Designing Tackling Systems – Case 1: Developing Your Tackling System

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

Introduction

In recent years, tackling has shifted more into a science than a fundamental. As evidenced by various methodologies (the Seattle Seahawk Tackling progression and Heads Up Football) have strived to take the head out of tackling, coaches are continuously trying to find methods to both help their players become more efficient tacklers and protect them from injury.

When conducting our initial research on this topic, we struggled with our focus. We wanted to provide our coaches with answers (mainly in the form of drill work) to correct the most problematic issues their players were having in tackling, such as keeping the head up, driving through the tackle, keeping proper leverage, etc. However, as we started the interview process with our contributors, we found that there was a pocket of coaches who have developed their own “tackling system” to fit the needs of their players and the circumstances in which these tackles are made. So rather than rollout a drill catalog of 100+ random tackling drills (many of which can be considered to be outdated), we wanted to provide coaches with a framework of a system that helps them create and develop the drill work which reinforces the proper tackling techniques and helps their defenders fix the most common errors in tackling. We’ve found that your system can be established in the following ways:

  • Studying each opponents’ offensive system to assess which types of tackling situations your defenders may be involved in. This has a lot to do with the personnel of your opponent. For example, are they based in spread sets where open field tackling may be more inherent or are they more heavily grounded in 12, 22 personnel based as an inside the box run team?
  • Studying opponents’ offensive personnel to assess which kinds of tackling situations you believe your defenders will encounter during the season. This can be done by reviewing prior game film from other opponents.
  • Studying your own personnel to evaluate which types of tackles (either based on scenarios or fundamentals) they are missing and take corrective actions to fix these problems.

In case one, we present a series of questions that we geared to our contributors which focus specifically on which elements they use to develop their system, how they identify either scenario based of fundamental based tackling errors and how much in-season practice time is devoted to correcting these tackling issues. Below is a key of the coaches that contributed to this study:

Contributor Key (in Alphabetical Order):

Joey Didier (JD): Defensive Coordinator, University of St. Francis (IN)

Vincent DiGaetano (VD): Defensive Analyst, Wagner University (NY)

Matt Entz (ME): Defensive Coordinator, North Dakota State University

Chris Kappas (CK): Defensive Coordinator, Mount Union University (OH)

Jamie Marshall (JM): Defensive Line Coach, Lindenwood University (MO)

Matt McLagan (MM): Defensive Coordinator, Northern State University (SD)

Jay Niemann (JN): Defensive Coordinator, Rutgers University

Mike Siravo (MS): Defensive Coordinator, Temple University

Eric Schmidt (ES): Defensive Coordinator, North Dakota University

 

Why is it important to have a “tackling system,” rather than a series of drills in teaching tackling to your players?

JD: “Tackling is the cornerstone of defensive football. There is no schematic answer to your players not being able to bring down an opponent’s ball carrier. Having a tackling system is important for three reasons: 

1: It creates teaching consistency among your defensive staff. 

2: It carries over to all positions and can be applied to all situations.   

3: It creates focus and buy-in with your players as to why tackling will help them be successful, and most importantly keep them safe.”

VG: “Three reasons I believe:

1: Develops common language among players and coaches.

2: It allows for drill work to focus on different segments of tackling consistent with system.

Read More

Designing Tackling Systems – Case 2: Reinforcing Proper Body Placement in Open Field Tackling

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

Introduction

We’ll start with perhaps the most common error in any open-field tackling situations: incorrect body placement. It seems to be the number one issue during the approach of a ball carrier.  So whether you’re teaching the shimmy technique, the break down technique or the long stride/short stride technique, it’s imperative to address how you want to make sure your defenders essentially come in at ball level.

It was Rutgers University head coach Chris Ash that told us he studied film on how tackles were made, not missed, before developing his system. Below is a tutorial from North Dakota University on tackles made with proper body placement.

Read More

Designing Tackling Systems – Case 3: Reinforcing Tracking Issues in One-on-One Tackling Situations

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

Introduction

Once the proper body positioning is taught in the open field, it becomes necessary for defenders to use the proper leverage points to make a tackle. Commonly referred to as “tracking” the ball carrier, we’ve found that leverage seems to be the most referred to word in teaching tackling and various coaches teach leverage are examined in this case. Leverage can pertain to both the area of the field (sideline, force or cutback) and it can also pertain to the leverage the defender has on the ball carrier (inside out, head up or outside in).

It was Rutgers University head coach Chris Ash that told us he studied film on how tackles were made, not missed, before developing his system. Below is a tutorial from Northern State University on both force tackle situations and cutback tackle situations.

Below is a tutorial on force tackle situations from Northern State University:

Read More

Designing Tackling Systems – Case 4: Reinforcing Multiple Defender Leverage Points on Ball Carrier

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

Explanation

Most commonly referred to as “losing the cup” losing multiple defender leverage points on a ball carrier are another common issue in tackling. What should usually result in an immediate tackling situation can turn into a substantial gain if one or more of those defenders lose leverage. While this all may depend on coverage structure, it’s essential that defenders know and understand which responsibility they have in each run situation.

It was Rutgers University head coach Chris Ash that told us he studied film on how tackles were made, not missed, before developing his system. Below is a tutorial from Northern State University on what it calls “Vice” tackle, where three defenders converge on a ball carrier.

Read More

Designing Tackling Systems – Case 5: Reinforcing Proper Strike Points on Contact

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

Explanation

Once the approach mastered and the proper leverage is attained, the defender needs to “finish” on the ball carrier by bringing him down to the ground. How coaches implement this fundamental in their system varies. Some use mats, some use agile bags and some use bodies. Below are the specific drills that teach this phase of tackling.

What we found most common is coaches teaching a “near leg, near shoulder” contact point on the tackle. It has become imperative for defenders to get that lead foot in the ground before making contact. For example, if a defender is making contact with his left shoulder, his left foot should be in the ground and vice versa.

It was Rutgers University head coach Chris Ash that told us he studied film on how tackles were made, not missed, before developing his system. Below is a tutorial from North Dakota University on tackles were made with the near leg, near shoulder contact points.

Read More

Designing Tackling Systems – Case 6: Implementing the Rugby Style Tackling System

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

Introduction

Back in 2014 the Seattle Seahawk Rugby tackling video went viral sending hundreds of coaches to reconsider how they were teaching tackling. One of these coaches was Chris Ash, the former Ohio State University co-defensive coordinator who is now the head coach at Rutgers University. According to Coach Ash, when he first viewed the Seahawk tackling video, he simply took he drills he viewed (along with googling ‘rugby tacking’ on the internet) and directly implemented these drills. It was all he knew how to do.

But now two years later, Atavus (http://www.atavus.com)- the Seattle based company that was behind that Seahawk drill tape- has put together a system on how you can design and implement the rugby tackling system in your program. XandOLabs.com spent a weekend in Philadelphia with the Atavus crew as they clinicked us on how they are developing their system to suit the needs of football coaches. Below is a sneak peek on some of the newer progressions they are designing this off-season as it pertains to transitioning rugby style tackling to the game of football.

Two-Step Process

In Atavus’ teaching progression, tackling takes a form of a two-step process: a tracking zone and a tackling zone. The definition of these two are below:

Tracking Zone- Pre-contact phase used to maximize potential contact. It’s defined as a controlled movement phase.

Tackling Zone- Contact phase where the goal is to maximize power and control over the ball carrier.

According to Rex Norris, head of football development at Atavus, when these two measures are combined it creates a positive tackling situation.

Tracking Phase

In the tracking zone, the goal is to close space on the ball carrier and limit his options. “This is about identifying the target and starting the correct pursuit angles by being continuously under control,” said Coach Norris. According to Coach Norris, there are three phases to the pre-contact zone:

Read More

Designing Tackling Systems – Bonus Case: The Buzzword Catalog of Tackling

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

Introduction

Football is a game of short bursts and shorter words, so in this case we wanted to provide coaches with the specific verbiage our contributors are using to teach tackling. While some of these words may be familiar, there are different ways to say the same thing to your players and a coach never knows which words will stick. We asked our coaches the following question:

Which common buzzwords do you use to teach tackling with your players?

Mount Union University Buzzword Catalog (Chris Kappas, Defensive Coordinator)

Full Speed as Long as Possible: “We talk about going full speed as long as you can to close out the space (between you and the ball carrier). You can’t give defenders a landmark because it’s a feel thing. It’s not three yards, etc. The goal is to get that near foot shimmy to step on that ball carrier’s toes. You have to break down close enough where he can make moves but you need to be far enough where he can’t run straight through you if you miss the arm tackle.”

 

Lindenwood University Buzzword Catalog (Jamie Marshall, Defensive Line Coach)- Rugby Style Emphasis

Tracking the Near Thigh: “We talk about tracking the near thigh (instead of the near hip) because as you track the ball carrier the near thigh always tells you where the receiver or the ball carrier is going. Your eyes can get lost if it’s up on the hip because that can lead to the belly button. We went to the near thigh. Wherever your eyes are looking your body is going to take you. We talk eyes to the thigh, wrap and squeeze. You can’t look at the hip if you’re asked to contact the thigh.”

Shoulders Through Thighs: This pertains to the finish component of the roll tackle where a defender’s shoulders makes contact with the ball carriers thighs.

Run or Roll: This pertains to the decision that the defender makes post contact on whether or not to run through the tackle or roll through the tackle.

 

North Dakota State University Buzzword Catalog (Matt Entz, Defensive Coordinator)

Hit Up Position: “We don’t use the phrase coming to balance because I think it brings out some different thought processes for kids. If I just said ‘be careful to keep your balance,’ the general player will widen his feet and drop his center of gravity where his footwork is outside of his frame. Now if that ball carrier changes direction I’m going to have to step underneath myself to recover. What we talk a lot about is getting to a hit up position where my feet are under my armpits.”

Read More

Protecting Your Base RPOs with Quick Game Variations

By David Buchanan & Harrison Ingels
Head Football Coach & Offensive Coordinator
Quabbin Regional High School (MA)
Twitter: @QRHSfballcoach

Introduction

At Quabbin Regional High School, we are a spread offense that relies heavily on our RPO scheme to protect our run game. We are 10 personnel base and we usually see a 6-man box every snap. Our RPOs are designed to attack edge defenders. This is not that different from what many others do. What we have added is the ability to attack the defender that is being assigned to make that tackle against the pass in the event of an RPO (usually safeties or corners).

In the past few years, we have seen that when we run our spot or bubble RPO those are the defenders who usually are the second players in. Our goal is to put them in conflict when we run our RPO protection concepts. When we are looking at when to call RPO run, we treat it like play action pass, when are the safeties/corners flying up to make the tackle on bubble, spot, or slant. If they’re flying up field too fast, we throw a vertical route to take advantage of the space they created.

In the 2016 season, we were able to leverage these concepts to protect our base RPOs and run game. This allowed us to be the highest scoring offense in our region’s history (43.2 PPG) and our receivers and QB set multiple school and regional records. We also were able to win our first league championship and qualified for playoffs for the second time in history.

Bubble-Go

Slide1

This is an RPO variation concept designed to protect an RPO bread and butter for most offenses. We will run a lot of bubble concept, especially against odd coverage teams with a weak coverage linebacker or an alignment for that linebacker that really gives us a lot of space. Our traditional bubble comes with us blocking hard on the corner with our wide receiver while the slot or a running back running the bubble behind that block. When teams adjust their corners to jam the receiver or the corner starts coming downhill when he reads bubble, we call our “bubble-go” concept. When reading this concept, your QB should be reading the corner. If the corner gets flat footed or comes down hill, it’s an easy shot down the field to your outside receiver. If the corner bails, the bubble is wide open. It’s a simple post snap read that can produce big plays.

For us, bubble-go is the actual play call. We would call it “inside zone right bubble-go.” Everyone is running inside zone, with our RPO tag being a bubble and a go route. We show some variations on film with TEs that made us more variable and gave defenses more to prepare for when it came to our formations, most created big plays for us (20< yards).

You’ll see a couple of different variations on this concept on this video. There’s our traditional bubble fade out of 2×2, a variation out of double tight with arc motion and a tight end running a vertical, and a variation out of a single tight set with the tight end running the “bubble” as a speed out and the flanker going vertical. This is another play we run to counter the teams that fly to our RPO scheme and break their keys, usually for huge gainers. You wind up with four options (run, QB run, bubble, and fade) every play, although depending on the experience and skill level of the QB you may want to tell him it is an “always throw” play. We’ve had to coach it both ways depending on the QB.

To study game film of this concept, click on the video below:

Read More

Delegating Staff Assignments for Weekly Offensive Game Planning

By Justin Iske
Offensive Line Coach
Southwestern Oklahoma State
Twitter: @justiniske 

 

Introduction

In January 2015, I was blessed with the opportunity to join the coaching staff at SWOSU. Our head coach, Dan Cocannouer, our passing game coordinator, Jon Garfield, and myself all had coordinator experience and our own ideas on how to fix the struggles that we had on offense in 2014. Meshing our three separate, but similar, philosophies and incorporating nine new starters on the offensive side of the ball was our challenge. The purpose of this report is to go through the game planning process that was the results of our meetings. This is the process that we use for a typical game week and communication on game day. Note that this report will assume that game day is Saturday.

Sunday: Here at SWOSU, Sunday is our players’ day off. Our coaches will grade their position and special teams segment, and complete our self-scout during the day. We will meet as a staff at 5:00 PM to go through the highlights and/or lowlights from Saturday. We also use Sunday as a day to watch film of our upcoming opponent on our own. We split up our self-scout and opponent breakdown as follows.

  • QB/WRs Coach: Breakdown (Coverages) / Self Scout (Personnel / Passing Game)
  • RBs Coach: Breakdown (Fronts / Depth Chart) / Self Scout (YAC / 3rd & 4th Downs)
  • TEs Coach: Breakdown (Fronts) / Self Scout (Run-Pass Tendencies / Red Zone / Backed Up)
  • OL Coach: Breakdown (Blitz / Stunt) / Self Scout (Overall / Run Game / Protections / Goal Line)

Monday: In the morning, we will get together as a staff and determine what personnel groups / formations we are going to stress for the week. The two biggest things we use to make this decision are our self-scout from the past three to four weeks and our opponent film from the past three to weeks. It is important that we continue to do things that our players do well, but at the same time, we have to make sure that we are not too predictable based on formation, down and distance, etc. In the afternoon, we will watch Saturday’s game with our players and begin to introduce our upcoming opponent’s base fronts and coverages. By the end of the day, we will create a ready list of our base runs and passes for the week. The key to this process is having enough offense to keep the defense on their toes, but not so much that we can’t practice everything that we have for the week.

Tuesday: The offensive staff will watch film of our opponent in the red zone, goal line and backed up. We will then put together our game plan for these situations. In practice on Tuesday, we work 60% of our team time on first and second down (open field) and 40% of the time on red zone, goal line, and backed up. We also work good on good against our defense on red zone and inside run.

Read More

Simplifying Communication to Defend High Tempo Offense

By Bart Bruner
Defensive Coordinator/Inside Linebacker Coach
St. Xavier High School (KY)
Twitter: @bbruner4

Introduction:

Have you ever confused a player you are coaching because you used too many words? 

Has one of your coaches ever slowed down practice because he is explaining something to one player? 

Has one of your players ever been confused because two coaches gave him conflicting instructions?

Have two coaches on your staff ever tried to call the same formation or play two different names?  

These and other questions are issues our defensive staff at St. Xavier High School (Louisville, KY) has tried to address by attempting to improve our communication. Many staffs have turnover in coaches from year to year and also decide to change or alter their scheme which ultimately leads to challenges in communication between coaches and consistency in coach-player communication.   

Over the past two years, our defensive staff has worked extensively to improve our structure and system of communication and teaching. Our goal is to have a scheme and techniques that are simple, as well as a system of communication that is efficient for coaches and players. We have evaluated everything to ensure we are talking the same language with each other and with our players. We also have attempted to streamline our communication so we can coach faster. Our scheme calls, techniques, checks, teaching progressions, and coaching points have all been evaluated, scrutinized, and sometimes adapted to reach these goals.

Many of our opponents are multiple in scheme, formation, motion, shift, and personnel groups, as well as various tempos. This has made our goal of simplicity more challenging as we are forced to check defensive calls and adjust alignments sometimes multiple times in one play. This article will attempt to explain our process and purpose.

Who We Are:

Like most other staffs, all of our decisions are based upon a philosophy that we have developed and believe in. Our defensive philosophy is simple:

  1. Be More Physical than the Offense
  2. Be Gap Sound & Zone Sound
  3. Keep the Passing Game in Front of You
  4. Fanatical Effort 4-6 Seconds, Point A to B: Full Speed.  (Borrowed from Ohio State)

Our scheme is 3-4 Slant/Angle Front with multiple zone coverages. Our personnel and call system are field and boundary based. We believe our calls and communication must be simple and efficient to defend the best offenses we face. We focus on emphasizing great technique, block destruction, pursuit, and tackling as opposed to multiple schemes and calls.   

Many of our opponents’ offenses, especially our biggest two rivals, are multiple in scheme, formation, motion, shift, and personnel groups, as well as various tempos.  We use our two rivals’ offenses as a litmus test for all we install on defense. They have had extremely successful programs, especially offensively, for many years.  They are known for their complexity and multiplicity, as well as for their great execution.

Will our scheme hold up?  Can we easily recognize all formations, motions, and shifts?  Can we keep our call vs. Empty, Quads, or Unbalanced formations?  Can we clearly and quickly communicate any and all necessary checks before the ball is snapped?  How much practice time will it take to get all the above executed with a high level of confidence?   These are all questions we ask ourselves as we continue to evolve defensively each off-season.  We continue to evaluate the answers to these questions as we install in the pre-season and in game planning from week to week during the season.  We often use our philosophy stated above to remind ourselves and our players of what is most important and how we ultimately want to be playing defense.  We strive to insure that communication lines are open on both ends.  We ask our players questions constantly and demand answers, as well as attempt to recognize difficult concepts and plan for them accordingly.

Simplifying Communication:

Read More

North Dakota’s 7 Drills to Teach WR Separation

By Danny Freund
Wide Receivers Coach
University of North Dakota (ND)
Twitter: @dfreund7

Introduction:

We use the following seven drills to emphasize creating separation and attacking the ball at the top of routes. We also want to drill catching the ball, tucking it and turning upfield quickly. We believe in these techniques and want to drill them as much as possible in individual drills and winter/spring/summer season work. Much of our practice time as wide receivers is dedicated to running full routes on air, 1-on-1 or against the defense. These seven drills allow us to save legs and focus attention on the details that give us an advantage getting open and maximizing yards after catch.

Drill #1: Burst Drill

We use this drill to work changing speeds in and out of breaks. The focus is on keeping eyes up and arms tight to the beltline. It is important to emphasize sinking the hips at the top of the route and keeping our feet alive. The players should be on the balls of our feet and keep spacing in our feet to maintain balance. Exploding out of the break and changing speeds fast is important to create separation. We want to work this while maintaining the proper arm drive, eye focus and pad level.

We don’t anything to “tell” the DB when we are breaking our route off. These include looking down with our eyes, decelerating before the break point, having arms get away from our body or beltline, and changing our shoulder pad level drastically. I like to stand at the finish of the drill to determine if anything the receiver is doing is telling the defensive back that he is about to make a break. We talk about selling vertical with speed in most routes we run. They must attack the DB’s cushion and make him uncomfortable. As a change-up to train violent hips and simulate a double move, we will also work a quick one-two stutter at each cone while sinking hips and maintaining balance. At the final cone, we work the top of a curl or comeback working back to the QB.

Slide1

To study film of this drill, click on the video below:

Read More

Implementing a Takeaway System for Game Week

By Tunde Agboke
Defensive Coordinator & Assistant Head Coach
SUNY Cortland (NY)
Twitter: @CoachAgboke

 

Introduction

When I was player, my coaches always use to say, “the ball is the thing, the ball is the thing.” As a player, I understood to an extent what they meant. They were preaching the importance of getting turnovers and possessing the ball. That part was clear, what I didn’t realize at that part of my football career, is there was a subliminal part to his message.

The words themselves are clear. “The ball is thing!” He who possesses the ball possesses the power. There are no rules on the books that say the football belongs to the offense. Every time the ball is snapped, possession is a 50/50 proposition. The moment defensive players come to grips with that general concept, the more likely the defense is to create and secure turnovers.

The subliminal part of the message wasn’t so easy to parse as a player. We heard the message on a daily basis, “the ball is the thing, the ball is the thing.” Looking back now, I realize what they were doing was planting seeds. The more they talked about turnovers, the more we as players would think about turnovers. The more we thought about turnovers, the more likely we were to secure them.

Turnovers aren’t some magical guarantee that you will win the game. We have all been a part of games where we won the turnover margin but lost the game. However, they do give you a better chance to win. As a coach, I’ve taken that same approach. We want turnovers, so we are always going to talk about turnovers. Not just on the field at practice and on game days, but in meetings rooms and anywhere we can. Gaining turnovers requires a whole hearted cultural shift and adoption of that mantra.

Forcing & Recovering Fumbles

In the last two seasons, we have forced a combined 35 fumbles. While this is an impressive stat, it has also been a tricky undertaking. In trying to force fumbles, at times players will sacrifice making the tackle. We have tried to maintain and reiterate the importance of both, since they are not mutual exclusive. When coaching the pursuit of fumbles, we focus on the following three techniques; edge rushers bending, the 2nd man into the tackle stripping, and recovery. Below is game film and drill film as well as coaching points for these techniques.

Bending Edge Rushers – Burst, Bend, Stay Tight, Drop, & Swat

To study film of this, click on the video below:

Read More

Sam Houston State’s Bubble/X Screen Run Tag

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

  

Introduction

case3picThe following research was conducted in part of XandOLabs.com special report on “Sam Houston State’s Air Raid Evolution.”

Bubble/X Screen Tag

This is a trips concept where the bubble screen is paired with a trips screen concept to the single receiver side. It is usually paired with an interior run scheme like inside zone or power. The quarterback makes the pre-snap decision based off leverage.

Read More

Using Read Coverage to Defend Three-Man Surface Runs

By Zach Davis
Head Football Coach
Riverside High School (WV)
Twitter: @zachdavis24

Introduction:

Read coverage is one of the base concepts of our defense because it can adapt to many different formations. It allows us to get our safeties and corners involved in the run game while adjusting the run support based on the formation. It handles every formation an offense can use while giving you max numbers against the run and being able pattern match in the secondary. We really like it versus TE runs to the field because it puts our safeties into the run fit based on the release of the TE.

Base Concept

We use a traditional 50 defense where we are rushing 5 defenders on the majority of our snaps. We have the ability to drop our Ends (OLB’s) into coverage, but it is not something we do often. We also use a variety of blitzes with our inside linebackers to attack the A, B, C and D gap.

The run fits remain the same for our Ends, ILB’s, Tackles, and Nose regardless of what coverage is called, which allows our players to play fast! Our Ends are force / BCR (boot, counter, reverse) players that will squeeze all down blocks and play the quarterback versus option.  The ILB’s read the triangle (Center, Both Guards, to the near back). The Tackles are spill / dive players and the Nose plays a 2 – gap technique. 

Our secondary adjusts to the different formations. They are further from the football, so they have time to process. There are three calls that can be made based on the offensive formation: Sky, Cloud and Yo – Yo.

Sky Call

Slide1

Sky is used when there is single removed receiver and a TE or Tackle. This is a version of quarters coverage where the corners have all of #1 vertical and the Safeties have #2 vertical and out. The ILB’s are hook / curl players that need to expand if a back threatens them to the flat. They will play everything from deep to short.

The safeties are looking at the EMOL for their run / pass key and the corners are pass first players that guard against play action and half back pass. This allows the safeties to be the 8th and 9th defender in the box, allowing us to get max numbers against the run.  The safeties’ job is to fit off of the defenders in front of them.  

As a change up, you can also call double could to this formation if you want your safeties to be able to help on the vertical by #1 or if you want your corners in a good position to play toss or jet sweep. The ILB to the TE would have to carry the TE vertical.

Cloud Call

Slide2Slide2

We use Cloud when there are the following situations: TE / wing, nub TE, or 2 removed receivers. This allows us to play 2 read on the #1 and #2 receiver, so we do not get picked or rubbed in the passing game.

Both the corner and the safety to the Cloud side will read the TE / wing area for their run / pass key. When then get run, both of them will fit off of the defenders in front of them.

Yo-yo Call

Slide2

We use Yo – Yo when we get trips, so the boundary safety will poach 3 vertical and he can be an extra hat in the run game if #3 blocks. The corner to the single receiver side will play a third and the corner and safety to trips read #2 and #3 as one person. Meaning, if #2 or #3 work out, the corner will settle and the field safety will play over the top of #1.

Coaching Points:

The majority of the coaching in Read coverage comes with formation recognition. The secondary must understand when to use each of the calls (Sky, Cloud, Yo – Yo) because they are the ones that are responsible for making the coverage adjustments. They will ensure that we can get a secondary player into the run fit so we can be plus 1 in the box.

As with any defensive structure, we practice block recognition and destruction more than anything else. Your players have to be able to identify blocks and destroy blocks on defense if you want to be successful on game day. We make this scheme simple so our players can play FAST and focus on the fundamentals.

Variations:

The variations that you could see in this concept would be 10 and 20 personnel where you don’t see a TE. Read coverage is still very effective because you will get a 7-man box versus 10 personnel and an 8-max box versus 20 personnel. This coverage allows you to pattern match as well, so when a team throws the football you are in good position to match the different route concepts you will see in a game. Below are examples of how we align to 10 (Doubles and Trips) and 20 personnel.

Slide5Slide5Slide5

To study game film of these coverage concepts, click on the video below:

Read More

Developing an Explosive Play “Culture”

By Jared Hottle
Offensive Coordinator / Wide Receiver Coach
Dakota State University (SD)
Twitter: @CoachHottle

Introduction:

It is well documented that explosive plays lead to points, success, and winning. Brian Billick in Developing an Offensive Gameplan, Bill Connelly in his article “The Five Factors: College football’s most important stats” and the Football Outsiders and their tracking of explosive plays in the NFL all have reached one conclusion. Explosive Plays equal wins. My study in the success of Dakota State University Football reaches the same conclusion. Obviously, every college coach in America wants explosive plays on Saturday but at Dakota State we believe there are ways to manufacture explosive plays through specific processes in scheme, practicing, game planning, and recruiting.

hottle

The Study

The first thing we must do is define explosive plays. Many programs and coaches have many different definitions and classifications for explosive plays. I decided to classify an explosive play as a run 12 yards or over and a pass 18 yards or over. These numbers are similar to the classifications used by others for the professional game (Developing an Offensive Gameplan). I have tracked the explosive plays at Dakota State over the last four years which gave me a significant sample size to run regression analysis. Most analysis on explosive plays and success is a comprehensive team view. Explosive plays are seen more on a net scale with explosive plays gained by the offense less the explosive plays given up by the defense. For my study, I wanted to view explosive plays and success through a purely offensive lens. To do this I used points instead of wins as the dependent variable. I found explosive plays to be highly significant with a p-value well under .001. The coefficient on explosive plays is 3.57. For every run 12 yards or more, or pass play 18 yards or more a team can expect 3.57 points.

Explosive Plays

As a football coach, it is obviously very intuitive to believe that the bigger plays you have the more points you will score. This data is also backed up by statistical analysis. Some coaches believe explosive plays are purely coincidental. Low-percentage plays born from a play-caller or a quarterback just taking a chance. Although there are some inherent risks when it comes to vertical passes down the field there are also other ways to generate explosive plays. Furthermore, I believe a lot can be done to help sway the percentages in the favor of the offense.

Scheme

From a scheme stand-point there are a lot of things you can do to create explosive plays. You do not need to be an exclusively or even favor a vertically passing team to create explosive plays. Although this might sound counterintuitive our focus on scheme is on that of creating efficient positive plays. You may ask how can a coach so focused on explosive plays be creating an offense focused on efficient plays?

To answer this question, we must go back to the statistics. 62% of our explosive plays happened on the 4th play of the drive or later and 60% of explosive passes and 78% of explosive runs occured in the 2nd half. I attribute this distribution of explosive plays, at least in part, to the confusion and stress a defense might feel with an offense driving and getting at least one first down, and to the fatigue of the defense over the course of a game and the tendency of a defense to miss tackles and miss assignments as they become fatigued. As an offense, to get the defense to this point, one needs to get 1st downs, take snaps, and stay on the football field.

There are many philosophies of an efficient offense at Dakota State we attempt to do this with a balanced run to pass ratio which incorporates quick passes, 5-step intermediate to deep passes, and a predominately zone running scheme. Two passing concepts that we have had luck with both in creating explosive plays against all coverage looks are our Double Post Concept and our Post and In Concept.

Double Post

Slide1

Read More