Altering Blitz Angles to Defend 10/11 Personnel Run Schemes

By Steve Erxleben
Defensive Coordinator
South River High School (MD)

 

Introduction:

srhsThe ability to utilize fire zone blitz concepts on any down and distance is a powerful asset for any defense. It allows the defense to be multiple and defend numerous blocking schemes out of virtually any formation due to its balance and ability to adjust. With such a variety of zone schemes, gap schemes, and man schemes out of multiple formations and at much faster tempos, having a system that applies pressure and dictates tempo has been critical to our success. It also allows defenses with different levels of personnel the ability to play fast while staying sound and not having to worry about bending but not breaking.

We have also found that the ability to adjust blitz paths when bringing pressure to and away from the play is critical to successfully stopping the run. This concept adjusts the angle of the run play and spills it to safety support and/or the unblocked defender as gaps close or cancel themselves out. As a 76% blitz team at South River High School, we found that giving our defenders the ability to readjust their blitz angles by keying the hips of down lineman assignment was critical in getting our defenders unblocked. This allowed our players to play gaps across the LOS and effectively attack the offense.

Structure:

Even though this is a discussion on adjusting blitz angles versus various 1 back runs, it is warranted to briefly discuss our base defensive structure and some basic technique of our down linemen. We look at our blitzes as concepts, so in our verbiage 1 term can cover the assignments of multiple players. Our linebacker’s ability to fit off of the movement of our front is critical to executing each blitz call.

Our base defense is the only defensive call we have where we are in a “read” situation and we are asking our front 7 defenders to key lineman and fit off of blocks to leverage their gap responsibilities. Our base defense is a slanting, 1 gap, odd front scheme with match-up zone coverage principles on the back end. On virtually every snap, our interior defensive tackles are aligned head-up on the offensive tackle in a 4 point stance in a 4 technique. Our nose guard is also aligned head up and in a 4 point stance, aligned in a zero technique, head up on the center.

We like the head-up alignment because it establishes some deception and allows us to disguise where pressure is coming from as well as where we are setting the front. The head-up alignment also plays into a lot of the bluffing and bailing we do with our second level players and our secondary. This creates additional deception to what coverage we are in as well as where we will set our 1 and 5 techniques to the backside and our 4I/3 and 5 techniques to the call side.

When we “set our front” we are telling our three interior lineman to take a 45 degree attack step in the direction of the call and leverage the gap nearest to the slanting call. On the snap, our call side DT will move low and hard staying as square as he can from a 4 technique head up to a 4I technique, inside shade of the tackle. Now a B gap player, the DT will collision the inside half of the tackle getting his inside hand on the inside edge of his shoulder pad and his outside hand down the tackle’s sternum. We give our interior players a pressure key and a read key. In this situation our 4I DT is feeling the tackle that he is slanting away from while reading the block of the near guard.

  • If the guard blocks down and away from the DT or pulls inside, the DT will get his eyes inside, squeeze and stay square leveraging the B gap.
  • If the guard blocks towards the slanting DT, he will get up the field to the heels of the linemen and play the B gap aggressively.

Our NG repeats the same movement from his O alignment but his pressure key is the center and his read key is the backside guard as he becomes a 1 technique backside. Our backside DT away from the call is also performing the same technique accept his pressure key and read key are the same unless he is aligned to the TE. If he is to the open side, he is moving from a 4 to a 5 technique and his pressure and read key is the tackle. If it is a 2 TE set or we are slanting to the TE in 21 personnel, the DT’s pressure key is the tackle but he is reading the block of the TE.

In our base defense, we will set our front either to the field or the boundary, to or away from the multiple receiver side, to or away from the TE, or to or away from the back in the shot gun. Where we are setting the front is a weekly game plan decision. Every snap we make either a “Roger” or “Louie” call which dictates where the 4th rusher is coming from and, if we are in a 3 deep situation, where safety support is spinning. Our interior linemen always slant away from the front call (Roger/Louie) as the 4th rusher (our call side OLB) becomes the C gap player/5 technique call side (Diagram 1).

Read More

Adjusting the “Dump” RPO vs. Man Coverages

By Clay Patterson
Head Coach
Northeast Oklahoma A&M
Twitter: @NEO_Patt

 

Introduction:

neoHere at Trinity Valley Community College, we are a RPO based team with our base run play being the inside zone. We have quick passes tagged off of virtually every run play that we can call. The dump pass concept, which is an RPO play on the classic pop pass, is a tag that we had great success with when it was paired with our inside zone.

One of the best aspects of this concept is its versatility. We basically have the ability to run this off of any run play or anytime there is an uncovered tight end, running back, or wide receiver. The base concept is designed to be run to a three receiver side, but can be run any time you have an uncovered man. Over the last two years, we have averaged 15 yds per pass and 6 yds per run on plays that are include the dump concept.

Dump Concept

Slide1

As I mentioned, normally we call inside zone and tag the dump concept for the #3 eligible player on the backside. We always have our tackles scoop or sift to the linebackers. We want the LB’s to fill their gaps with conviction. Here are the assignments of the receivers in the play:

#1 Receiver (Dump Side) – Block head up to first threat.
#2 Receiver (Dump Side) – Runs a crawfish route. For us, that is where the receiver takes one step towards the line of scrimmage and then back pedals to the sideline.
#3 Receiver (Dump Side) – Runs the dump route. The dump route is first and foremost a hot route. He will outside release away from the inside linebacker. If he is uncovered, he will slow down in the hot window while staying outside and away from the near safety. If the play side safety is directly over the top of the dump route and the backside safety is out of the picture, will run turn the dump into a bender at 8-10 yds. The Dump Route is best executed when players understand to coverage and how to run to grass.
#1 Receiver (Zone Side / away from the dump) – Runs a three step Now route (also called a Hitch).

Read More

Shake Concept in GL/SY Situations

By Davide Giuliano
Head Coach /Offensive Coordinator
Italian National American Football Team
Twitter: @ItaliaBlueTeam

 

Introduction:

helmetsThe “rub” concept is our go to play inside the 5 yard line. We know our opponent will isolate our receivers on a man to man coverage and we use the run to take advantage of this coverage. This fits within our 1 back spread no huddle offense and gives us simple answers in the red zone.

The name of this concept is from the Shake concept made famous by the Air Raid offense. The two concepts actually look very similar to each other with the exception being that we run it in a very compressed part of the field, essentially against tight man coverage and with no post threat.

Shake is a part of our rub concepts package, often known as pick concepts. We emphasize that picking a defender is technically illegal, so we prefer to use the word rub. All we want to achieve with our rub plays is leverage, referring to the receiver being able to win the route side space and position his body so he can protect the ball from a defender covering him. Once we get leverage, all we need is to put the ball into the hands of the player with best leverage.

Slide1

Protection:

Before we get into the routes, we should briefly discuss our protection scheme.

We are a vertical set pass protection offense, our base protection is a Slide/man concept with the side of the RB blocking MDM (most-dangerous-man) and the opposite side blocking their outside gap. In each of our quick passing plays, our vertical set technique consists of two drop back steps and punch with the main goal of not letting any free rusher coming from the inside.

We also run some of our short yardage goal line plays out of a rollout protection, so we can get an additional option for the QB to keep the ball and run.

Receivers Assignments

Alignment:

Our standard receiver alignment on a 2×2 formation is as follows:

  • Ball spotted on the opposite HM or middle of the field
    • Outside receiver lines up on the ball and just inside the numbers
    • Inside receiver lines up off the ball and splits the distance between the outside receiver and the EMOL
  • Ball spotted on the same HM
    • Outside receiver lines up on the ball and 1 yard outside the numbers
    • Inside receiver lines up off the ball and splits the distance between the outside receiver and the EMOL

When running most of our goal line pass plays, we tighten up our receivers alignment asking our outside receiver to line up 2 to 3 yards closer to the ball than usual while our inside receiver will line up 41/2 to 5 yards inside of the outside receiver. We use this alignment for the majority of our goal line pass plays not to give the defense any hint on what play we will be running.

Slide2

Read More

Man Pass Pro Drills: Case 1 – Drilling the Feet

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

Introduction:

When we initially began conducting our research on this topic, we were presented with a dilemma. We knew both the hands and feet were vital in pass protection, but we were curious to see which of these two components offensive line coaches placed more of an emphasis on. Of the ten contributors in this study, almost all of them suggested that the feet are more important than the hands and the reasoning is simple: The feet put an offensive lineman in the best position to stop an inside or an outside charge in man pass protection. While many offensive line coaches teach different techniques on the punch, the footwork to get him there remains vital. We started our research process by asking our contributors what the most important techniques are when coaching the feet in pass protection. Before we delve into the techniques these coaches use and the drill work that corresponds with it, a brief background on who our contributors are:

The Contributors (in alphabetical order):

  • Chennis Berry (CB), Offensive Line Coach, Southern University (8 sacks allowed in 2014, 4th in FCS).
  • Brian Callahan (BC), Offensive Line Coach, Western Michigan University (allowed 1.8 sacks per game in 2014).
  • Vin Giacalone (VG), Offensive Line Coach, Valparaiso University (5 sacks allowed in 2014, 1st in FCS).
  • Herb Hand (HH), Offensive Line Coach, Penn State University.
  • Art Kehoe (AK), Offensive Line Coach, the University of Miami.
  • Brandon Jones (BJ), former Offensive Line Coach at East Carolina University (371 passing yards per game in 2014, 3rd in FBS), currently at Cal Berkeley.
  • Jonathan Leibel (JL), Offensive Line Coach, Central Connecticut State University (11 sacks allowed in 2014, 10th in FCS).
  • Cameron Norcross (CN), Offensive Line Coach, Fresno State University.
  • Ryan Stancheck (RS), Offensive Line Coach, Alcorn State University (7 sacks allowed in 2014, 3rd in FCS).
  • John Strollo (JS), Offensive Line Coach, Ball State University (13 sacks allowed in 2014, 12th in FBS).

We started by asking a general question on footwork. Our contributors’ responses are categorized by their initials.

MK: What are some of the most important coaching points you emphasize when teaching the feet of offensive lineman in pass protection?

BC: “We spend a lot of time talking about the various kinds of alignments defensive linemen will be in pre-snap. We talk about head-up alignment, outside eye alignment, outside shoulder alignment and wide shade alignment. Our coaching points for each are as follows:

Head Up Alignment (Diagram 1): Here the offensive line short sets to the inside and takes away the inside charge of the defender. The inside power foot is moved about six inches to the inside to secure the inside against the rush that way.

Slide1

Outside Eye Alignment (Diagram 2): Here the offensive lineman moves his feet in the set but he doesn’t travel with the foot movement. He picks up the power foot, puts it down in the same spot and takes the defender in a short set. With the outside eye defender, the tackle is already in the right aiming point and doesn’t change his alignment. On an outside eye alignment, the tackle will vertical set and work the line. The line is the imaginary line drawn on the outside foot of the tackle seven yards deep. The tackle kicks one step straight back with his outside foot and drags the inside power foot. This allows the offensive tackle to react to the defenders movement inside. If there is no inside move, the tackle kicks again down the line. It gives him enough depth so he will not turn before the defensive end passes the quarterback’s set point. If he gives too much width as he works down the line, he gives up the inside and lets the defender have a two-way go. Giving up too much width allows the defenders to run twist stunts more effectively.

Slide2

Outside Shoulder Alignment (Diagram 3): Here the blocker sets short and outside and makes sure he does not give up an inside gap with his set. If he sets too wide, he gives up the inside gap to a counter move. The set is a step drop and skate back for the tackle. Tackle still works the line here. He takes two steps straight back and repeats that movement as he retreats. In the eye alignment, he sets one step because of the inside threat movement.

Read More

Man Pass Pro Drills: Case 2 – Drilling the Hands

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

Introduction:

While the feet come first, the hands come second. In this case, we researched the various ways in which offensive line coaches were teaching the placement and strike force of the hands in pass protection. Some taught breastplate aiming points, while others taught armpit aiming points.

Western Michigan offensive line coach Brian Callahan emphasized the “aim small, miss small” mantra while Ball State offensive line coach John Strollo has his linemen lock their thumbs together to generate force when creating a punch.

This section is devoted to the techniques and drill work associated with hand placement in man pass protection. Before we delve into the techniques these coaches use and the drill work that corresponds with it, a brief background on who our contributors are:

The Contributors (in alphabetical order):

  • Chennis Berry (CB), Offensive Line Coach, Southern University (8 sacks allowed in 2014, 4th in FCS).
  • Brian Callahan (BC), Offensive Line Coach, Western Michigan University.
  • Vin Giacalone (VG), Offensive Line Coach, Valparaiso University (5 sacks allowed in 2014, 1st in FCS).
  • Herb Hand (HH), Offensive Line Coach, Penn State University.
  • Art Kehoe (AK), Offensive Line Coach, the University of Miami (allowed 1.6 sacks per game in 2014).
  • Brandon Jones (BJ), former Offensive Line Coach at East Carolina University (371 passing yards per game in 2014, 3rd in FBS), currently at Cal Berkeley.
  • Jonathan Leibel (JL), Offensive Line Coach, Central Connecticut State University (11 sacks allowed in 2014, 10th in FCS).
  • Cameron Norcross (CN), Offensive Line Coach, Fresno State University.
  • Ryan Stancheck (RS), Offensive Line Coach, Alcorn State University (7 sacks allowed in 2014, 3rd in FCS).
  • John Strollo (JS), Offensive Line Coach, Ball State University (13 sacks allowed in 2014, 12th in FBS).

We started our research by asking a generic question. Our contributors’ responses are marked with their initials below:

MK: What coaching points do you emphasize to teach the hands of offensive linemen in pass protection?

BC: “We try to have a quarter sized target on the inside number of defenders to eliminate any distractions and so that we are less susceptible to head bobs, etc. We will get elite at stabbing and punching before anything else. If I can’t punch, it doesn’t make a difference what he does. We talk about ‘set and stab’ as the hat and hands in the actual set of the offensive lineman. The stab is the punch from the hands. The coaching points are thumbs up and elbows close to the body. We want the hands on each number of the opponent’s jersey. We want to strike upward blows with the hands. I want to get a slight upward blow with a partial roll of the hips. We want to sit and separate from the defender. We do not want the defender grabbing the offensive lineman.”

CB: “We talk more about the hands than the feet. We talk about, of course, being lower than our opponents on the initial set. We don’t use a specific landmark for the hands although we do try to get them in the breastplate. Instead, we emphasize our hands touching each other. As long as they touch, that gives us a good frame of reference for the punch (Diagram 14).”

Slide15

JS: “We want to play long to increase our striking radius and protect our chest. To us, the definition of long is to get our hands on the defender first before you get your head or shoulder on him. If you anchor your hands quickly and properly, you may not have to apply your head or shoulder. When your hands are anchored to the man and your feet are rooted to the ground, you can transfer force to him in order to affect change. Stability is the function of posture, equilibrium, roots and anchors, while instability is usually created by taking big steps or having too narrow of a base. Our goal is to change the opponent by destabilizing him. We want to ‘push him into the pool’ without falling into the pool ourselves.

Hand Placement Drill: East Carolina University

Read More

Man Pass Pro Drills: Case 3 – Blocking First Level Twists

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

Introduction:

While many of the techniques in the previous two cases can be applied when blocking stagnant or stationary targets, the greater issue in pass protection is coaching players on how to defend movement, particularly at the first level.

This section is devoted to the techniques and drill work associated with defending E/T and T/E games, zone pressures and man pressures in pass protection. We researched not only how offensive line coaches are teaching their players to identify pressure, but more importantly, how to block it when it does come. Before we delve into the techniques these coaches use and the drill work that corresponds with it, a brief background on who our contributors are:

The Contributors (in alphabetical order):

  • Chennis Berry (CB), Offensive Line Coach, Southern University (8 sacks allowed in 2014, 4th in FCS).
  • Brian Callahan (BC), Offensive Line Coach, Western Michigan University,
  • Vin Giacalone (VG), Offensive Line Coach, Valparaiso University (5 sacks allowed in 2014, 1st in FCS).
  • Herb Hand (HH), Offensive Line Coach, Penn State University.
  • Art Kehoe (AK), Offensive Line Coach, the University of Miami (allowed 1.6 sacks per game in 2014).
  • Brandon Jones (BJ), former Offensive Line Coach at East Carolina University (371 passing yards per game in 2014, 3rd in FBS), currently at Cal Berkeley.
  • Jonathan Leibel (JL), Offensive Line Coach, Central Connecticut State University (11 sacks allowed in 2014, 10th in FCS).
  • Cameron Norcross (CN), Offensive Line Coach, Fresno State University.
  • Ryan Stancheck (RS), Offensive Line Coach, Alcorn State University (7 sacks allowed in 2014, 3rd in FCS).
  • John Strollo (JS), Offensive Line Coach, Ball State University (13 sacks allowed in 2014, 12th in FBS).

We started by asking our contributors two questions. Their replies are marked with their initials below:

MK: What are some pressure “tells” you work with your offensive linemen in recognizing?

BJ: “We talk about blitz demeanor more than anything. We don’t use a vertical set to the man side. We read the linebackers blitz demeanor. If he is heavy on his toes and he’s hugged up we will make sure we protect the inside. We will get a lot of Bluff fronts where teams will line up in two 3-techniques. We want to get big-on-big if they are mugged up, our running back has to earn his keep. So they will slide to the Mike. We used to try to gap it and put the back on the DE, but instead we did it another way. My rules for the tackles are if the defensive end spies (drops), your eyes have to go outside in case they bring a corner or outside backer. If all else clears, we come back inside and body presence and find work. They used to mug him up and drop him because you didn’t want the running back on the backer.”

RS: “Much of it is by game plan. We will know before we play them if they are either a back blitz team, a boundary blitz team or a field blitz team percentage wise. I put it on the tackle, but this year I had a smart center. We read safeties, one high vs. two high. If that safety is rolling down we have to be aware of it. If we have two receivers out there and three defenders we need to know something is coming there. We can change pressure if it shows late, but it’s on the quarterback. Six-man protection is harder to change because you already have your wall side (slide side). We will set the wall side to the side of the pressure. A shade technique is a big indicator for us as well. If he’s been a 2i-technique and he lines up in a shade, then we need to be aware of it to cross face. If a 5-technique is always loose and then he lines up as a tight 4-technique, than that’s something we need to be aware of. Anytime you have a standup, you need to be aware of it. You want your wall to be there. We will often get teams mugging the center, where the backers walk up on the line of scrimmage then bail out. We would have to make a man call in this situation and often times you get one-on-one blocking. It’s a three down look but it’s Bear. Now you have to man it up. It’s hard because you’re man against a player running a 4.6 forty. Those linebackers walk up.”

BC: “Many times teams they will either give it away or come from a distance which will allow us to react back to it. The secondary players will try to hold to see our indicator but it’s our job to make sure we’re not telegraphing our protections.
The quarterback will handle this most of the time, but I do think linemen should know it. Teams that run fire zone pressures give the offense some certain indicators. The first hint is the alignment of the Mike linebacker who widens to an almost a 5-technique stack position when pressure is coming from his side. The 3-technique could be wider than normal and, in some cases, his stance reverses. Instead of having his ball hand on the ground, his outside hand is down to aid his outside movement. We try to look at all of that.”

Read More

Third-Level RPO Concepts Off Inside Zone and Jet Sweep

By Joe Whipple
Head Coach
Schalmont High School (NY)
Twitter: @coachwhip

Introduction

whippleWe run Inside Zone, Veer, Buck Sweep, and Jet Sweep as our core plays. In order for us to run these plays successfully we add “pops” to these plays. These pop concepts serve as RPO options for us that allow us to read second and third level defenders. There are countless options once you have your core plays down. These pop tags have allowed us to average 60 points a game this year. In this clinic report, I will break down our favorite third level-reads as they are less common and have been particularly potent for us this past year.

Play-Calling Progression

Before we get into the details of our RPOs, here is how we call these plays in our system. The quarterback will call the run side of the play first; then, if there is a second call, that call will be the pop side or screen side of the play.

This helps the line know which way to work their techniques. For example, “red” is jet sweep to the right. That means that the right side of the line will execute jet sweep with the skill players on the right and the running back. If the second call is “light,” that indicates that the left side will run our WR screen to the Left.

Veer Safety Read

Slide1

Q – This is a double option play. If the QB reads pre snap that the LB is outside the DE to the side of the run, he will hand the ball off to the T. If he isn’t, he will move on to the RPO option after the snap. At the snap, the quarterback will mesh with the T and read the safety. If the safety sits and supports the run, he will throw the vertical to the Z. If he drops with the Z, the QB will pull the ball from the mesh and replace the Z. Our other option with the safety will be the hitch read. If the safety bails, then we will tag the run with the Hitch. The Z will then run the hitch at 7-9 yards.

T – Run mesh with QB. He must expect to get the ball. If he does not get the ball, he will stay on his path and look to block first wrong color jersey that appears.

X – Get vertical and attack the outside number of the corner.

Z – Attack the safety vertically. If he sits at a depth of 7-10 yards, then attack his outside number and stay vertical. If his hips open and look to take away deep 1/4-1/12 then pull up between 7-9 yards and convert hitch.

Read More

Designing a Pressure Plan to Attack 11 Personnel

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager 
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikeKKuchar

Editor’s Note: The following research is excerpted from XandOLabs.com special report on Developing a Pressure Check System.

 

11 Personnel Pressure Checks

Essential Questions/Answers on how to attack 11 personnel:

vtfbQ: What if the tight end is not tied into protection?

A: We’ve found that many defensive coaches aren’t seeing tight ends that are tied into protection. It usually is six-man protection with the back. If that is the case, five to six man pressures can be effective. Keep in mind, a three-by-one closed set does give the opportunity for outside linebackers to get on pressure tracks, because inside linebackers are able to work to number three (the tight end) in coverage. So it may be beneficial to bring perimeter pressures.

Q: What if the tight end is tied into protection?

A: Now with the tight end tied into protection, defenses have a choice to bring pressure to the tight end to get some sort of exterior rush or bring it away from the tight end, if teams are sliding in that direction. We’ve heard many coaches talk about getting that exterior pressure to the tight end side, particularly against sprint out concepts.

Q: How much of the offenses run game are predicated to the three man surface?

A: Some coaches are choosing to design their pressures to the three-man surface side in run-downs. One back power teams or one back zone teams may be affected by a check system designed to bring pressure to the tight end.

Where to Attack

Bud Foster specifically uses an 11 check in his pressure system where he may be having five different calls based off his 11 checks. “The back could be at home, he could be weak or could be strong and we can play three different coverage’s based off of it,” said Foster. “We won’t change the front. If they detached a TE, we may pressure now to the side of the Tight End.”

Scott Donaldson is one of those coaches who prefer an exterior pressure against tight end or three-man surface structures. Although he mentions he doesn’t see many teams that keep the tight end in protection, when he does it negates any opportunity for an outside backer to be an interior rusher. “It really screws up the timing of the blitz when you have a tight end there,” said Donaldson. “The OLB can get cut off. When the tight end is on the field and we are blitzing a tight end, we will limit the blitzes to the ones that we know time up with a tight end. Anytime the SS has to go inside, its’ no good. Instead we’ll send him outside.”

Garrett Gillick, the former defensive coordinator at Bentley College and now the linebackers coach at the University of New Hampshire, spends more time analyzing where the back is in 11 personnel. “If they come out in 11 personnel with the back weak and we want to run Seattle (detailed below), then we come off the weak side,” said Gillick. “If the back is strong we want to attack the back. We will say check ‘Seattle’ to the back.”

Read More

5 Ways to Maximize the Power Concept

By Justin Gumm
Head Football Coach/Offensive Coordinator
South Beloit High School (IL)
Twitter: @CoachGumm87

Introduction:

At South Beloit High School, we are a spread, no-huddle team that tries to get plays off at an average of 12 seconds between the ball being spot and snapped. Like many no-huddle teams, we signal in our plays and have up to 15 one-word play calls. In our offense, we have two base run plays; inside zone and power. Power, a play that we averaged 6.1 yards per carry for us last season, is the play we will be covering in this clinic report.

For our offensive line, simplicity is extremely important to me. The less they have to know, the faster they can play. We teach “fast minds equal fast feet.” Because we have only two run-blocking schemes, we must be multiple with what we do with our QB’s, WR’s, and RB’s in order to stretch the field horizontally and vertically. Below we will dive into the intricacies of how we get multiple with our “new age” ways to run power.
For a little perspective on the concepts we are going to cover below here is some data on how much we run these plays:

  • Our Power blocking scheme accounts for 45% of our run plays.
  • 32% of Power blocking scheme is Power Read.
  • QB Bubble is the second most common at 19%.
  • Power Give was the least last year at 10% of our Power blocking scheme calls.

Why Run Power?

Here is a shortlist of why we have chosen to make Power one of our two core running concepts:

  1. It is a play that allows us to have multiple double teams up front.
  2. It is a downhill, violent run play that allows you to get North and South with a high percentage of plays getting you positive yards.
  3. It is a scheme that forces defenses to prove their gap integrity and discipline by creating extra gaps at the point of attack.
  4. It is a simple scheme that provides great blocking angles for your offensive linemen.
  5. It is a scheme that can be run many different ways and has many answers to the various techniques teams will use to defend you.

Our Power Scheme

Here is a look at our scheme against 3 common fronts:

Slide1Slide2Slide3

Responsibilities and coaching points include:

  • Q – Pivot on the foot closest to the back. Bring the back side foot forward so you are perpendicular to the line of scrimmage. Extend the ball and make sure you get it into the belly of the back then boot away.
  • H – Side shuffle toward the QB and scissor your feet (front foot should be to the QB). Get the football and attack play side ‘A’ gap. Stay tight off double team and follow back side pocket of pulling guard. Find seam and hit it! DO NOT BOUNCE IT!
  • F – Kick out the play side end man on line of scrimmage (EMLOS). Take a downhill path and work inside out on that defender, stepping with the outside foot first. Your head must be on the inside number of the defender and use your hands and run your feet. If the EMLOS crosses the offensive tackle’s face, work up field and block the outside linebacker.
  • X – Work inside run rules. Drive off ball to sell the fade, come to balance and stalk block defender over you. Be ready to drive the defender in the direction he wants to go. If you are a single receiver run the “Now” or a hand signal route.
  • Y – Drive off ball aiming for the heels of the defensive linemen. Come to balance and cut off the alley player (OLB/SS).
  • Z – Work inside run rules. Drive off ball to sell the fade, come to balance and stalk block defender over you. Be ready to drive the defender in the direction he wants to go. If you are a single receiver run the “Now” or a hand signal route.
  • Play Side Tackle and Play Side Guard – Inside gap, Head up, play side gap or “inside gap to play side combo” (Covered/Uncovered rules). If an immediate threat is to the inside gap, you will down block on that player. If no immediate threat but there is a player head up or immediately in your play side gap, combo block with play side teammate. If no threat, work to the backside linebacker.
  • Center – Similar to play side lineman above with the exception of having a defensive lineman anywhere from the backside A gap (1 technique) to the backside B gap (3 technique) as top priority. Note that we typically do not want to run towards a 1 technique, with a backside 3 technique, but it may happen.
  • Back Side Guard – Skip pull for play side inside linebacker. We use skip pull to keep our shoulders square and get downhil

Read More

Odd Stack Pressures That Attack Empty Formations

By Kai Smalley
Head Coach
Snohomish High School (WA)
Twitter: @fbcoachsmalley

 

Introduction

smalleyWith so many programs running the spread offense with a no-huddle tempo, it is critical to be prepared for any formation or personnel grouping, especially empty sets. Even teams that aren’t “Air Raid” style offenses are spreading the field more and almost every team that does spread the field has some sort of any empty package.

Empty formations present a unique set of problems for defenses. They create numbers advantages for the offense, force the defense to adjust their coverage, and can force the defense to walk defenders out of the box. If your defense is not prepared, an Empty set can cause major problems. To address these issues, we have decided to have a base package that you use to attack Empty formations, that way you aren’t scheming different week to week. That said, it is important to have a couple of options to choose from depending on how an offense attacks your defense, as well as having change-ups to disguise your defense and pressure.

Attacking Empty Formations

We base out of a 3-3-5 defense, which allows us to use multiple fronts without having to change the assignments for the defenders. It also allows us to disguise our fronts and coverages. Diagram #1 shows our base alignment versus an empty formation.

Slide1

Our philosophy in defending empty is to be aggressive and disguise. We align this way against empty no matter what we plan to do, that way it will always look the same. We have three different checks we can use against empty sets and depending on the team we may use all three or possibly just one or two. We teach them all to our players early, so that we are not throwing them something new in the middle of the season for one team or being caught unprepared during a game.

Every spring we install our empty checks as part of our base defense, that way we carry them into the season and we can use them as we see fit. It is important to be able to disguise our intentions pre-snap so that the offense cannot get a read on what we will do, so all three options look the same pre-snap, but each has a different number of actual rushers.

The checks can bring a 6 man pressure, a 4 man pressure or a 3 man pressure. The 3 man pressure has probably been our most effective attack because it involves a read-rush technique that allows us to disguise who will be rushing and where they are coming from depending on the protection the offense uses, it is also a favorite of all our players. This is the pressure will be covered in this report. It should be noted that this scheme is only used against a 5-wide empty look, if they have a true tight end, we will use a different scheme.

Against empty we are always aware of the threat of QB draw, so we reduce from our odd front to an even front by walking our backers up and mix it up from there. This gives us the ability to put 8 defenders into coverage while giving us the option to try and overload the offensive line with the appearance of a 6-man rush. Our base coverage is zero, but we may also mix it up between Man, Man-Combo and Zone coverage. We will always align to show straight Man coverage and keep the offense guessing as to what coverage we may end up playing.

Smack-It (3-Man Read-Rush)

Our most effective option is showing our 6-man pressure and only bringing 3, but doing it creatively with a Read-Rush technique. This is the curve-ball to our empty package. As I mentioned, we have a 6-man pressure and play straight man or bluff pressure and drop into zone coverage and they both have their benefits.

The key to it working is our alignment. The read-rush allows the offensive lines blocking scheme to dictate our rushers angle of attack. It also allows us to us to exploit open rush lanes and match ups.

Front-6 In Smack-It

The front 6 defenders have the ability to make or break this pressure. They have to be smart and disciplined, and once they are, they can have a lot of fun with this call. The defensive linemen like it because they have a chance to drop into coverage. The linebackers have a chance to pin their ears back and come untouched at the quarterback.

Read More

How Championship Coaches Win the Off-Season

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

Editor’s Note: The following research is an excerpt from X&O Labs’ bestselling book, The High School Program Development Study. For more information on this book, please go here.

 

“Failing to prepare is preparing to fail.”  We’ve read this mantra in too many weight rooms, meeting rooms and practice facilities.  While it may be trite, it is profoundly true.  Successful head coaches master the art of preparation and this case is devoted to preparation.  It’s focused around off-season development of a football program, from strength and conditioning to developing team building to conducting practice.  We knew that many coaches were interested in this facet of the game, because it relationship to success is evident.  Here, we present our research on what makes those coaches “win” in the off-season and how they prepare themselves to win during the season. 

But before we present our finding, it’s important to note we did something else that was totally different than previous reports – we segmented our research into separate areas.   We wanted to target successful head coaches in this research and while we’re quick to point out that success is not all about wins (there are certainly too many other variables that add into that equation) winning is truly the main benchmark that we used to separate our readership.  We decided to segment our research into the following groups:

  • All Groups- All Head Coaches that took our survey.  Naturally, this equates to 100 percent of those surveyed.
  • Group 1- Head Coaches that have won at least 75 percent of their games over the last three seasons.  This equated to roughly 33 percent of those surveyed.  These coaches have won at least three-quarters of their games as a head coach since 2011.
  • Group 2- Head Coaches that have won less than 25 percent of their games over the last three seasons.  This equated to roughly 13 percent of those surveyed.  These coaches have won less than three-quarters of their games as a head coach since 2011.
  • Group 3- Head Coaches that have won between 2-5 championships (at the league, county or state level) in their careers.  This equated to roughly 31 percent of those surveyed. 
  • Group 4- Head Coaches that have won between 6-10 championships (at the league, county or state level) in their careers.  This equated to roughly 11 percent of those surveyed.    
  • Group 5- Head Coaches that have never won a championship at any level.  This equated to roughly 29 percent of those surveyed.

Question:  How do you handle the strength and conditioning program at your school?

When surveying all groups, 47.5 percent of coaches say the head coach (themselves) handles the majority of strength training responsibility.   This was pretty consistent among all our groups- both successful and unsuccessful.  Many programs did not have a separate strength and conditioning coach, the largest group that did was a 20.9 percent response rate from those in Group 1- coaches that have won at least 75 percent of their games over the last three seasons. 

ChartExport 3

Question:  How many days per week does your team work out during the off-season?

It seems that four days per week seemed to be the majority response-with over 52 percent of coaches from all groups selecting this response.  We did find that 40.7 percent of those coaches that won 25 percent of their games or less over the last three seasons lift three days per week during the off-season (below). 

ChartExport 4 2

Question:  Do you conduct off-season mat drills in your program?

We defined mat drills as agility or plyometric drills done usually early in the morning to train discipline, speed and agility.  We found that 59.8 percent of all coaches are using a mat drill program while 40.2 are not.  A couple of interesting tidbits here.  Only 60.9 percent of coaches that have won at least six titles conduct mat drills during the off-season.  What was interesting here was that 67 percent of coaches from Groups 2 and 5 (those that have never won a title or won less than 25 percent of its games the last three seasons) do conduct mat drills.  Perhaps, the answer lies in the way in which these mat drills are conducted that equates to success. 

Read More

Midwestern State’s Cajun Concept

By Darren Paige
Wide Receiver Coach
Midwestern State University
Twitter: @WRcoachPaige

 

Introduction:

mwsOver the years, Midwestern State University has been known for getting the most out of our personnel. When breaking in young quarterbacks and wide receivers, we have found that it helps to rely heavily on the quick game and in particular our Cajun concept. This focus has helped us improve our yards after catch (YAC) from 1.2 YAC in 2013 to 8.7 YAC in 2014. We have also seen the power of the quick game/Cajun concept to build the confidence of our young quarterbacks. In 2014, we finished the season 13th in the country in total offense averaging 6.42 yards per play. Traditionally we have been known as a run heavy team and with concepts like Cajun, we have made teams have to respect our passing game as well as our run game.

Base Concept:

The “Cajun” concept is a simple concept that we use out of our 2×2 spread set. The concept consists of an option route by the #1 receiver, a corner route by the #2 receiver has and a bubble by the #3 receiver as shown below. We have enjoyed a lot of success with this concept because it allows us to attack the overhang players on the defense forcing them to make decisions in coverage.

Slide1

This concept for us needs a three man surface, meaning that we need three eligible receivers on the tagged call side. In diagram 2 below, you see we are in a 2×2 formation with the back to the right. In this case, we are going to call this “Cajun Right.”

Slide2

Coaching the Option Route

The outside receivers have what we call option routes. The teach the receivers that right off the snap of the ball we ask them to attack the nearest invert defender. From here, the receiver has a decision to make. If he sees the Rover “R” carry #2, then he is told to replace the “R” feet at 6 yards. If the “R” becomes the flat defender and is running right at the outside receiver, then he it taught to get vertical to his 6 yard route depth and work around that “R” to the inside and show his numbers on the quarterback. If he gets a hard corner or a cover 2 corner, he will still attack that invert defender and if the invert doesn’t carry his route, he will split the difference between the corner and the “R” at his route depth. If that “R” wants to blitz the quarterback, then again he has to try to replace the “R” feet at 6 yards. In this situation, he must be ready for the ball as he becomes the hot receiver.

Read More

Stanford’s Gap Concepts from Unbalanced Formations

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

Editor’s Note: The following research was conducted as part of XandOLabs.com special report on “Zone and Gap Runs from Unbalanced Formations,” which can be accessed in its entirety by clicking here.

Introduction

stanfordWe’ve found that teams that run gap schemes out of unbalanced sets do so because of two main reasons:

  1. An extra player on the line of scrimmage creates and extra gap in the run game, one that a defense must account for. We’ve found that most four down teams that adjust with their front are susceptible to getting gashed in unbalanced sets because they can’t account for the extra gap.
  2. Using unbalanced sets to run down/down/kick out schemes allows you to bring a player from the other side of the line of scrimmage to be the kick out player in power. Now you have a puller and an extra kick out player to run the power scheme.

Stanford University is one of the teams that believe in creating an extra gap by bringing another offensive lineman into the gap. Stanford calls this personnel grouping “Balco” (named after the San Francisco area laboratory implicated in the MLB steroids scandal), which is used to bring a little more “juice” into its offensive system. Stanford will line up in a four-man surface in an “I” formation backfield and run its power scheme strong and weak. X&O Labs had the privilege of vising with the Cardinal’s former offensive line coach Mike Bloomgren who expounded on his double team progression when running its power scheme.

Read More

Odd Front vs. the Run – Case 1: Two Gap Vs. One Gap Technique on the DL

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

Introduction

tommiesIt’s difficult to generate an odd front conversation without the issue of two-gap football surfacing. The odd front is synonymous with two-gap play at the line of scrimmage. From Nick Saban’s system at LSU to Rex Ryan’s system at the Baltimore Ravens (just to name the more prolific examples), the odd front continues to be utilized to defend many of the run game concepts presented at all levels of football.

We’re aware that many defensive coordinators will find ways to corner an offense into third down to bring those exotic pressures associated with the odd front. But this study is not about that. It’s about living and dying in the odd front in run situations. We’re talking about first down defense, here. Because while it may be exciting to draw up those pressures with three down, the odd front purists that we researched have bought in completely to using this scheme. Our research consists of those coaches who use odd front structures in at least 75 percent or more of run-downs.

We asked these coaches why they use the odd front in run downs. Despite a myriad of reasons, we disseminated the top six frequencies in our research:

Benefits of the Odd Front Against the Run Game

  • Opportunity to get your most athletic players on the field: subbing out a defensive lineman for a second level player provides for a more athletic body which helps to defend many of the quarterback run concepts utilized by offenses today.
  • Gets more eyes on the quarterback: Similar to that first example, having two hands less in the dirt helps with quarterback vision in both the option game and in the pass game. This study will strictly focus on the former.
  • Eliminates angles in gap schemes: With so much of the Ohio State/Ole Miss spread gap scheme concepts circulating football, being in an odd front eliminates possible angles and double teams on the play side of these runs. Odd front coaches are using the two-gap method to negate these blocks.
  • Flexibility and disguise pre-snap: What may look like a three-down front pre-snap, 85 percent of odd front coaches are slanting or stemming their front pre-snap to get in different looks by the time the quarterback has the ball in his hands.
  • Alternating run fits post-snap: Contrary to the “single gap control” element present in even front structures, the odd front provides for varying run fits simply because it’s difficult to determine whether or not first level players are two-gapping or single-gapping at the point of attack. The majority of coaches, 47 percent, will two gap their defensive linemen some of the time. They alternate between two-gap play and single gap movement. Of course, we detail both these scenarios in case one.
  • Increased preparation time for offenses: All this pre and post-snap confusion causes offenses to spend more time trying to attack the odd front.
  • A dominant nose can affect the game: We have an entire case on the play of the nose, so we won’t expound too much here. But we will say it’s no surprise that many of these odd front coaches put their best defensive lineman right on the center. With the majority of offense being in shotgun or pistol formations, this player can create havoc if he’s coached right. We will present the drill work that the most successful coaches use to work this kid.

This case will be centered on the varying methodologies between the two-gap and one-gap technique up front. We will examine the techniques associated with each including the circumstances in which coaches use them. We will begin our research with the play of the nose, but before we get into the specifics, we wanted to share some general research among defensive line play.

  • 59 percent of coaches choose to have their front three crowd the line of scrimmage as much as possible

graph3

  • 42 percent of coaches choose to teach a toe to instep stagger among their front three

graph4

We wanted to present these issues because they continue to be hot topics among odd front coaches. We will present all methodologies and perspectives on these components, but the responses above were majority answers.

Play of the Nose Guard

There is no question that the success of the odd front is belied upon the success of the defender covering the center. Looking back at the most successful odd front nose guards in the history of football, Vince Wilfork (Patriots), Tony Siragusa (Colts), Gilbert Brown (Packers), Heloti Ngata (Ravens), one can make the somewhat obvious correlation between great defenses and great middle men. So we wanted to reach out to some coaches on how they teach the nose position, being that it’s so vital. Sure, this player may not attain the accolades, but these odd front coaches rave about him being the motor that makes the defense run. Perhaps Coach Pitman at Half Hollow Hills West HS (NY) said it best when he said, “Toughness must be both physical, but especially mental. He is in a position where he determines our success on defense, but will never get outside attention or build up any noticeable stats.”

Read More

Odd Front vs. the Run – Case 2: Defending the Open Side Run Game

By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Twitter: @MikekKuchar

 

Introduction

jcFor clarification purposes, the open side run game consists of concepts attacking the two-man surface side, away from the tight end or strength. The runs we focused on researching were specifically the spread option game, which encompasses the zone read and power read run game. Because there are different runs designed to both sides of the offensive formation (closed and open), most odd front coaches use different types of personnel to play these two positions.

Characteristics of the Boundary Side (two-man surface) Defensive End

The fact is there is a distinction between the two defensive ends in an odd front defense. Most odd front coaches will rotate their defensive ends based on either field/boundary or closed/open surfaces. While the positioning of this player may vary based on his skill set, we found that the majority of odd front coaches, 51 percent, teach a 4-technique alignment (head up the offensive tackle) for their boundary side defensive end.

graph9

In most cases, this boundary end tends to be a thicker player who has the ability to reduce down and play a 3-technique on the offensive guard. As documented in case four, when most odd front defenses reduce, they will do so to the boundary, putting this player in the B-gap. We researched coaches to find what they were looking for in developing an open side, or two-man surface defensive end. Some of their responses are below:

Coach Gardner, Sandy Valley High School (OH): “We put our best athlete on the defensive line here. He will run down a lot of plays from behind like getting into hip pocket of a pulling guard. Has a ton of tackles for loss. We allow this position to get up field more than others.”

Coach Sturgis, Clinton Central High School (IN): “Most of the time our open side defensive end will end up crashing into the B gap, so we look for a bigger body (4-3 defensive tackle what we call a 3-technique) for that position. He will occasionally be the end defender on the LOS, so he has to be able to move as well.”

Coach Acquarulo, defensive coordinator, Trinity College (CT): “He is a stout player for us. We reduce with him a lot. He plays in a 5-technique. We used to play him in a 4-technique, but we got to the point where we were rotating them between 5-techinque and 4-technique to get a pass rush. Now we tell them that if they are moving post-snap, we will tighten up our alignment. It doesn’t tell the offense where we are going post-snap.”

Coach Giancola, Westfield High School (VA): “In terms of characteristics of our ends in the odd front, we are looking for a few different things: 1) Great Block Recognition, especially Run/Pass reads. As a 4-technique, it is essential to be able to read the difference between a low hat firing off the ball and a high hat kicking off the LOS. As our 4-technique rules dictate, our ends need to fit inside to B gap on base run blocks, whereas we prefer them to initially work outside when they get pass sets if we are not bringing pressure. 2) Intelligence. We need smart football players at our end position in the odd front. They need to be able to quickly diagnose blocks and react with speed and strength, understanding where they fit into the grand scheme of our odd front structure. 3) Great reaction skills. Twitch from all of our defensive linemen is ideal, but our 4-techniques need it to assure they are putting themselves at an advantage early in the play.”

Coach Busmente, Sterling High School (CO): “It has varied from season to season, but if we had an end that was more athletic we would use him here.”

Coach Filho, Santos Tsunami: “He must have a quick first step with the ability to win one-on-one matchups against the offensive guard in pass rush and be quick to disengage and make the play.”

Coach Winstead, South Pointe High School (SC): “We look for a bigger body type, more of a 3-technique. We move our boundary end inside a lot.”

Coach Godwin, Gulf Breeze High School (FL): “Has to be a great B gap defender on the boundary side. He is a bigger stronger kid than the open side defensive end. He cannot get washed down when playing B gap.”

Coach Pitman, Half Hollow Hills West High School (NY): “Discipline is key. They must be able to play hands on the offensive tackle while keeping their eyes inside. The ability to read and react is crucial. Their whole world is determined by what they see and feel.”

Coach Coldirion, Mira Monte High School (CA): “He must be strong enough to take on a offensive tackle and quick enough to close down on a running back or quarterback when the play is going away from him.”

Coach Rector, Central Catholic High School (OR): “Quickness off the ball at the snap. We want to execute a 40-yard dash through tackle. He must be extremely efficient with his hands and hand placement. Key progression – man, near back, backside lineman.”

Read More