Defending RPOs from Four Down, Two High Spacing: Case 1 – Box Defender Reads & Fits vs Option Runs

By Mike Kuchar 
Senior Research Manager 
X&O Labs 
Twitter: @MikekKuchar 

 

Special Reporting by Adam Hovorka, X&O Labs Contributing Writer 

 

Introduction 

Playing a four down front, two-high defense can place a good amount of stress on the box defenders. In most 4-2-5 structures, these box defenders consist of the front four linemen plus the strong side and weak side inside linebackers. In 4-3 looks, the presence of the Sam/Nickel or strong safety is added into the equation. How a coaches trains those defenders can have a major impact on defending the first level option principles most associated with RPO offenses. After all, RPOs are option offenses at the core, and taking away the first two threats (dive and pull) usually equates in defensive success. Like defending flexbone schemes, the more the ball gets pitched the better off a defense is, the quickest way to gash a unit is north to south. And the while the onus of that responsibility falls on the box defenders, it’s the defensive line that has to be able to cancel gaps along the front.  

This case is devoted to how coaches are training their front four to react and defend the more common run sequences associated with RPO football (zone, single pull and double pull concepts). But before we uncover our research on how these coaches are defending them, we thought it necessary to briefly summarize the type of personnel each of our contributors are using in their base defensive outfits.  

Editor’s Note: Our contributors to this report all base out of a four down front, some are 4-3 in structure, while others are 4-2-5.  

Personnel  

Chris Endress, Co-Defensive Coordinator, Seneca High School (MO): “We play with a field defenisve end and a boundary defensive end. Our defensive tackles adjust to and from the call.  We always call our fronts to where the Eagle (3-technique) will go such as Eagle left or right. Tite or open is based off the tight end placement and field and boundary. We will also use back and bop, which is to or away from the running back. Our linebackers are the same. The Eagle linebacker goes with the 3-technique and the Hawk LB goes with the Shade. In our 2×2 looks, the Hawk LB is the one who leaves the box, but he is always to the boundary. He will have less ground to cover. Overhangs are similar. The Gorilla (SS) always goes to the field. The Willie (WS) always aligned to the boundary. So they can align pre-snap. It also allows me to cross-teach the reads, fundamentals, alignments, etc.” 

Rob Everett, (@nineinthebox) Defensive Coordinator, Bridgewater College (VA): “We play with a true quick defensive end and a guy who is more suited to go against the tight end.  Our 3-technique is the more athletic of the two tackles. We rotate many defensive linemen. Our Field Strong Safety we call our Whip. Our Rover is the weakside safety and he always travels with the backer, the weak-side inside backer. When we play against 2-2, we basically become 4-3 so that backer is a hybrid player. “ 

Adam Hovorka, Head Football Coach, Schneiber High School (NY): “We always play quick athletic types at defensive end as we want kids that can get off the ball and bend and chase. We will play with one bigger tackle as our 3-technique and one quicker kid at the Nose. We will play one true middle linebacker (Mike) and he is an old school plugger. Our other box linebacker is the Bandit and he is a hybrid inside backer and 4-3 OLB. He has to be able to run and be a great blitzer. We already play with quicker defensive end types to begin with. We want long quick kids that can pass rush and bend and chase. We play a field defense with a strong safety (Strike) that will go the field 90% of the time. He aligns with the FS and they are in split field coverage to the read side.   

“On the opposite side we play a weak safety (Whip) that will determine the coverage to his side. Verse tight formations, the Mike aligns to the strength and the Bandit opposite. In open formations, the Mike goes to the read side and the Bandit will go to the away side with the Whip. At times, we will sub out our Strike and put a pure pass cover player there also. If we do this we are probably moving our Strike either to Mike or defensive end. In obvious pass situations, we will play with the four best pass rushers and as much speed on the field as possible. If we are doing this we are either blitzing or we are expecting an obvious pass situation. We will have our Strike get some reps at walling of #2 or #3 in trips just like our Mike would.”  

Chris Kappelmeier, Defensive Coordinator, Sparta High School (NJ) 

“We play a field defense versus open formations. We will read the wide side of the field. The Strong Safety and Free Safety align to the wide side of the field regardless of the formation. The Free Safety makes a reading right or a reading left call to call the passing strength of the formation. He then makes a coverage call for his side of the formation which will be the corner, strong safety, and one of the linebackers. The Weak Safety now makes a coverage call for his side, which is the away side, for himself, the corner and the other linebacker. Our defensive ends are generally linebacker type players to start with so we do not sub them out. We will play our regular strong safety who is a linebacker/defensive back hybrid.” 

Read More

Defending RPOs from Four Down, Two High Spacing: Case 2 – Designating Run First vs. First Overhangs Based Off Formation

By Mike Kuchar 
Senior Research Manager 
X&O Labs 
Twitter: @MikekKuchar 

 

Special Reporting by Adam Hovorka, X&O Labs Contributing Writer 

Introduction 

In defending the RPO game, a decision has to be made by defensive coordinators on whether or not they stay in two-high or one-high safety structures. While the protocols of this decision can be influenced by several variables—running ability of the quarterback, a potential mismatch on the perimeter—essentially it will boil down to what facet of the option game a defensive coordinator wants to commit to defending. While we will analyze this decision making process further, we’ve found that the philosophy behind making this decision relies on the following: 

  • If the quarterback is a running threat, it’s essential to equal numbers in the run game so that there is a player responsible for tackling the quarterback. 
  • If the running back is the most proficient element in the RPO game, gap exchanges need to be made to make sure the ball is being pulled by the quarterback in the run game.  
  • If a particular receiver is the most proficient element in the RPO game, coverages need to be dictated to defend him. 

Many coaches still believe that playing a single high man structure, such as cover one, provides for an adequate answer in the RPO game because a defense has equal numbers to defend each potential receiver along with a single high safety that can be tied into either playing the quarterback in the run game or giving help to any potential receiver in the pass game.  

But the coaches we researched with in defending the RPO element believed that equal numbers is a detriment, particularly if your defenders are not as talented as those on the other side of the ball. Then what? It becomes necessary to find a way to get a plus one or a plus one and a half numbers advantage to whatever element of that option game a defensive coordinator is choosing to defend. That is being done by playing two-high safety structures where help is given to both the run and pass equally.  

So, now the dynamic has shifted to defending the RPO game with two-high safety structures and the thought process is to keep those two safeties high so they can trigger quicker on the run or pass game by studying a pre-snap (or post-snap) visual cue rather than being tied to the reaction of a particular receiver as they would be in man coverage. It allows them to be an extra player in the run game or an extra defender in the pass game based on the formation presented by the offense. While we will detail the pre-snap cues that trigger these reads by the safeties in a later case, the roles of the overhang defenders (or invert players) become even more prominent. These are the dual read defenders, the ones that the quarterback is reading to make his choice to run or throw the football.  

It is a defensive coordinator’s job now to protect those overhangs. In this case, we are going to study the means in which these defensive coaches are protecting those overhangs, either by defensive structure, pressure or by adjusting to the offensive formation.  

Editor’s Note: For teaching purposes, the techniques and fundamentals of the overhang defender will be presented in 2×2 open formation. We will detail how coaches are adjusting to other formations later in this report.  

Identifying the Overhang Defender Based on Coverage 

In order to keep two-high safety structures, there will be an overhang defender responsible for playing either run or pass and it is this same overhang defender that the quarterback will look to manipulate based on his movement. This is the defender that is tied to both a gap in the run game and a responsibility in the pass game. Consider the following formations and the overhang defenders that can be influenced. While there are a multitude of formations that can be presented by the offense, we wanted to present the most common ones associated with RPOs, according to our research and the stress they place on a defense.  

10 Personnel Doubles Formations (Diagram 15) 

Slide15

The challenge in defending 10 personnel doubles formations is that the width of the receivers can solicit a five-man box to defend six potential gaps in the run game. This is nothing new; defending this formation has become an ageless paradox that has plagued defensive coordinators since the early 2000’s when then West Virginia head coach Rich Rodriquez was dicing opponents with the zone option with running back Steve Slaton and quarterback Pat White. 

Read More

Defending RPOs from Four Down, Two High Spacing: Case 3 – Full Field and Split Field Coverage Concepts that Protect Overhangs

By Mike Kuchar 
Senior Research Manager 
X&O Labs 
Twitter: @MikekKuchar 

 

Special Reporting by Adam Hovorka, X&O Labs Contributing Writer 

 

Introduction 

RPOs are formation-based concepts particularly when they are designed to attack four down, two-high safety structures. Defensive coordinators that use these structures ask a lot of their safeties to be able to fit in the run game and help on the pass game. So, when offensive coordinators design their RPO concepts, they are looking to manipulate what defender is responsible to play both run and pass. They find which defender is stressed by formation and they work to manipulate that defender with a run read. While we already detailed who those defenders can be in the previous case, in this case we are going to share our research on the coverages that defensive coordinators are using to protect these possible manipulated defenders.  

TwoBack Formation Fits: 

Not surprisingly, most of RPO formations explained in this report are one-back formations by nature. 2×2 and 3×1 structures are the more popular formations offensive coaches are implementing in their RPO game. However, there is a contingent of coaches that have chosen to use two-back personnel groupings, such as 20 personnel and 11 personnel H/Y off structures, to design their RPOs. While some of these diagrams are displayed in this report, most defensive coaches use the following protocols in defending RPOs from these two-back formations: 

  • Two-Back offenses doesn’t always require a safety to be tied into the fit; it’s possible to defend 20 personnel groupings with the seven box defenders.  
  • For H/Y off 11 personnel outfits, the inside backers will be tied to the post-snap direction of the H/Y off. He creates an additional gap that needs to account for. 

In either case, the pre-snap alignment of the Y/H and the direction of the mesh will be the primary indicator in which defenders will be run first or pass first defenders. The diagrams below detail the day one run fits four down, two-high safety defenses will utilize against the H/Y split zone schemes that are popular today. 

diagram30bdiagram30b

Two-High Coverage Methodologies in Defending RPO 

Quarters (Cover 9) Coverage 

Why It’s Effective Against RPO 

Playing pure cover nine allows for a two-high look to defend the possibility of downfield vertical threats while also providing for a solid run surface against 10 personnel teams. Against RPO teams, cover nine allows for a possibility of 8.5 defenders to the run game and 2.5 defenders to the pass, depending on the formation. It’s best served in clouding the read of the QB to make a decision because of the uncertainty of the two overhang defenders. Coaches will utilize quarters coverage structures either by setting the 3-technique to the field, to the back or as base call against Pistol formations. It’s also effective because it can essentially become cover zero with underneath help, which provides assistance on the interior RPO game such as slants replace routes.  

Quarters Coverage Fits with 3-Technique set to Field: 

  • 3-Technique set to field  
  • Mike: B gap defender 
  • Overhang to field – Run to, A gap defender; Run away – hold and fold player 
  • Overhang to boundary – Run to, B gap player; Run away – hold and fold player 

diagram30d

Read More

Trap Coverage to Defend 3×1 RPO Concepts

By Klint King
Defensive Coordinator
Richland High School (TX)
Twitter: @klintking

Introduction

Our “trap” trips coverage is just one call we use to help defend an offenses RPO concept. This call allows our conflict defender to be in a better position to defend the run and pass. Shortening the space and number of receivers our outside linebacker is responsible for allows him to be a better run support defender. Trap is best when expecting a bubble/stick or stop route concept. However the rules we have in place make it is still safe to run if the offense runs a 4 vertical concept. We are a split field coverage team against any two by two set, but normally we flip to a full field coverage against any 3×1 sets. Our base alignment as a 4-2/4-3 defense to a 3×1 set is shown below (Diagram 1).

Slide1

Our base alignment is an over front to the trips. The alignment of our run/pass conflict player ($) is 4 yards on the outside shoulder of the number 3 receiver. This alignment is to try and put doubt in the quarterback’s mind. We want the QB to be unsure of whether the number three receiver will be open or not. We base out of a cover two concept to the three receivers. This means the $ could be responsible for any of the three receivers in pass responsibilities. Our trap alignment is show below (diagram 2).

Slide1

As you see in the diagram above, we will work out of our base alignment immediately before the snap to shorten the formation.

Alignment Rules

Slide3

Above you see where the base alignments should be as the ball is snapped. We want the corner and free safety to hold their movements as long as possible. The longer we can disguise the movement of our secondary, the better off we will be.

Strong Safety: The $ moves his alignment from outside the number 3 receiver to the inside shoulder.

Corner­: The corner moves, according to the snap count, to trap the outside hip of the #2 receiver.

Free Safety: The free safety moves his alignment from 10×2 inside the #2 receiver, to 8×1 inside the #1 receiver.

Weak Safety: The weak safety base alignment is 10×2 outside the end man on the line of scrimmage.

Strong Safety ($) Coaching Points:

The strong safety is a run/pass defender. He is responsible for the quarterback on zone read, and will work 3 to 2 on pass. Moving the strong safeties alignment to the inside shoulder allows him an unimpeded path to the quarterback on zone read. It also allows him the ability to sit underneath the stick route of the #3 receiver in an RPO concept.

His first pre-snap key is offensive tendencies based on running back location. Before the development of the RPO for offenses, the key for reading run/pass was usually end man on the line of scrimmage (E.M.O.L.). Now our strong safeties run/pass key is the backfield action. The option you want to eliminate most will ultimately decide how quickly he triggers on run. Allowing him to sit on the stick route is crucial to eliminating big plays.

Slide3

Read More

One Word RPO Verbiage for Tempo Offenses

By Matt Rosati
Head Football Coach 
Perry High School (OH)

 

Introduction

In the game of football, every revolutionary concept that has success leads to extremely creative coaches researching and scheming ways to beat it. In the past five years, RPOs have impacted the game at all levels. As so many great defensive minds have found ways to disrupt many RPO concepts, the RPO world is evolving and taking another step forward. 

Like many RPO centric offenses, our program at Perry High School has been able to take our best run plays and package them with our most efficient pass concepts. In 2015, we established ten RPO concepts into our offense and our scoring average went from 29 points per game (PPG) in 2014 to 40 PPG in 2015. We continued to implement more RPO concepts and our average increased to 41 PPG in 2016 and 48 PPG in 2017 through the use of 32 one-word RPO concepts in a no-huddle format. To take this to the next level, we have taken some of our base RPO concepts and have implemented a variety of trick plays into the system.  

The Problem

Ninety percent of our offensive schemes incorporate RPOs. We only have two passing concepts that do not have a run option (vertical route and mesh route concepts). We have found that one of the best ways that teams are defending our normal RPOs is not necessarily related to great defensive schemes but more so by using the rules of the game against us. Many teams discuss the rules with the officials prior to the game to induce more illegal man downfield infractions. On most Friday nights, I witness opposing coaches bend the ear of the officials about our linemen being downfield on every pass play. 

While the opposing coaches were often right, the flag was very seldom dropped. That said, I am seeing that trend change. We have utilized an RPO system for three seasons and our number of penalties for illegal man downfield have jumped from three (out of 606 plays) in 2015, seven (out of 781 plays) in 2016, and thirteen (out of 716 plays) in 2017. In three years, twenty-three illegal man downfield calls have been issued out of a total of 2105 plays. Painfully, of the twenty-three penalties, eight resulted in a touchdown being called back. 

Let me be clear. There is no argument. We were guilty all twenty-three times. The fact of the matter is that even though we were hardly penalized for it, the officials were looking to make the call now more than ever before. With that in mind, we had to make a decision.  Our options are:

  1. Hope the officials don’t call it
  2. Stop running RPOs
  3. Do a better job of coaching and adjust to what was stopping us at an annoyingly high rate?

We choose to go with the third option and examined how our guys were getting too far down field and made some necessary adjustments. The self-analysis led us to a new concept in the RPO scheme that will keep us a step ahead of the defensive adjustments.

One Word Offense

Prior to going to our RPO philosophy, our players were versed in the traditional odd and even number schemes, with odds going left and even going right. Most of these systems implement a back numbering system (1 QB, 2 FB, 3 TB, 4 SB) so a play call like “24” would be the full back running the ball through the four hole (B-gap on the right). When we went to the one word RPO system, we kept the odd and even direction concept utilizing the second number but the major change we made was that the first number now dictated which defender we were going to read. This gave a greater flexibility to the play type and formation. Here is how it worked:

First number

1 = Reading backside DE

2= Reading backside Inside LB

3 = Reading frontside DE

4= Reading frontside Outside LB

5 = Must run (no pass option)

Second number

0/1 = Full Inside Zone

2/3 = Guard wrap

4/5 = Power

6/7 = Counter

8/9 = Full Outside Zone

For example, the play could be called is “10.”  The first number denotes that we are reading a defensive lineman and the second number gives the direction of the play as well as the run scheme.  In this case, it means the offensive line will zone block to the right leaving the EMOLOS as the read key to the left. We then essentially create a story surrounding the call. For a 10 call, I simply asked the players the name of the prettiest girl they knew because she is a “10.” After the players would argue, they would agree on a name: Wanda. Wanda now became the RPO one-word call. The naming becomes a mnemonic device to help the players remember the call.

Read More

21-Hour Football Program: Creating an Off-Season Character Development Program

Jeff Tomlin
Head Football Coach
Grand Island High School (NE)

 

 

Introduction

More and more, coaches are realizing that having a character development component present within their football program is important to developing players both on and off the field. The game of football is a tremendous platform for teaching the “game of life.” In my 30 years of coaching, I have always understood the importance for developing character, but I wasn’t always the best at implementation. The challenge was always when I would be able to squeeze in character development around the other demands of preparing a team and running a program. For that reason, character development for us was a “grab bag” approach with a quote here and a story there. 

Although I worked hard to teach the core values of honor, courage, commitment and loyalty, I wasn’t as impactful as I could have been because I lacked a systematic approach to making character development an established part of our program. As Coach Urban Meyer is quoted as saying, “average leaders have a quote, good leaders have a plan and great leaders have a system.” I wholeheartedly agree.  

The goal of this article is to outline the process we use in establishing and implementing our character development system and share with you how this has impacted our program. I am sure many of you have similar and perhaps superior systems in place, but it is my hope that I can share at least one idea with you worth including in your program. 

Element 1:  Establish Your Culture

The first step toward implementing character development into your program begins with establishing the culture of your program. Culture is nothing more than a program’s core beliefs, values, traditions, identity and ways of behaving. I am not here to tell anyone what type of culture to establish but instead to encourage coaches to figure out the “purpose” of your program and what you believe in. In short, your culture is “who you are” and “what you do”.  Without an established culture, it will be difficult to communicate and teach character. In many ways, culture and character are one and the same. 

We base our culture on a Code of Excellence. We believe in the relentless pursuit of excellence in the areas of attitude, effort, discipline, fundamentals and team unity. We believe that we have complete control over these five pillars and feel like, if we are excellent in these five areas, winning will take care of itself. We have also built our program upon the four core values of honor, courage, commitment and loyalty. We pride ourselves on being “blue collar” and in being a close-knit brotherhood. 

Element 2: Establish Clear Expectations

It is hard to have an effective character development program if you don’t clearly communicate policies and expectations. This is an obvious point, but an important one nonetheless. Everyone, including players, parents, football staff, boosters, administrators and support staff must have a clear idea of the vision, mission, policies and expectations of the program. 

Read More

Three-Level Sail Concept: New Trends Create a High-Low Stretch on the Flat Defender

By Lee K. I. Boyd
Wide Receivers Coach
Saint Louis High School (HI)

Introduction:

Our sail concept presents a three-level flood of the outside third of the defense, placing receivers deep, middle, and short, applying maximum pressure on the third level defenders and creating a clear high-low stretch on the flat defender.  This is our constraint play designed to counteract coverages that cheat in order to fit the routes of the “Go” concept (link to previous article).   

Slide1Slide1Slide1Slide1

Back Side #1 Receiver “In Route”

The back side receiver will align at the bottom of the numbers and execute an in route. We want to speed cut out of the break at 14 to 16 yards, working downhill to the quarterback, or at worst parallel to the line of scrimmage. If we get man coverage we accelerate across to get separation. If we see zone drops in front of us, we come across under control looking to find a window between defenders. This route becomes a home run if the defense takes away the design of the flood concept by aggressively fitting our strong side route combination.

Front Side #1 Receiver “Go Route/Post Option”

The front side outside receiver will align 3 yards from the top of the numbers if the ball is on the opposite hash mark. He will take a quickest release and run a go route with the option to post. His primary responsibility is to create a vertical stretch on the defense and protect the sail route from the most dangerous secondary defender.

I have the receiver start their pre-snap thought process by identifying the middle of the field as open or closed.  Disciplining the receivers thought process helps to control their heart rate, and increases execution of route options, which for the flood concept is the possibility of posting.

VS Middle of the Field Closed (MOFC) Zone Coverage (Cover 3) – The receivers’ job is to close the cushion on the corner quickly, staying tight to his outside shoulder. If the defender doesn’t fully transition as the receiver becomes a vertical threat, or if he hangs his eyes in the backfield disregarding his deep zone responsibility attempting to play the sail route, our receivers expect to get the ball for a walk in touch down. Releasing outside of the corner helps the quarterback distinguish if he’s going to be a true threat to the sail, and staying tight as the receiver runs past the corner forces the defender to commit to covering him because of his proximity and vertical drive.

Slide5

VS Middle of the Field Open (MOFO) Zone Coverage (Cover 2/Cover 8) – Against a cloud corner (cover 2 or cover 3 cloud), the receiver will do one of two things. 

  1. If the safety expands off the hash the receiver will push hard vertically to lift the coverage.
  2. If the safety is tight in relation to the hash the receiver will angle inward in an attempt to pin his near shoulder and increase the space outside for the sail route.

Slide5

If we get an aggressive safety that is locking up on our sail route as cover 8 defensive structures sometimes do, our outside receiver will run a post at the level of the safety. The coaching point is to close the cushion on the cornerback, then establish his angle to the post as soon as he feels the safety flatten his drop. Doing this in addition to having the sail route break slightly sooner and flatter, presents a cleaner picture for the quarterback. The receiver should take a high angle, allowing the quarterback to put air under the ball and throw him to the middle of the field.

Slide7

Read More

Wyoming A Gap Power Concept

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

 

 

Introduction

The power concept is to Midwest football as five octave harmonies are to Mariah Carey. It’s tied into the culture, born out of the necessities of pounding the ball in colder climates at the end of the year. So, when Scott Fuchs took the offensive line position under former North Dakota State head coach Craig Bohl, let’s say it was “suggested” that he learn the nuisances of how the Bison were running its A gap power play. Now nine years later at the University of Wyoming, Coach Fuchs is still finding ways to gut defense by getting the play to run as north to south as possible. And he’s doing so by coaching his linemen, and the back, several techniques to enforce an A gap entry point.

Slide1Slide1

Lateral vs. Vertical Combination Blocks

The focus of this report is on Wyoming’s “baby,” the A gap entry power concept, which coincides the lateral double team. While this concept is certainly not foreign to most programs, Wyoming does supplement it with a C gap power play. “We use the C gap play if our FB is getting his butt spilled, then we will take it outside,” said Coach Fuchs. “We want to make them defend the A gap first which makes them more vulnerable to the C gap scheme. We need to have the C gap play ready if they are filling it.”

But in order to utilize both versions of power, Coach Fuchs has to use two different types of combination blocks to the play side, a lateral combination block and a vertical combination block. “When we run the A gap power, the play side guard may be the climb player for the backside linebacker (Diagram 3) whereas in the C gap play, the tackle is expected to be the climber (Diagram 4). “On the lateral double team, the post blocker is making sure he’s in the center mass area and the hip area of the down defender,” said Coach Fuchs. “If he’s hitting the shoulder pads, we tell him don’t bother. If the guard has to climb, the backer is going to be over the top and making the play in the C gap or wider and can’t make the play. If it’s not going in the A gap, we prefer the tackle to be the climb player for the linebacker on the double team. That gets us into the vertical combination scenario.”

Slide3Slide3

Coach Fuchs details the difference between both these combination blocks below:

Slide3

Lateral Double Team Progression

So, in order to enforce the A gap entry point, Coach Fuchs teaches a lateral combination block at the point of attack. While we will detail the specific fundamentals of the lateral combination block, the teaching progression is explained below:

Slide6Slide6

Skate, Stab and Ground Footwork for Play Side Tackle

In order to create the horizontal push needed to clear the play side A gap, Coach Fuchs teaches the play side tackle to use what he calls “skate, stab, ground” footwork. “I got sick of teaching types of steps on double teams, so now we teach a full body movement,” Coach Fuchs told us. “We used to call it an ‘open’ step but we had problems with getting our hips too extended and falling down. We had to widen the base in some way. So, skating to us this means driving my right foot away from my left foot. I’m not actually picking my right foot up and taking a step. I’m driving it away from the other foot, like ice staking to use your blade.”

“Grounding means keeping our feet as close to the ground as possible, because we cannot get overextended,” said Coach Fuchs. “The ground is about position and the stab is about power, the angle that they need. The stab is about striking the defender and accelerating.” The stab and the ground come simultaneously. “For example, if I’m the right tackle, I would take position with my left foot so I’d skate and get my other foot in the ground as quick as possible because that is when I’m striking the guy,” said Coach Fuchs. “The goal is to put both feet in the ground and had more power like a power clean. Both feet would instantaneously snap to the ground. We brought more power to the double team with two feet in the ground.”

To study drill film of how Coach Fuchs teaches the Stake, Stab and Ground technique, click on the video below:

Read More

Sprint Out Game in the Run and Shoot Offense

By Justin Clark
Offensive Coordinator
Ridgeview High School (SC)
Twitter: @JustinYClark

Introduction

One of the greatest offenses ever created was the Run and Shoot offense by Glen “Tiger” Ellison. Over the years you see coaches like Mouse Davis, John Jenkins, and June Jones take this offense to the next level. One of the critiques of this offense is that it doesn’t work at the high school level because we do not have the time to dedicate to making this system work. People also suggest that it is too complicated for high school players to understand all the route conversions that we use in the “shoot.” I tell them that the proof is in the stats. In eight years running this system, we have averaged 2,279.75 yards per season and 27 TDs per season.

Coaching the run and shoot gives defenses problems, even in the modern era of zone blitzes and bracket coverages. When people hear that we are a “shoot” team, I always get people asking about the core concepts that we run (examples: Go, Choice, Read, Hook, Slide). However, I am quick to remind them that moving the pocket with our sprint game is a vital part of our offense that often times gets overlooked. Our Follow concept has been particularly successful in our sprint out game recently and that is what I will focus on for this report.

Dash Protection

While we have three different sprint protections, this article will focus on the “dash” protection. I like using a Dash protection because it allows us to have a quick game route built in as an easy access throw to the single wide receiver into the boundary. If it is there take pre-snap, we expect the QB to take it right away. If it is cloudy, the Quarterback then will get into his sprint progression.

Dash Protection Rules

Slide1

The rules for the offensive line are very simple. We tell them to run outside zone away and do not go downfield. If we call Dash Lt, the offensive line will block outside zone right and if we call Dash Rt, the offensive line block outside zone left.

The RB knows that in our Dash protection, that he is not gaining the edge as fast as our other two sprints. What we ask our back to do is to act like he is blocking our drop back protection and give the edge defender grass to the inside. We want have the defender go inside so our back to pin/seal the edge for the quarterback in the event that he sprints to that side.

Dash Follow Concept

Slide1

Slide3Slide3Slide3

Everyone we play will run a version of sprint flood. We see Flood like (Go, Flat/Bubble, Corner/Bench), Flood like (Curl, Wheel, Flat), or Flood like (Curl, Corner, Flat). We created our Follow concept because we were getting a lot of bracket and man coverages. We needed a sprint concept that was a little different than what other teams ran and were not used to seeing. This was so that those defenses would have to devote extra time to defending the concept. In doing so, we came up with Follow and it has been a great change up when we want to move the pocket and get a deep to intermediate throw. We love throwing this concept against teams that like to play some sort of bracket or man against our trips packages.

Coaching Points

The big thing for us in our Follow package is having the post WR get the attention of the near safety and take the top off of the coverage. He doesn’t know right off that he is used mainly as a decoy but after running the route they tend to recognize that. You must get that player to recognize the importance of what the post does for this play.

Read More

Defending Trips and Quads Out of 4-2-5

By Garrett Schmidt
Defensive Coordinator/DBs Coach
Huron High School (SD)
Twitter: @CoachSchmidt17

 

 

 

Introduction

Today’s offenses are all about spreading defenses out so they become unsound in the running game. In response, our coaching staff had to figure out a way to defend Trips/Quad sets while still keeping our defense sound up front. We are able to do that, partly due to being a 4-2-5 team, by allowing our Mike and Will LBs to remain in the box at all times; even against Quad sets. First, we want to first take away the run game with our alignment. Secondly, we want to take away any bubble/flat routes. When teams take their number one receiver and put him on an island, we can leave our best corner on an island with their best receiver or give him help over the top if we need to.

Defensive Backs Alignment vs. Trips/Empty

Slide1Slide1

Against Trips or Empty sets, we run like to run cover 6. For us, that means that we are running cover 4 on the passing strength side and on the weak side we are running Cover 2. This year, we also experimented with a read cover 2 and had some success on the back side with that concept. The main difference in this is if the #1 receiver goes deep (X in diagram 1). If he does, then the corner goes with him and the hybrid will then get deeper and play as a deep safety reading the entire field. In that situation, the FS needs to be aware of the #2 receiver in the coverage, which is most likely a back coming out of the backfield. Everybody still maintains their same run fits against Trips/Empty and the hybrid has weak side force and bandit has strong side force.

Coaching Points

  • The weak side cornerback must maintain outside leverage on #1 receiver and is looking for any routes coming his way from the running back or #2 receiver. If #1 receiver goes deep then he goes with him and the Hybrid will look for anything out of the backfield or any crossing routes.
  • Hybrid needs to get depth, we have him align at 10-12 yards, so he can see the entire field and get overtop of #1 if need be.

Defensive Backs Alignment v. Quads

Read More

Managing Off-Season Communications and Scheduling

By X&O Labs
Twitter: @XandOLabs 

 

Over the past couple of years we’ve highlighted the many ways MaxOne is striving to make football coaches’ lives easier and become more effective coaches.  

From being an all-in-one communication system for your entire program, to managing your program’s multi-layered schedules and calendars, to sport specific workouts that track results of individual players—MaxOne has given many of our readers an organizational advantage during the off-season.  

In fact, we’ve profiled many of our readers who use MaxOne in their programs and, as many of you will remember, we also conducted an RPO Summer School Course, highlighted how Communication Drives a Winning Culture, and co-developed the best practices for summer. 

With the off-season upon us, we’re excited to bring you the latest update from MaxOne. The MaxOne athlete facing Apple and Android app is complete and ready for your athletes and parents to download! 

Read More

21 Hour Football Program – Case 1: Creating a Culture of Participation Growth

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

 

Introduction: Defining the 21-Hour High School Football Program

 

The game of football is changing—and so is the rest of the world.

Pick up a newspaper—or check Facebook—and you’ll see all the latest reports about how participation in football is in decline. Outsiders cite concussions and injuries as the main driver of this trend, while coaches point to sport specialization as the real cause. As football researchers, we set out to better understand the real “why” behind the decline—and bring solutions back to the industry that could grow the game.

That was 18 months ago—and what we actually found during our research was far greater than what we had hoped to discover.

Just like any problem in football, there are thousands of coaches who face the same issue. And within those thousands of coaches, there are true innovators who see these problems as opportunities—opportunities to absolutely crush the ‘roadblock’ and build something bigger and better.

Yes—we found solutions to these problems. Real solutions that can grow the game of football. That was not surprising being we have a network of over 60,000 football coaches—most of which are at the high school level.

The truly exciting development we discovered through our research was a small group of coaches who are re-building their programs to achieve higher levels of success in an ever-changing culture, society and world—and, here’s the fun part, they’re winning more games!

In this book, you’ll learn how these programs are growing participation numbers, building strong partnerships with administrations, parents, the community—and inning more games!

How are they doing it?

Simple. It’s a new shift in thinking. These coaches are spending more time developing their programs to win in the 21 hours before and after practice. Don’t get us wrong—practice is a very critical part of building a successful program, but these high school coaches have found to truly reach the peak levels of success, you have to win in the hallways, administration offices, parents’ living rooms, and down on main street.

Is it easy? No, but neither is winning.

It doesn’t matter how well your program is functioning right now. It doesn’t matter if you’re barely holding on or you’ve just won consecutive state championships—use the ideas in this book to re-build your program into one that can face all the headwinds that our ever-changing world will throw at it—and, here’s the fun part, win more games!

Here is what you are going to find in this exclusive Special Report. (Note: Links for each case are provided at the end of this page.)

Case 1: Creating a Culture of Participation Growth

  • Chapter 1: “Having an Anticipatory, Not Reactionary Mindset”
  • Chapter 2: Retaining Freshmen Football Players
  • Chapter 3: Combating Sports Specialization
  • Chapter 4: Winning Over the Moms
  • Chapter 5: Team Building: Developing the “Family Dynamic” of a Football Program

Case 2: The Movement to Make the Game Safer

  • Chapter 1: The Reality Behind the Perceived Concussion Problem in High School Football
  • Chapter 2: Educating Parents on Current Safety Advancements
  • Chapter 3: New Practice Methodologies That Are Less Taxing on Players
  • Chapter 4: Products That Promote Safety

Case 3: Developing Staff & Community Buy-In

  • Chapter 1: Protocols of Staff Development
  • Chapter 2: Protocols for Coaches That Work Out of District
  • Chapter 3: Community Outreach
  • Chapter 4: Reflections on Football in the Community

Case 4: Who Are You? The First Step to Building a Program

Case 5: Build Accountability by “Vesting” Players

Case 6: 3-Step Plan to Develop an “Uncommon” Program Identity

 

Chapter 1: Stilmulating Participation and Program Growth

Read More

21 Hour Football Program – Case 2: The Movement to Make the Game Safer

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

 

Chapter 1: The “Reality” Behind the Perceived Concussion Problem in High School Football

 

Introduction

Coaches know that the game of football has never been safer. But we also know that it’s never been harder to coach. It’s no longer the on-field endeavors that consume us. That’s become the easy part. These days our time is torn between taking CPR/first aid certification, heat acclimation courses and becoming versed on concussion protocols. But do the parents know how well versed we’ve become in these issues? We can’t assume they do. So it becomes necessary for us to tell them. While some coaches use a single spring parents meeting to do so, other chose to develop a consistent, streamlined method as a form of constant communication. As Bedford High School (VA) head coach Chris Watts told us, “Coaches are doing a great job of protecting their players, but a poor job of protecting their sports’ reputation.  Parents need to hear about the measures that coaches are taking to keep players safe, and it’s just not happening.”

So what do you say? How do you communicate the vision of your program? Before we detail how successful coaches educate parents on how their program is promoting safety, we wanted to provide the hard facts behind why football is safer than ever.  We wanted to profile two recent studies related to this topic as well as provide tangible evidence from world-renowned neurosurgeons on this topic.

“No Association Between Playing High School Football and Brain Injuries”

Source: JAMA Neurology, July 3rd, 2017

According to a report published in JAMA Neurology on July 3rd, there is no statistically or clinically significant harmful association between playing football in high school and increased cognitive impairment or depression later in life. The study was designed to estimate the association of playing high school football with cognitive impairment and depression at the age of 65. A representative sample of male high school students who graduated from high school in Wisconsin in 1957 was studied. In this cohort study using data from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, football players were matched between March 1 and July 1, 2017, with controls along several baseline covariates such as adolescent IQ, family background, and educational level. For robustness, three versions of the control condition were considered: all controls, those who played a non-collision sport, and those who did not play any sport.

Among the 3,904 men in the study, after matching and model-based covariate adjustment, compared with each control condition, there was no statistically significant harmful association of playing football with a reduced composite cognition score. After adjustment for multiple testing, playing football did not have a significant adverse association with any of the secondary outcomes, such as the likelihood of heavy alcohol use at 65 years of age.

According to the report, “For men who attended high school in the late 1950s, playing high school football did not appear to be a major risk factor for later-life cognitive impairment or depression. For current athletes, this study provides information on the risk of playing sports today that have a similar head trauma exposure risk as high school football played in the 1950’s. Cognitive and depression outcomes later in life were found to be similar for high school football players and their nonplaying counterparts from mid-1950s in Wisconsin. The risks of playing football today might be different than in the 1950’s, but for current athletes, this study provides information on the risk of playing sports today that have a similar risk of head trauma as high school football played in the 1950’s.”

The full-length report on this can be read by clicking here.

“Female Soccer Players Suffer the Most Concussions in High School Sports”

Source: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, March 14, 2017

It is also a known fact that girls suffer more concussions than boys when competing in high school sports per participation rates. Girls soccer in particular is the most dangerous sport for head trauma, according to a newly released study by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. Three researchers studied data from 100 American high schools spread across 11 years to track the number of concussions reported against all other injury types. Overall, the researchers counted 6,399 concussions against 40,843 total injuries, with girls suffering a “significantly higher” rate of concussions than boys and girls’ soccer standing out as the single most common sport for head trauma. “The study authors hypothesize that girls may face a greater risk of concussions and other injuries in soccer due to a lack of protective gear, an emphasis on in-game contact and the practice of ‘headers’—hitting the ball with your head,” the study reads.

“While American football has been both scientifically and colloquially associated with the highest concussion rates, our study found that girls, and especially those who play soccer, may face a higher risk,” said lead author and Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine orthopedics professor Dr. Wellington Hsu. “The new knowledge presented in this study can lead to policy and prevention measures to potentially halt these trends.”

Read More

21 Hour Football Program – Case 3: Developing Staff and Community “Buy-In”

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

 

 

Chapter 1: Protocols of Staff Development

 

Culture starts at the top. It’s instituted by the head coach, then trickles down to the players. But the key liaison between the players and the head coach are the assistant coaches. They are the ones that need to carry the philosophy forward. If they are all in-line, the chances of success improve. If they are providing mixed messages, the program can falter, and falter quickly. We all know this as coaches. But as a head coach, how do you get them in line with your beliefs? How do you get them to “buy in” to what you’re selling? In the ever-transient high school coaching world, many times assistant coaches are leaving to take administrative jobs, spend more time with their family or decide to part ways with the sport altogether.

So, we decided to research how coaches retain their staff after they build it and asked the tough questions like, is it even important to retain the staff? One thing we did find is that 76 percent of coaches that won at least 50 percent of their games the last three seasons said they’ve had zero or one coach leave the program each year.

We wanted to research how these successful coaches were retaining their staff year after year. Because let’s face it, familiarity does breed success. Once players get to know the staff, and those faces don’t change, a culture of comfort and trust will ensue. “Many coaches, one message” is what we call it. What we found that two components were key in keeping coaches: involvement and accountability.

Involvement in aspects of the program, aside from just the physical domain and accountability to affirm that there is a constant give and take between the staff and players. In order to validate our research, we asked one question to these coaches:

How, specifically, have you given your assistant coaches accountability (either on or off the field) in the development of your program?

Their responses are below:

Tom Wilson, Head Football Coach, Dowling Catholic High School (IA):

“My coaches have a say in many of the things we do. To list a few:

  • “Position groups
  • Social media promotion
  • Involved in setting the culture and teachings of our program.
  • Senior book read
  • Newsletter
  • Share weight room responsibility
  • Share speed work responsibility”

Mike O’Donnell, Head Football Coach, Archbishop Stepinac High School (NY):

“Our assistant coaches are very involved in every aspect of program. We use them in game planning and in scouting. We use a no huddle offense so numerous coaches are involved in getting signals in and are not just standing around on sidelines. We have an offensive coordinator and defensive coordinator who I trust to call the games. We have another coach who is fully in charge of special teams. By setting up this system, our kids really get coached and are ready to move on to college level.

Our practice plan is one that has a 5-minute clock on each session. It keeps the kids attention. It forces coaches to be organized when going onto field.”

Rodney Saulsberry, Head Football Coach, Whitehaven High School (TN):

“75% of my staff are alumni of the program, so they have a vested interest in our development of young men. Also, I believe in coaching my coaches and giving them responsibilities and freedom to lead their position groups and units on offense, defense and special teams.”

Denny Diduch, Head Football Coach, Forreston High School (IL):

“My coaches all have position responsibilities that they are responsible for devising the drills to master technique at their positions. All coaches have access to Sunday prep meetings where they can voice concerns, ideas, etc. We open every game with a 12-play script that influences how we run practice all week. After week three, the assistant coaches come up with the script. All coaches are given specific roles and assignments that they are in charge of and can develop their own strategies to improve. On game nights, coaches are given a specific position to watch on both sides of the ball. They are then to report what they see to the OC/DC. Coaches are encouraged to continue presenting new ideas and strategies no matter how many times they get shot down.”

Coach/Player Mentor Programs:

While some assistant coaches responsibilities are relegated to on-field roles, other programs implement off-field mentorship models to develop the player/coach relationship. While this is not uncommon for college programs, where coaches are full time employees, organizing this at the high school level takes some coordination and follow through. For Ken Leonard, the Head Football Coach at Sacred Heart Griffin High School (IL) it became a necessity to implement these programs. He designed it two years ago, where each coach is assigned to 5-6 athletes. They will meet with each of them for only five minutes per week to discuss anything that is happening in their lives. “We are a private catholic school,” Coach Leonard told us. “We mentor and make players as great husbands and people. A coach has more influence in one year than anyone else has in his or her whole lives. Parents send their kids here for a purpose and it’s because of football. Our things carry over from the field. We needed to do more than just character development.”

The way the

Read More

21 Hour Football Program – Case 4: The First Step to Building a Program

By Brian Hill
Head Football Coach
Garden City High School (KS)
Twitter: @coachbhill

 

Introduction:

Eight years ago I had the privilege to receive my first opportunity to be a Head Football Coach at Garden City High School (KS). Garden City, KS sits in the Southwest corner of Kansas, 70 miles from the Colorado border and 75 miles from the Oklahoma border. We participate in the largest classification in Kansas (6A). We are one of 32 teams in our classification and 30 of them are at least 200 miles away from us. The majority of the teams in our classification are in or around the Wichita and Kansas City areas. I had spent the previous 15 years coaching in the Kansas Junior College system as an assistant. This coaching experience provided opportunities to visit and watch from afar how successful Kansas high school coaches ran and developed their programs.

During the decade of the 1990’s were the best years that Garden City High School had ever had, winning 70% of their games and the State Championship in 1999. Then with the departure of the coach and an ever-changing world, Garden City went through many changes within our community. The next decade would see a shift in the economy and change of demographics. During the 2016 school year at Garden City High School, there were 22 languages spoken by students from 25 different nations. Over 30% of our students are English Language Learners and 65% of our population is considered economically disadvantaged. Our enrollment during the 2016 school year was 68% Hispanic, 23% white and 9% other. Eight years ago, when I got the job I was told that it was going to be difficult to compete in such a large classification with a small pool of athletes to choose from compared to many other schools our size. Our isolation in far western Kansas was also going to be a challenge as school funding in our state has become a major factor and fewer and fewer schools have the funds to travel to fill our schedule. I heard a lot of reasons why I shouldn’t be successful but no one was looking for solutions to lessen the impact of these factors. 

The first action step was to sit down with my assistant coaches and have them tell me all the reasons in their opinion why we weren’t being successful and what the other schools had that we didn’t. I took notes and typed up every single reason and began looking for ways to compensate for them. As many of the great athletes and coaches have said, it was time to turn negatives into positives. Since that spring in 2010 we have won 65% of our games, won three conference championships and made it to the 6A state semi-finals where we lost to the eventual champions. This past season we completed the first undefeated regular season in 25 years. Below are four areas that are not uncommon practices to turn a program around, but maybe unorthodox methods to achieve them.

Family Culture:

First and foremost, all good coaches know that they can’t do it alone and hiring a quality staff is critical. I wanted to find guys who wanted to be here because not everyone wants to live and raise a family in Garden City, Kansas. Secondly, I wanted guys I can trust and share the same passion and vision as I did. I was very fortunate that when I took the job here there were two assistants that I had coached in junior college already on staff, which made for an easier transition because they knew me and my personality. Going into this fall, I now will have 7 of my 11 assistants at the high school level that are guys that I have coached at some point in my career. I think it is critical with today’s athletes to present a coach to them that they can relate to. Fortunately for me, many of the former players that I have hired are former college athletes as well. Young coaches with energy and the experience of being in their shoes provide a great platform for high school athletes.

The second most important part of creating a family culture with so many kids with different backgrounds is team building activities. With so many of my kids that don’t get many family vacations or opportunities to see the bright lights of big cities, we try to take advantage of every opportunity we can to provide that experience. For example, one summer while we attended a team camp in Oklahoma, we took a tour of the athletic facilities at Oklahoma State University on the way home, even though it was slightly out of the way. Most of my kids have never been on a Division I school campus, nor will ever get much of an opportunity to play at that level. Getting to walk thru the locker room, onto the field and thru meeting rooms allow them to dream a little bit which creates possibilities in their minds. We have also attended Major League baseball games, gone to water parks and even played paintball on our camp trips. These create great opportunities for players and coaches to get to know one another on a more personable level, rather than just the traditional coach-player relationship on the football field. We take the time to discuss issues about how and why it is important to becoming leaders on our team, in our school, and in our community. The relationships our coaches have with our players feed into all areas of their lives on and off the field. They provide the leadership and discipline in a young athlete’s life to help set them up for success in the future.

Read More