and get ourselves open pass completions.  The running back will execute his Shoot Route to the flat or can be incorporated into the protection scheme.  Our read progression is quite simple as we read Deep to Shallow to Mid.  This translates as the Fade Route, to the Shoot Route, to the Bender Route.  We read it this way so that any trap coverage corner is beaten by the Fade Route and we hole shot behind him to prevent that coverage answer.  We check the short route next to prevent any sort of blitz charge by the second level defenders.  The Bender Route is read last as it takes the most time to work to grass. 

This route is essentially unaltered when we execute it from 3×1.

Diagram 2

 

In 3×1 the #3 receiver simply bends and attacks the hash he would have run up in 2×2 and applies all the same rules.  If the MOF is open he would bend under the safety but if the MOF is closed, he would work up the hash.  The read progression would remain unchanged and the play caller is free to flip the running back Shoot Route to the weak or strong side based upon his protection preferences. 

The 4 Verts play has long been a staple of our offense and is a great Air Raid play that defeats multiple coverage families.  This play is easily tagged and can and is altered in the S2A System to attack a variety of defensive presentations.

Read More

St. Francis University’s (IN) Tweak on Tampa Two

 

 

 

By Joey Didier – @coachjoeydidier

Co-Defensive Coordinator

University of Saint Francis (IN)

 

1385774 536839373067773 1925714199 nEditor’s Note:  Joey Didier returns to USF for his fourth season as an assistant coach after playing for the Cougars through the 2004 season. Didier, the Cougars’ 2004 Silver Helmet Award winner, served as an assistant at Homestead High School from 2005-09, where he was a 2001 graduate. He was a 4-time letter-winner playing inside linebacker for the Cougars, played in two final fours and was the USF Champion of Character selection in 2004. He received a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration in 2005 and a Master of Business Administration in 2013. Didier is also a member of the football strength and conditioning staff and is a Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist by the National Strength and Conditioning Association.

 

At the University of Saint Francis, we pride ourselves in game plan preparation.  Moving to a new system in 2013 we knew we could prepare adequately for our opponent each week, but in game adjustments may be more of a challenge.  To ease the transition of a new scheme, we practiced installing adjustments as a staff during game week.  After the initial game plan was installed, our defensive staff spent the remainder of the week analyzing possible weakness in our plan.  We would identify areas of concern and counter with possible adjustments for Saturday.

With this approach, we found success implementing a Plan A and Plan B each week.  Plan A would stem from our base defense, with Plan B as some innovative variation to counter an identified weakness. We would prep our Plan A during game week and then brief our defensive players about the possible Plan B if needed.   We would not extensively practice our plan B, but would devote one practice period late in the week to walk through such potential adjustments.

This approach allowed our defensive staff to make quick in-game and halftime adjustments.  Our staff made successful adjustments this season, holding our opponents to 8.1 points per second half.  Our 3-high alignment was one of these adjustments.  The package was installed to improve defending a vertical passing attack, while denying the sideline to shorten the game.  This defense was initially a Plan B for a spread opponent but grew into a package we carried each week. The installation was simple and similar to our base defense, yet unique enough to provide difficulty for our opponent to stretch the field.

Overview

We base with 34 personnel but will substitute a nickel back for a linebacker to give different looks.  We not only use this position to enhance game plan creativity, but to also develop a young defensive back with invaluable game experience.  This player is normally the first defensive back off the bench and should be one of the more versatile athletes on the field. In 2013, our nickel was a traditional strong safety. 

Read More

Applying the “ACTS” Principle to the Seam/Wheel Concept

By Lonnie Norton
Offensive Coordinator/QBs
Prairiland High School (TX)
Twitter: @coachlnorton

 

   

As the offensive coordinator at Paris High School, myself, along with head coach Steven Hohenberger, sat down in order to find a way to improve a passing game that had produced only 9 TDs to go with 13 INTs during the 2013 season. With input from one of my former football coaches and now coaching mentor, Dan Gonzalez, we turned our passing game around to one that produced 27 passing TDs and only 6 INTs in the 2014 season and led to the program’s deepest playoff run in 26 years and followed it up the following season with 25 TDs and only 6 INTs. The concept that proved to be one of our most explosive and certainly, one of our most versatile was the Seam and Wheel concept. With this, we had a concept that could defeat the blitz and man coverage, defeat overloaded coverage to trips, an outstanding red zone play, as well as a play that was guaranteed to get the ball to one of our best playmakers.

 

The Pattern and Coaching Points:

Diagram 1

 

Single WR Side

  • #1:  Seam or Post
  • >Back:  Wheel

 

Seam – Aiming point is 7 yards deep at 2 yards off the hash (NCAA Hash Marks in Texas) before pushing vertical. He will throttle in the hole till he hits 15 yards deep and will then clear out.

Diagram 2

 

Wheel – We teach the back to push through the heels of the Seam/Post runner’s alignment before going vertical up the bottom of the numbers.  The back MUST be alert for any edge pressure as he will be hot for the QB.  He should expect the ball at no deeper than 12 yards down field.

Diagram 3

 

3 WR Side

  • Tagged Inside WR:  Shallow
  • Non-Tagged Inside WR:  Dig
  • Outside WR:  Under

 

Shallow – This has been a staple of our offense.  The shallow wants to release flat at a depth of 2-3 yards and slowly gain ground.  As he works his way across the field, he will read the flat defender on the opposite side.  If the shallow runner can get outside the flat defender, he will stay on the run.

Diagram 4

 

If the hole player widens, he will work to a stop around the opposite hash and show hands and numbers to the QB.

Diagram 5

 

Against Man Coverage, he will need to stair step his route in order to create separation.

Diagram 6

 

This route is worked daily by all WRs as part of a daily warm up for both WRs and QBs.  

Read More

4-2-5 Split Coverage Variations to Defend Trips

By Chris Endress
Defensive Coordinator
Columbus High School (KS)

Introduction:

columbusAt Columbus High School, we are a 4-2-5 base defense that uses split coverage rules. A couple seasons ago, we divorced our front 6 from our secondary which made things much easier to adjust to what we see week after week.  Our defense is based on rules for different receiver combinations we see at during points throughout the season: 1 WR; 2 WR; Trips; Quads. For this clinic report, I will discuss our two top coverage rules for trips looks.

Base Coverage (Solo)

We base out of a quarters look (called “Blue”). Our free safety (F) and gorilla/strong safety (G) always travel together and move to the receiver strength which will be the trips side. The Willie (W) always aligns away from the F. For trips, our corner aligns 1×7 outside of the #1 receiver tilted inside. The F apexes the #2 receiver and the football. The G aligns 1×5 outside of the #2 receiver.  The W aligns in B gap away from the trips at 10 yd deep. The linebackers bump to the trips. The play side backer apexes the #3 receiver and the football. The back side backer aligns on the weak side shoulder of the RB in the backfield.

Slide1

Each defender has a pre–snap key. They are as follows:

  • The corner (C) reads #1 and has him on all vertical routes.
  • The G reads the end man on the line of scrimmage (EMOLOS).  He works outside and deep at the snap under #1 but locks on to the first threat that crosses his face.
  • The linebackers key their near guard then works to hook/curl and breaks on the first threat to enter the tackle box.
  • The F reads #2 and has him on any vertical route.
  • The W reads #3 and has him on any vertical route. The F and the W become de facto “cover 1” safeties if their reads do not go vertical.

Slide2

Solo works the same for other trips looks besides Trips Open (see diagrams 3 and 4). The pre-snap keys and the responsibilities remain the same.

Slide3

Slide4a

For Bunch looks, we play more of a box look. In that case, the C has the first outside deep threat, the G has the first short outside threat, the LB has the first inside threat, the F has the first deep inside threat, and W plays “Cover 1” to give help on any 3 vertical looks.

Read More

Defending Heavy Personnel Concepts From 3-4 Spacing – Case 1: Defending Concepts from Balanced 1 and 2 Back Formations

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

  

Editor’s Note: This research will be centered on defending the following personnel groupings:

  • 12 Personnel (one back, two tight ends)
  • 13 Personnel (one back, three tight ends)
  • 22 Personnel (two backs, two tight ends)
  • 23 Personnel (two back, three tight ends)

 

Produce a three-man surface when preparing against Odd defenses: that’s been a practice for offensive coaches for years. Add a bigger body such as a tight end at the end of the line of scrimmage and force a smaller body (such as an outside linebacker in an Odd outfit) to hold water against him. It seemed to be a more ambitious plan than preparing against a pure 7 or 6-technique defensive ends synonymous in Even front teams.

As offenses have evolved into using heavier personnel groupings, they have forced Odd defenses to adjust in defending them. But, rather than change the structure of the defense, Odd coaches are choosing to alter their support structure to get more numbers at the point of attack. As evidenced in this report, many of these coaches have chosen to tie safeties into the fit by using a two-high quarters coverage structure in defending it.

In this study, we research how 3-4 coaches are choosing to play with two-high safety spacing against heavier personnel, such as 12, 13 and 22 groupings. We segment our research into the following formation structures:

  • “Ace”- pure one back formation structures from both detached and attached tight end alignments.
  • “Deuce”- pure two back formation structures from both detached and attached tight end alignments.

 

There are generic labels that we selected to help in identifying and separating these formation bases. But there is a distinction that must be made in game planning against these formation types.

 

One Back vs. Two Back Distinctions

We found that many Odd coaches will alter their adjustments based on this one-back vs. two-back approach. While they may still decide to stay in two-high coverage structure, they may decide to change the personality of these defenders based on the backfield number. Illinois State defensive coordinator Travis Niekamp is one of those coaches who claim this to be a big debate in the defensive football offices each week. “We talk about are they a two-back team or a one-back team based on who that sniffer is, “said Coach Niekamp. “We use one-back vs. two-back rules. It’s really one or the other based on each opponent. We try to figure out if that sniffer is a glorified fullback or is he a legitimate tight end? Most offenses will either be a gap scheme team and insert team with two-back or they are a one-back zone team mindset. Is he a viable downfield pass threat or not? Is he a blocker? Do they move him around where they want out of the point of attack? We make our decisions based on that.”

 

Applying Quarters Coverage Methodology

At its core, quarters coverage is a man coverage philosophy. Coordinators have the ability to put nine defenders in the box to defend the run yet still be able to have the ability to handle four vertical threats. For Jason Bornn, the head coach at Saugus High School (CA), quarters coverage has been the base call in his 3-4 defense the last 16 years and 62 percent of the time he will drop 8 to play against heavier personnel groupings. “It just works for us because we use one safety as force and one safety as backside cutback,” said Coach Bornn. “It cleans the fit up better. We need nine defenders in the box to defend the run game. I never understood when coaches say, ‘Cover 3 puts eight defenders in the box.’ Not really. You’re wasting the high safety. It’s seven in the box. You get nine with quarters.”

For Coach Niekamp, who spent the lion’s share of his professional career as a four-down coach, felt at one point the best solution to defending heavy personnel is to line up in pure Under front and play buzz safety, or Cover 0. “But, the problem with man is you need to fit it right,” said Coach Niekamp. “And if you don’t fit it right, you’re going to be a man short. And that missed fit is that play winds up being a big play or a touchdown. The nice thing with the split safety look is you can be wrong but still be okay as far as the fit goes because you’re always going to gain that extra safety back. We found out that after being an even front coach for nearly 20 years, we can line up more quickly and execute better out of Odd with the shifts and motions with formations. It was a no-brainer. Why not be an Odd team?”

So, in order to match up with heavier personnel groupings in the Missouri Valley Conference, where more than half of his opponents lined up with two or more tight ends, Coach Niekamp decided to operate from a field and boundary defense. “I liked that for two reasons: tempo and matching personnel,” he said. “You can personnel to match an offense. You would like to be mirrored but this is not the NFL. You still need to find a faster guy to put to the field and a slower player to put toward the boundary.” 

So, in order to defend these sets Coach Niekamp will not adjust his structure; rather he will adjust his support calls based off rules. “We are a quarters defense and have the ability to vary our support structure accordingly,” he told us. “We can cloud a corner or sky a safety. Those are our generic rules. We want to make sure we can line up and play fast. The key is the interior defenders and the front three because the beauty of the 3-4 is that if you can have Nose that can guarantee double teams you are freeing up a linebacker. You can eat up five offensive linemen with three guys and it makes things easier. That’s why we saw gap schemes. They couldn’t block them, so they had to read them.” 

Read More